Abstract
This study primarily investigated the role of interactional factors in an unstructured face-to-face collaborative learning environment with challenging engineering activities. We explored dialogue patterns in terms of quality of interaction, students’ scaffolding instances, and discourse moves for productive interactions of collaborative dyads in the context of the Interactive-Constructive-Active-Passive (ICAP) framework. The sample included 72 engineering students for the interactive and constructive conditions. Students’ understanding of material science and engineering concepts were measured using pre and posttest design. Results showed students in the interactive condition performed significantly better than students in the constructive condition. Verbal analysis of approximately 12 hours video recordings and 210 pages of transcriptions for students’ dialogue in the interactive condition indicated a strong relation between the quality of interaction, scaffolding instances, and individual learning gains. In addition, a verbal analysis examining each utterance based on the discourse moves revealed that the certain moves are significantly linked with learning outcomes.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Journal | European Journal of Engineering Education |
| DOIs | |
| State | Accepted/In press - Jan 1 2018 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- active learning
- assessment of learning outcomes
- Engineering education research
- peer learning/teaching
- teamwork
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Education
- Engineering(all)
Cite this
The role of collaborative interactions versus individual construction on students’ learning of engineering concepts. / Menekse, Muhsin; Chi, Michelene.
In: European Journal of Engineering Education, 01.01.2018.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of collaborative interactions versus individual construction on students’ learning of engineering concepts
AU - Menekse, Muhsin
AU - Chi, Michelene
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - This study primarily investigated the role of interactional factors in an unstructured face-to-face collaborative learning environment with challenging engineering activities. We explored dialogue patterns in terms of quality of interaction, students’ scaffolding instances, and discourse moves for productive interactions of collaborative dyads in the context of the Interactive-Constructive-Active-Passive (ICAP) framework. The sample included 72 engineering students for the interactive and constructive conditions. Students’ understanding of material science and engineering concepts were measured using pre and posttest design. Results showed students in the interactive condition performed significantly better than students in the constructive condition. Verbal analysis of approximately 12 hours video recordings and 210 pages of transcriptions for students’ dialogue in the interactive condition indicated a strong relation between the quality of interaction, scaffolding instances, and individual learning gains. In addition, a verbal analysis examining each utterance based on the discourse moves revealed that the certain moves are significantly linked with learning outcomes.
AB - This study primarily investigated the role of interactional factors in an unstructured face-to-face collaborative learning environment with challenging engineering activities. We explored dialogue patterns in terms of quality of interaction, students’ scaffolding instances, and discourse moves for productive interactions of collaborative dyads in the context of the Interactive-Constructive-Active-Passive (ICAP) framework. The sample included 72 engineering students for the interactive and constructive conditions. Students’ understanding of material science and engineering concepts were measured using pre and posttest design. Results showed students in the interactive condition performed significantly better than students in the constructive condition. Verbal analysis of approximately 12 hours video recordings and 210 pages of transcriptions for students’ dialogue in the interactive condition indicated a strong relation between the quality of interaction, scaffolding instances, and individual learning gains. In addition, a verbal analysis examining each utterance based on the discourse moves revealed that the certain moves are significantly linked with learning outcomes.
KW - active learning
KW - assessment of learning outcomes
KW - Engineering education research
KW - peer learning/teaching
KW - teamwork
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056161380&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056161380&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/03043797.2018.1538324
DO - 10.1080/03043797.2018.1538324
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85056161380
JO - European Journal of Engineering Education
JF - European Journal of Engineering Education
SN - 0304-3797
ER -