The role of paradox theory in decision making and management research

David Waldman, Linda L. Putnam, Ella Miron-Spektor, Donald Siegel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In this overview article, we contend that most theorizing and research on paradoxes has occurred at the organizational level. However, individuals and their social interactions often serve as the micro-foundations for higher level organizational paradoxes. Thus, it is becoming increasingly clear that a more complete consideration of paradoxes and their effect on management and organizations needs to take into account the individual and team levels of analyses. This special issue specifically targets these levels of analyses and includes seven articles that deal with such topics as leadership, conflict, escalation of commitment, and power. These articles emphasize multiple levels of analysis and also employ a variety of methodologies, including surveys, experiments, and qualitative discourse methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Interpersonal Relations
Decision Making
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires
Conflict (Psychology)
Power (Psychology)
Paradox
Management research
Decision making
Organizational level

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

The role of paradox theory in decision making and management research. / Waldman, David; Putnam, Linda L.; Miron-Spektor, Ella; Siegel, Donald.

In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b0a5f0061c5b415393db9415d2a00d88,
title = "The role of paradox theory in decision making and management research",
abstract = "In this overview article, we contend that most theorizing and research on paradoxes has occurred at the organizational level. However, individuals and their social interactions often serve as the micro-foundations for higher level organizational paradoxes. Thus, it is becoming increasingly clear that a more complete consideration of paradoxes and their effect on management and organizations needs to take into account the individual and team levels of analyses. This special issue specifically targets these levels of analyses and includes seven articles that deal with such topics as leadership, conflict, escalation of commitment, and power. These articles emphasize multiple levels of analysis and also employ a variety of methodologies, including surveys, experiments, and qualitative discourse methods.",
author = "David Waldman and Putnam, {Linda L.} and Ella Miron-Spektor and Donald Siegel",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.04.006",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes",
issn = "0749-5978",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of paradox theory in decision making and management research

AU - Waldman, David

AU - Putnam, Linda L.

AU - Miron-Spektor, Ella

AU - Siegel, Donald

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - In this overview article, we contend that most theorizing and research on paradoxes has occurred at the organizational level. However, individuals and their social interactions often serve as the micro-foundations for higher level organizational paradoxes. Thus, it is becoming increasingly clear that a more complete consideration of paradoxes and their effect on management and organizations needs to take into account the individual and team levels of analyses. This special issue specifically targets these levels of analyses and includes seven articles that deal with such topics as leadership, conflict, escalation of commitment, and power. These articles emphasize multiple levels of analysis and also employ a variety of methodologies, including surveys, experiments, and qualitative discourse methods.

AB - In this overview article, we contend that most theorizing and research on paradoxes has occurred at the organizational level. However, individuals and their social interactions often serve as the micro-foundations for higher level organizational paradoxes. Thus, it is becoming increasingly clear that a more complete consideration of paradoxes and their effect on management and organizations needs to take into account the individual and team levels of analyses. This special issue specifically targets these levels of analyses and includes seven articles that deal with such topics as leadership, conflict, escalation of commitment, and power. These articles emphasize multiple levels of analysis and also employ a variety of methodologies, including surveys, experiments, and qualitative discourse methods.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066939224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066939224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.04.006

DO - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.04.006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85066939224

JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

SN - 0749-5978

ER -