The sources of secessionist war

the interaction of local control and foreign forces in post-Soviet Georgia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Nationalism is one of the most powerful forces in the modern world–but why some ethno-national groups mobilize for conflict, while others remain quiescent, remains subject to significant disagreement. This paper argues that domestic politics create the incentives for secession, and international forces make conflict feasible against a sometimes stronger military adversary–the state. The proposed theory unpacks this interaction of domestic and international factors, and posits that when regional elites possess local control in an area that is contiguous with a potential sponsor, external support is more feasible and more apt to lead to mobilization and conflict. When regional elites lack local control, external sponsors will be wary of supporting a potentially lost cause and regional elites will exhibit more restraint, reducing the chances of conflict–external support therefore often flows from strong states to strong regions in weaker states. It is instrumental and variable, rather than affective and constant, and thus kin states will not always support their secessionist brethren in neighbouring states. Using a sub-national research design from post-Soviet Georgia, the results lend support to these conjectures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)63-91
Number of pages29
JournalCaucasus Survey
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2016

Fingerprint

elite
interaction
national politics
secession
local elite
nationalism
research planning
mobilization
incentive
Military
cause
politics
lack
conflict
Interaction
Post-Soviet
Group
Local Elites
Sponsor
Restraint

Keywords

  • Abkhazia
  • Caucasus
  • ethno-nationalism
  • ethnofederalism
  • external actors
  • Georgia
  • local control
  • Russia
  • Secessionist war
  • South Ossetia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Cultural Studies
  • Anthropology
  • Demography

Cite this

The sources of secessionist war : the interaction of local control and foreign forces in post-Soviet Georgia. / Siroky, David.

In: Caucasus Survey, Vol. 4, No. 1, 02.01.2016, p. 63-91.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a97fac31cca4418d828dd05c72b23461,
title = "The sources of secessionist war: the interaction of local control and foreign forces in post-Soviet Georgia",
abstract = "Nationalism is one of the most powerful forces in the modern world–but why some ethno-national groups mobilize for conflict, while others remain quiescent, remains subject to significant disagreement. This paper argues that domestic politics create the incentives for secession, and international forces make conflict feasible against a sometimes stronger military adversary–the state. The proposed theory unpacks this interaction of domestic and international factors, and posits that when regional elites possess local control in an area that is contiguous with a potential sponsor, external support is more feasible and more apt to lead to mobilization and conflict. When regional elites lack local control, external sponsors will be wary of supporting a potentially lost cause and regional elites will exhibit more restraint, reducing the chances of conflict–external support therefore often flows from strong states to strong regions in weaker states. It is instrumental and variable, rather than affective and constant, and thus kin states will not always support their secessionist brethren in neighbouring states. Using a sub-national research design from post-Soviet Georgia, the results lend support to these conjectures.",
keywords = "Abkhazia, Caucasus, ethno-nationalism, ethnofederalism, external actors, Georgia, local control, Russia, Secessionist war, South Ossetia",
author = "David Siroky",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/23761199.2015.1136516",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "63--91",
journal = "Caucasus Survey",
issn = "2376-1199",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The sources of secessionist war

T2 - the interaction of local control and foreign forces in post-Soviet Georgia

AU - Siroky, David

PY - 2016/1/2

Y1 - 2016/1/2

N2 - Nationalism is one of the most powerful forces in the modern world–but why some ethno-national groups mobilize for conflict, while others remain quiescent, remains subject to significant disagreement. This paper argues that domestic politics create the incentives for secession, and international forces make conflict feasible against a sometimes stronger military adversary–the state. The proposed theory unpacks this interaction of domestic and international factors, and posits that when regional elites possess local control in an area that is contiguous with a potential sponsor, external support is more feasible and more apt to lead to mobilization and conflict. When regional elites lack local control, external sponsors will be wary of supporting a potentially lost cause and regional elites will exhibit more restraint, reducing the chances of conflict–external support therefore often flows from strong states to strong regions in weaker states. It is instrumental and variable, rather than affective and constant, and thus kin states will not always support their secessionist brethren in neighbouring states. Using a sub-national research design from post-Soviet Georgia, the results lend support to these conjectures.

AB - Nationalism is one of the most powerful forces in the modern world–but why some ethno-national groups mobilize for conflict, while others remain quiescent, remains subject to significant disagreement. This paper argues that domestic politics create the incentives for secession, and international forces make conflict feasible against a sometimes stronger military adversary–the state. The proposed theory unpacks this interaction of domestic and international factors, and posits that when regional elites possess local control in an area that is contiguous with a potential sponsor, external support is more feasible and more apt to lead to mobilization and conflict. When regional elites lack local control, external sponsors will be wary of supporting a potentially lost cause and regional elites will exhibit more restraint, reducing the chances of conflict–external support therefore often flows from strong states to strong regions in weaker states. It is instrumental and variable, rather than affective and constant, and thus kin states will not always support their secessionist brethren in neighbouring states. Using a sub-national research design from post-Soviet Georgia, the results lend support to these conjectures.

KW - Abkhazia

KW - Caucasus

KW - ethno-nationalism

KW - ethnofederalism

KW - external actors

KW - Georgia

KW - local control

KW - Russia

KW - Secessionist war

KW - South Ossetia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988860502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988860502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/23761199.2015.1136516

DO - 10.1080/23761199.2015.1136516

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 63

EP - 91

JO - Caucasus Survey

JF - Caucasus Survey

SN - 2376-1199

IS - 1

ER -