The shepherding of local public opinion: The Supreme Court and Lamb's Chapel

Valerie Hoekstra, Jeffrey A. Segal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We argue that the standard methodology for assessing the impact of Supreme Court decisions on public opinion, which relies on national surveys to measure public attitudes before and after relevant Court decisions, fails, among other grounds, to account for the fact that the overwhelming majority of Court decisions speak to particular constituencies only. We assess the impact of the Supreme Court's decision in Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches on the geographic constituencies involved in the case. We interviewed a random sample of residents in the town of Center Moriches and in the surrounding county of Suffolk, New York, before and after the decision. Consistent with the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion (Petty and Cacioppo 1986), we find that high levels of information about the decision increases support for the Court's decision among those for whom the decision is relatively less salient.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1079-1102
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Politics
Volume58
Issue number4
StatePublished - Nov 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

local public
court decision
public opinion
Supreme Court
level of information
persuasion
random sample
town
resident
methodology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

The shepherding of local public opinion : The Supreme Court and Lamb's Chapel. / Hoekstra, Valerie; Segal, Jeffrey A.

In: Journal of Politics, Vol. 58, No. 4, 11.1996, p. 1079-1102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a0306aebe87b4e23b315a498fbf88805,
title = "The shepherding of local public opinion: The Supreme Court and Lamb's Chapel",
abstract = "We argue that the standard methodology for assessing the impact of Supreme Court decisions on public opinion, which relies on national surveys to measure public attitudes before and after relevant Court decisions, fails, among other grounds, to account for the fact that the overwhelming majority of Court decisions speak to particular constituencies only. We assess the impact of the Supreme Court's decision in Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches on the geographic constituencies involved in the case. We interviewed a random sample of residents in the town of Center Moriches and in the surrounding county of Suffolk, New York, before and after the decision. Consistent with the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion (Petty and Cacioppo 1986), we find that high levels of information about the decision increases support for the Court's decision among those for whom the decision is relatively less salient.",
author = "Valerie Hoekstra and Segal, {Jeffrey A.}",
year = "1996",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "1079--1102",
journal = "Journal of Politics",
issn = "0022-3816",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The shepherding of local public opinion

T2 - The Supreme Court and Lamb's Chapel

AU - Hoekstra, Valerie

AU - Segal, Jeffrey A.

PY - 1996/11

Y1 - 1996/11

N2 - We argue that the standard methodology for assessing the impact of Supreme Court decisions on public opinion, which relies on national surveys to measure public attitudes before and after relevant Court decisions, fails, among other grounds, to account for the fact that the overwhelming majority of Court decisions speak to particular constituencies only. We assess the impact of the Supreme Court's decision in Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches on the geographic constituencies involved in the case. We interviewed a random sample of residents in the town of Center Moriches and in the surrounding county of Suffolk, New York, before and after the decision. Consistent with the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion (Petty and Cacioppo 1986), we find that high levels of information about the decision increases support for the Court's decision among those for whom the decision is relatively less salient.

AB - We argue that the standard methodology for assessing the impact of Supreme Court decisions on public opinion, which relies on national surveys to measure public attitudes before and after relevant Court decisions, fails, among other grounds, to account for the fact that the overwhelming majority of Court decisions speak to particular constituencies only. We assess the impact of the Supreme Court's decision in Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches on the geographic constituencies involved in the case. We interviewed a random sample of residents in the town of Center Moriches and in the surrounding county of Suffolk, New York, before and after the decision. Consistent with the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion (Petty and Cacioppo 1986), we find that high levels of information about the decision increases support for the Court's decision among those for whom the decision is relatively less salient.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030305732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030305732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0030305732

VL - 58

SP - 1079

EP - 1102

JO - Journal of Politics

JF - Journal of Politics

SN - 0022-3816

IS - 4

ER -