TY - JOUR
T1 - The Shape of Things
T2 - The Origin of Young Children’s Knowledge of the Names and Properties of Geometric Forms
AU - Verdine, Brian N.
AU - Lucca, Kelsey R.
AU - Golinkoff, Roberta M.
AU - Hirsh-Pasek, Kathryn
AU - Newcombe, Nora S.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health Stimulus Grant No. 1RC1HD0634970-01 to Roberta Michnick Golinkoff at the University of Delaware and Kathryn Hirsh-Pasek at Temple University and the National Science Foundation via the Spatial Intelligence and Learning Center (SBE-1041707).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2016/1/1
Y1 - 2016/1/1
N2 - How do toddlers learn the names of geometric forms? Previous work suggests that preschoolers have fragmentary knowledge and that defining properties are not understood until well into elementary school. The current study investigated when children first begin to understand shape names and how they apply those labels to unusual instances. We tested 25- and 30-month-old children’s (N = 30 each) understanding of names for canonical shapes (commonly encountered instances, e.g., equilateral triangles), noncanonical shapes (more irregular instances, e.g., scalene triangles), and embedded shapes (shapes within a larger picture, e.g., triangular slices of pizza). At 25 months, children knew very few names, including those for canonical shapes. By 30 months, however, children had acquired more shape names and were beginning to apply them to some of the less typical instances of the shapes. Possible mechanisms driving this initial development of shape knowledge and implications of that development for school readiness are explored.
AB - How do toddlers learn the names of geometric forms? Previous work suggests that preschoolers have fragmentary knowledge and that defining properties are not understood until well into elementary school. The current study investigated when children first begin to understand shape names and how they apply those labels to unusual instances. We tested 25- and 30-month-old children’s (N = 30 each) understanding of names for canonical shapes (commonly encountered instances, e.g., equilateral triangles), noncanonical shapes (more irregular instances, e.g., scalene triangles), and embedded shapes (shapes within a larger picture, e.g., triangular slices of pizza). At 25 months, children knew very few names, including those for canonical shapes. By 30 months, however, children had acquired more shape names and were beginning to apply them to some of the less typical instances of the shapes. Possible mechanisms driving this initial development of shape knowledge and implications of that development for school readiness are explored.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958034082&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958034082&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15248372.2015.1016610
DO - 10.1080/15248372.2015.1016610
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84958034082
SN - 1524-8372
VL - 17
SP - 142
EP - 161
JO - Journal of Cognition and Development
JF - Journal of Cognition and Development
IS - 1
ER -