The state of evolutionary medicine in undergraduate education

Daniel Z. Grunspan, Karla T. Moeller, Randolph Nesse, Sara Brownell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background and objectives: Undergraduate courses that include evolutionary medicine (EM) are increasingly available, but quantified data about such courses are lacking. In this article, we describe relevant course offerings by institution and department type, in conjunction with information on the backgrounds and experiences of associated instructors. Methodology: We searched course catalogs from 196 American universities to find courses that include EM, and sent a survey to 101 EM instructors to ask about their backgrounds and teaching experiences. Results: Research-focused universities (R1) were much more likely to offer at least one course that covers evolutionary applications to health and disease than universities that granted only bachelor's or master's degrees. A survey course on EM was offered in 56% of 116 R1 universities, but only 2% of the 80 non-R1 universities we searched. Most EM instructors have backgrounds in anthropology or biology; each instructor's area of expertise provides clues as to how continued growth of EM may occur differently by discipline. Conclusions and implications: Undergraduates are most likely to learn about EM in research-intensive universities from an anthropological or biological perspective. Responses from anthropology and biology instructors, including whom they share course materials with, highlight that courses may differ depending on the discipline in which they are taught. LAY SUMMARY: Recognition of evolution's relevance to understanding health and disease is growing, but documentation of coverage in undergraduate education is lacking. This study explores where evolutionary medicine (EM) content is taught across 196 undergraduate institutions and how 53 instructors describe their experiences teaching EM.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)82-92
Number of pages11
JournalEvolution, Medicine and Public Health
Volume2019
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 21 2019

Fingerprint

State Medicine
college students
medicine
education
Medicine
teachers
Education
Anthropology
health and disease
anthropology
teaching
Teaching
university research
Biological Sciences
Health
Research
Documentation

Keywords

  • education
  • evolution and medicine
  • instruction
  • survey
  • undergraduate courses
  • undergraduate education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

The state of evolutionary medicine in undergraduate education. / Grunspan, Daniel Z.; Moeller, Karla T.; Nesse, Randolph; Brownell, Sara.

In: Evolution, Medicine and Public Health, Vol. 2019, No. 1, 21.01.2019, p. 82-92.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{877dc6935fe04daa874d5b226ce5c884,
title = "The state of evolutionary medicine in undergraduate education",
abstract = "Background and objectives: Undergraduate courses that include evolutionary medicine (EM) are increasingly available, but quantified data about such courses are lacking. In this article, we describe relevant course offerings by institution and department type, in conjunction with information on the backgrounds and experiences of associated instructors. Methodology: We searched course catalogs from 196 American universities to find courses that include EM, and sent a survey to 101 EM instructors to ask about their backgrounds and teaching experiences. Results: Research-focused universities (R1) were much more likely to offer at least one course that covers evolutionary applications to health and disease than universities that granted only bachelor's or master's degrees. A survey course on EM was offered in 56{\%} of 116 R1 universities, but only 2{\%} of the 80 non-R1 universities we searched. Most EM instructors have backgrounds in anthropology or biology; each instructor's area of expertise provides clues as to how continued growth of EM may occur differently by discipline. Conclusions and implications: Undergraduates are most likely to learn about EM in research-intensive universities from an anthropological or biological perspective. Responses from anthropology and biology instructors, including whom they share course materials with, highlight that courses may differ depending on the discipline in which they are taught. LAY SUMMARY: Recognition of evolution's relevance to understanding health and disease is growing, but documentation of coverage in undergraduate education is lacking. This study explores where evolutionary medicine (EM) content is taught across 196 undergraduate institutions and how 53 instructors describe their experiences teaching EM.",
keywords = "education, evolution and medicine, instruction, survey, undergraduate courses, undergraduate education",
author = "Grunspan, {Daniel Z.} and Moeller, {Karla T.} and Randolph Nesse and Sara Brownell",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1093/emph/eoz012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2019",
pages = "82--92",
journal = "Evolution, Medicine and Public Health",
issn = "2050-6201",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The state of evolutionary medicine in undergraduate education

AU - Grunspan, Daniel Z.

AU - Moeller, Karla T.

AU - Nesse, Randolph

AU - Brownell, Sara

PY - 2019/1/21

Y1 - 2019/1/21

N2 - Background and objectives: Undergraduate courses that include evolutionary medicine (EM) are increasingly available, but quantified data about such courses are lacking. In this article, we describe relevant course offerings by institution and department type, in conjunction with information on the backgrounds and experiences of associated instructors. Methodology: We searched course catalogs from 196 American universities to find courses that include EM, and sent a survey to 101 EM instructors to ask about their backgrounds and teaching experiences. Results: Research-focused universities (R1) were much more likely to offer at least one course that covers evolutionary applications to health and disease than universities that granted only bachelor's or master's degrees. A survey course on EM was offered in 56% of 116 R1 universities, but only 2% of the 80 non-R1 universities we searched. Most EM instructors have backgrounds in anthropology or biology; each instructor's area of expertise provides clues as to how continued growth of EM may occur differently by discipline. Conclusions and implications: Undergraduates are most likely to learn about EM in research-intensive universities from an anthropological or biological perspective. Responses from anthropology and biology instructors, including whom they share course materials with, highlight that courses may differ depending on the discipline in which they are taught. LAY SUMMARY: Recognition of evolution's relevance to understanding health and disease is growing, but documentation of coverage in undergraduate education is lacking. This study explores where evolutionary medicine (EM) content is taught across 196 undergraduate institutions and how 53 instructors describe their experiences teaching EM.

AB - Background and objectives: Undergraduate courses that include evolutionary medicine (EM) are increasingly available, but quantified data about such courses are lacking. In this article, we describe relevant course offerings by institution and department type, in conjunction with information on the backgrounds and experiences of associated instructors. Methodology: We searched course catalogs from 196 American universities to find courses that include EM, and sent a survey to 101 EM instructors to ask about their backgrounds and teaching experiences. Results: Research-focused universities (R1) were much more likely to offer at least one course that covers evolutionary applications to health and disease than universities that granted only bachelor's or master's degrees. A survey course on EM was offered in 56% of 116 R1 universities, but only 2% of the 80 non-R1 universities we searched. Most EM instructors have backgrounds in anthropology or biology; each instructor's area of expertise provides clues as to how continued growth of EM may occur differently by discipline. Conclusions and implications: Undergraduates are most likely to learn about EM in research-intensive universities from an anthropological or biological perspective. Responses from anthropology and biology instructors, including whom they share course materials with, highlight that courses may differ depending on the discipline in which they are taught. LAY SUMMARY: Recognition of evolution's relevance to understanding health and disease is growing, but documentation of coverage in undergraduate education is lacking. This study explores where evolutionary medicine (EM) content is taught across 196 undergraduate institutions and how 53 instructors describe their experiences teaching EM.

KW - education

KW - evolution and medicine

KW - instruction

KW - survey

KW - undergraduate courses

KW - undergraduate education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072313618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072313618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/emph/eoz012

DO - 10.1093/emph/eoz012

M3 - Article

VL - 2019

SP - 82

EP - 92

JO - Evolution, Medicine and Public Health

JF - Evolution, Medicine and Public Health

SN - 2050-6201

IS - 1

ER -