The Sample Size-Richness Relation: The Relevance of Research Questions, Sampling Strategies, and Behavioral Variation

Stephen Plog, Michelle Hegmon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent discussions of the relation between sample size and assemblage richness suggest that researchers should control for that relation before behavioral interpretations of richness levels can proceed. We suggest that such automatic decisions should be avoided because a strong correlation between sample size and richness alone is not sufficient evidence for dismissing behavioral factors as the primary causes of the variation in richness. Instead, we must first explore the causes of the observed variation in sample size and the relation of those causes to our research questions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)489-496
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Antiquity
Volume58
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

cause
interpretation
evidence
Sample Size
Sampling Strategy
Causes
Assemblages

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Archaeology
  • Museology

Cite this

The Sample Size-Richness Relation : The Relevance of Research Questions, Sampling Strategies, and Behavioral Variation. / Plog, Stephen; Hegmon, Michelle.

In: American Antiquity, Vol. 58, No. 3, 01.07.1993, p. 489-496.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9550f7f73bf34ea2b5391276276c11bb,
title = "The Sample Size-Richness Relation: The Relevance of Research Questions, Sampling Strategies, and Behavioral Variation",
abstract = "Recent discussions of the relation between sample size and assemblage richness suggest that researchers should control for that relation before behavioral interpretations of richness levels can proceed. We suggest that such automatic decisions should be avoided because a strong correlation between sample size and richness alone is not sufficient evidence for dismissing behavioral factors as the primary causes of the variation in richness. Instead, we must first explore the causes of the observed variation in sample size and the relation of those causes to our research questions.",
author = "Stephen Plog and Michelle Hegmon",
year = "1993",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2307/282108",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "489--496",
journal = "American Antiquity",
issn = "0002-7316",
publisher = "Society for American Archaeology",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Sample Size-Richness Relation

T2 - The Relevance of Research Questions, Sampling Strategies, and Behavioral Variation

AU - Plog, Stephen

AU - Hegmon, Michelle

PY - 1993/7/1

Y1 - 1993/7/1

N2 - Recent discussions of the relation between sample size and assemblage richness suggest that researchers should control for that relation before behavioral interpretations of richness levels can proceed. We suggest that such automatic decisions should be avoided because a strong correlation between sample size and richness alone is not sufficient evidence for dismissing behavioral factors as the primary causes of the variation in richness. Instead, we must first explore the causes of the observed variation in sample size and the relation of those causes to our research questions.

AB - Recent discussions of the relation between sample size and assemblage richness suggest that researchers should control for that relation before behavioral interpretations of richness levels can proceed. We suggest that such automatic decisions should be avoided because a strong correlation between sample size and richness alone is not sufficient evidence for dismissing behavioral factors as the primary causes of the variation in richness. Instead, we must first explore the causes of the observed variation in sample size and the relation of those causes to our research questions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000959545&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000959545&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/282108

DO - 10.2307/282108

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0000959545

VL - 58

SP - 489

EP - 496

JO - American Antiquity

JF - American Antiquity

SN - 0002-7316

IS - 3

ER -