The role of collaborative interactions versus individual construction on students’ learning of engineering concepts

Muhsin Menekse, Michelene Chi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study primarily investigated the role of interactional factors in an unstructured face-to-face collaborative learning environment with challenging engineering activities. We explored dialogue patterns in terms of quality of interaction, students’ scaffolding instances, and discourse moves for productive interactions of collaborative dyads in the context of the Interactive-Constructive-Active-Passive (ICAP) framework. The sample included 72 engineering students for the interactive and constructive conditions. Students’ understanding of material science and engineering concepts were measured using pre and posttest design. Results showed students in the interactive condition performed significantly better than students in the constructive condition. Verbal analysis of approximately 12 hours video recordings and 210 pages of transcriptions for students’ dialogue in the interactive condition indicated a strong relation between the quality of interaction, scaffolding instances, and individual learning gains. In addition, a verbal analysis examining each utterance based on the discourse moves revealed that the certain moves are significantly linked with learning outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalEuropean Journal of Engineering Education
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Students
engineering
interaction
learning
student
dialogue
Video recording
discourse
video recording
Materials science
Transcription
dyad
learning environment
science

Keywords

  • active learning
  • assessment of learning outcomes
  • Engineering education research
  • peer learning/teaching
  • teamwork

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

@article{b6f0ad21080a4d08b522f41e02c964c0,
title = "The role of collaborative interactions versus individual construction on students’ learning of engineering concepts",
abstract = "This study primarily investigated the role of interactional factors in an unstructured face-to-face collaborative learning environment with challenging engineering activities. We explored dialogue patterns in terms of quality of interaction, students’ scaffolding instances, and discourse moves for productive interactions of collaborative dyads in the context of the Interactive-Constructive-Active-Passive (ICAP) framework. The sample included 72 engineering students for the interactive and constructive conditions. Students’ understanding of material science and engineering concepts were measured using pre and posttest design. Results showed students in the interactive condition performed significantly better than students in the constructive condition. Verbal analysis of approximately 12 hours video recordings and 210 pages of transcriptions for students’ dialogue in the interactive condition indicated a strong relation between the quality of interaction, scaffolding instances, and individual learning gains. In addition, a verbal analysis examining each utterance based on the discourse moves revealed that the certain moves are significantly linked with learning outcomes.",
keywords = "active learning, assessment of learning outcomes, Engineering education research, peer learning/teaching, teamwork",
author = "Muhsin Menekse and Michelene Chi",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/03043797.2018.1538324",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "European Journal of Engineering Education",
issn = "0304-3797",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of collaborative interactions versus individual construction on students’ learning of engineering concepts

AU - Menekse, Muhsin

AU - Chi, Michelene

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - This study primarily investigated the role of interactional factors in an unstructured face-to-face collaborative learning environment with challenging engineering activities. We explored dialogue patterns in terms of quality of interaction, students’ scaffolding instances, and discourse moves for productive interactions of collaborative dyads in the context of the Interactive-Constructive-Active-Passive (ICAP) framework. The sample included 72 engineering students for the interactive and constructive conditions. Students’ understanding of material science and engineering concepts were measured using pre and posttest design. Results showed students in the interactive condition performed significantly better than students in the constructive condition. Verbal analysis of approximately 12 hours video recordings and 210 pages of transcriptions for students’ dialogue in the interactive condition indicated a strong relation between the quality of interaction, scaffolding instances, and individual learning gains. In addition, a verbal analysis examining each utterance based on the discourse moves revealed that the certain moves are significantly linked with learning outcomes.

AB - This study primarily investigated the role of interactional factors in an unstructured face-to-face collaborative learning environment with challenging engineering activities. We explored dialogue patterns in terms of quality of interaction, students’ scaffolding instances, and discourse moves for productive interactions of collaborative dyads in the context of the Interactive-Constructive-Active-Passive (ICAP) framework. The sample included 72 engineering students for the interactive and constructive conditions. Students’ understanding of material science and engineering concepts were measured using pre and posttest design. Results showed students in the interactive condition performed significantly better than students in the constructive condition. Verbal analysis of approximately 12 hours video recordings and 210 pages of transcriptions for students’ dialogue in the interactive condition indicated a strong relation between the quality of interaction, scaffolding instances, and individual learning gains. In addition, a verbal analysis examining each utterance based on the discourse moves revealed that the certain moves are significantly linked with learning outcomes.

KW - active learning

KW - assessment of learning outcomes

KW - Engineering education research

KW - peer learning/teaching

KW - teamwork

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056161380&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056161380&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03043797.2018.1538324

DO - 10.1080/03043797.2018.1538324

M3 - Article

JO - European Journal of Engineering Education

JF - European Journal of Engineering Education

SN - 0304-3797

ER -