The snowbird charrette: Integrative interdisciplinary collaboration in environmental research design

Edward J. Hackett, Diana R. Rhoten

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The integration of ideas, methods, and data from diverse disciplines has been a transformative force in science and higher education, attracting policy interventions, program innovations, financial resources, and talented people. Much energy has been invested in producing a new generation of scientists trained to work fluidly across disciplines, sectors, and research problems, yet the success of such investments has been difficult to measure. Using the Integrative Graduate Education and Research Training (IGERT) program of the U. S. National Science Foundation as a strategic research site, we conducted an experiment to determine whether and how the process and products of research of IGERT-trained scientists differ from those of scientists trained in disciplinary graduate programs. Among scientists in the early years of graduate study we found substantial and consistent differences suggesting that interdisciplinary training improved the quality and process of research, but this pattern was equally strongly reversed among students in the latter years of graduate study. Using systematic observation and other data we suggest why this might be so, then discuss the implications of these results for the design and conduct of graduate education and research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)407-440
Number of pages34
JournalMinerva
Volume47
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2010

Fingerprint

environmental research
research planning
graduate
education
science
training program
innovation
energy
experiment
resources

Keywords

  • Experiment
  • Graduate education
  • IGERT
  • Research
  • Science policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

The snowbird charrette : Integrative interdisciplinary collaboration in environmental research design. / Hackett, Edward J.; Rhoten, Diana R.

In: Minerva, Vol. 47, No. 4, 01.2010, p. 407-440.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hackett, Edward J. ; Rhoten, Diana R. / The snowbird charrette : Integrative interdisciplinary collaboration in environmental research design. In: Minerva. 2010 ; Vol. 47, No. 4. pp. 407-440.
@article{da0a2dcfa6c44b2c8f449396dd2bafb6,
title = "The snowbird charrette: Integrative interdisciplinary collaboration in environmental research design",
abstract = "The integration of ideas, methods, and data from diverse disciplines has been a transformative force in science and higher education, attracting policy interventions, program innovations, financial resources, and talented people. Much energy has been invested in producing a new generation of scientists trained to work fluidly across disciplines, sectors, and research problems, yet the success of such investments has been difficult to measure. Using the Integrative Graduate Education and Research Training (IGERT) program of the U. S. National Science Foundation as a strategic research site, we conducted an experiment to determine whether and how the process and products of research of IGERT-trained scientists differ from those of scientists trained in disciplinary graduate programs. Among scientists in the early years of graduate study we found substantial and consistent differences suggesting that interdisciplinary training improved the quality and process of research, but this pattern was equally strongly reversed among students in the latter years of graduate study. Using systematic observation and other data we suggest why this might be so, then discuss the implications of these results for the design and conduct of graduate education and research.",
keywords = "Experiment, Graduate education, IGERT, Research, Science policy",
author = "Hackett, {Edward J.} and Rhoten, {Diana R.}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11024-009-9136-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "407--440",
journal = "Minerva",
issn = "0026-4695",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The snowbird charrette

T2 - Integrative interdisciplinary collaboration in environmental research design

AU - Hackett, Edward J.

AU - Rhoten, Diana R.

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - The integration of ideas, methods, and data from diverse disciplines has been a transformative force in science and higher education, attracting policy interventions, program innovations, financial resources, and talented people. Much energy has been invested in producing a new generation of scientists trained to work fluidly across disciplines, sectors, and research problems, yet the success of such investments has been difficult to measure. Using the Integrative Graduate Education and Research Training (IGERT) program of the U. S. National Science Foundation as a strategic research site, we conducted an experiment to determine whether and how the process and products of research of IGERT-trained scientists differ from those of scientists trained in disciplinary graduate programs. Among scientists in the early years of graduate study we found substantial and consistent differences suggesting that interdisciplinary training improved the quality and process of research, but this pattern was equally strongly reversed among students in the latter years of graduate study. Using systematic observation and other data we suggest why this might be so, then discuss the implications of these results for the design and conduct of graduate education and research.

AB - The integration of ideas, methods, and data from diverse disciplines has been a transformative force in science and higher education, attracting policy interventions, program innovations, financial resources, and talented people. Much energy has been invested in producing a new generation of scientists trained to work fluidly across disciplines, sectors, and research problems, yet the success of such investments has been difficult to measure. Using the Integrative Graduate Education and Research Training (IGERT) program of the U. S. National Science Foundation as a strategic research site, we conducted an experiment to determine whether and how the process and products of research of IGERT-trained scientists differ from those of scientists trained in disciplinary graduate programs. Among scientists in the early years of graduate study we found substantial and consistent differences suggesting that interdisciplinary training improved the quality and process of research, but this pattern was equally strongly reversed among students in the latter years of graduate study. Using systematic observation and other data we suggest why this might be so, then discuss the implications of these results for the design and conduct of graduate education and research.

KW - Experiment

KW - Graduate education

KW - IGERT

KW - Research

KW - Science policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73949089926&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=73949089926&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11024-009-9136-0

DO - 10.1007/s11024-009-9136-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:73949089926

VL - 47

SP - 407

EP - 440

JO - Minerva

JF - Minerva

SN - 0026-4695

IS - 4

ER -