The role of reported emotion in real-life and hypothetical moral dilemmas

Eva E A Skoe, Nancy Eisenberg, Amanda Cumberland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To form a more complete picture of the complexity that underlies human morality, the connection between emotion and moral thought in 209 men and women was examined. Participants rated the importance of one real-life and three hypothetical moral dilemmas and their feelings while making decisions about the dilemmas. The responses on these dilemmas also were scored for their care and justice orientations. Results showed that feeling upset and sympathy were uniquely positively related to dilemma importance. In the real-life situations, sympathy and anger uniquely predicted both care (positively) and justice (negatively) orientations. Relational real-life dilemmas evoked more emotions than did nonrelational ones. In general, women scored higher than men on emotions when considering moral dilemmas.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)962-973
Number of pages12
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume28
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2002

Fingerprint

Emotions
Social Justice
Anger
Decision Making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

The role of reported emotion in real-life and hypothetical moral dilemmas. / Skoe, Eva E A; Eisenberg, Nancy; Cumberland, Amanda.

In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 7, 07.2002, p. 962-973.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c7d89f7461fc4a3db4e1e6640ab114a9,
title = "The role of reported emotion in real-life and hypothetical moral dilemmas",
abstract = "To form a more complete picture of the complexity that underlies human morality, the connection between emotion and moral thought in 209 men and women was examined. Participants rated the importance of one real-life and three hypothetical moral dilemmas and their feelings while making decisions about the dilemmas. The responses on these dilemmas also were scored for their care and justice orientations. Results showed that feeling upset and sympathy were uniquely positively related to dilemma importance. In the real-life situations, sympathy and anger uniquely predicted both care (positively) and justice (negatively) orientations. Relational real-life dilemmas evoked more emotions than did nonrelational ones. In general, women scored higher than men on emotions when considering moral dilemmas.",
author = "Skoe, {Eva E A} and Nancy Eisenberg and Amanda Cumberland",
year = "2002",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1177/01467202028007009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "962--973",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin",
issn = "0146-1672",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of reported emotion in real-life and hypothetical moral dilemmas

AU - Skoe, Eva E A

AU - Eisenberg, Nancy

AU - Cumberland, Amanda

PY - 2002/7

Y1 - 2002/7

N2 - To form a more complete picture of the complexity that underlies human morality, the connection between emotion and moral thought in 209 men and women was examined. Participants rated the importance of one real-life and three hypothetical moral dilemmas and their feelings while making decisions about the dilemmas. The responses on these dilemmas also were scored for their care and justice orientations. Results showed that feeling upset and sympathy were uniquely positively related to dilemma importance. In the real-life situations, sympathy and anger uniquely predicted both care (positively) and justice (negatively) orientations. Relational real-life dilemmas evoked more emotions than did nonrelational ones. In general, women scored higher than men on emotions when considering moral dilemmas.

AB - To form a more complete picture of the complexity that underlies human morality, the connection between emotion and moral thought in 209 men and women was examined. Participants rated the importance of one real-life and three hypothetical moral dilemmas and their feelings while making decisions about the dilemmas. The responses on these dilemmas also were scored for their care and justice orientations. Results showed that feeling upset and sympathy were uniquely positively related to dilemma importance. In the real-life situations, sympathy and anger uniquely predicted both care (positively) and justice (negatively) orientations. Relational real-life dilemmas evoked more emotions than did nonrelational ones. In general, women scored higher than men on emotions when considering moral dilemmas.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=9744257856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=9744257856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/01467202028007009

DO - 10.1177/01467202028007009

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 962

EP - 973

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

SN - 0146-1672

IS - 7

ER -