The role of climate

implications for service employee engagement and customer service performance

Bulent Menguc, Sei Auh, Volkan Yeniaras, Constantine S. Katsikeas

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    14 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This research attempts to challenge the resource–engagement and engagement–performance linkage of the job demands–resources model by testing these links under the moderating role of two climates: performance-focused and service failure recovery. Two studies test a model on the boundary conditions of the linkages across four service industries. The results suggest that whether a resource (i.e., self-efficacy and job autonomy) positively or negatively affects engagement depends on whether (1) a climate is appraised as a challenge or hindrance demand and (2) a climate is deemed a complementary or compensatory resource. Using multi-respondent data from customer service employees and their supervisors in the health care industry, Study 1 conceptualizes climate as organizational climate and finds that performance-focused climate strengthens (weakens) the positive effect of self-efficacy (job autonomy) on engagement while service failure recovery climate weakens the positive impact of self-efficacy on engagement. Study 2 generalizes the findings from Study 1 and provides broad support by testing the model using psychological climate in the financial services, tourism and hospitality, and retailing industries. This study closes with a configuration approach to climate research by discussing when multiple climates can co-exist under different types of resources.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)428-451
    Number of pages24
    JournalJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science
    Volume45
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - May 1 2017

    Fingerprint

    Customer service
    Service employees
    Service performance
    Climate
    Employee engagement
    Self-efficacy
    Resources
    Linkage
    Job autonomy
    Service failure
    Testing
    Healthcare
    Industry
    Organizational climate
    Financial services
    Retailing
    Service industries
    Boundary conditions
    Tourism and hospitality
    Supervisors

    Keywords

    • Climate
    • Engagement
    • Job autonomy
    • Job demands–resources model
    • Self-efficacy
    • Service failure recovery

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Business and International Management
    • Economics and Econometrics
    • Marketing

    Cite this

    The role of climate : implications for service employee engagement and customer service performance. / Menguc, Bulent; Auh, Sei; Yeniaras, Volkan; Katsikeas, Constantine S.

    In: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 45, No. 3, 01.05.2017, p. 428-451.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Menguc, Bulent ; Auh, Sei ; Yeniaras, Volkan ; Katsikeas, Constantine S. / The role of climate : implications for service employee engagement and customer service performance. In: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2017 ; Vol. 45, No. 3. pp. 428-451.
    @article{879296506bf743ff8807ce4cdf5edd5d,
    title = "The role of climate: implications for service employee engagement and customer service performance",
    abstract = "This research attempts to challenge the resource–engagement and engagement–performance linkage of the job demands–resources model by testing these links under the moderating role of two climates: performance-focused and service failure recovery. Two studies test a model on the boundary conditions of the linkages across four service industries. The results suggest that whether a resource (i.e., self-efficacy and job autonomy) positively or negatively affects engagement depends on whether (1) a climate is appraised as a challenge or hindrance demand and (2) a climate is deemed a complementary or compensatory resource. Using multi-respondent data from customer service employees and their supervisors in the health care industry, Study 1 conceptualizes climate as organizational climate and finds that performance-focused climate strengthens (weakens) the positive effect of self-efficacy (job autonomy) on engagement while service failure recovery climate weakens the positive impact of self-efficacy on engagement. Study 2 generalizes the findings from Study 1 and provides broad support by testing the model using psychological climate in the financial services, tourism and hospitality, and retailing industries. This study closes with a configuration approach to climate research by discussing when multiple climates can co-exist under different types of resources.",
    keywords = "Climate, Engagement, Job autonomy, Job demands–resources model, Self-efficacy, Service failure recovery",
    author = "Bulent Menguc and Sei Auh and Volkan Yeniaras and Katsikeas, {Constantine S.}",
    year = "2017",
    month = "5",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1007/s11747-017-0526-9",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "45",
    pages = "428--451",
    journal = "Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science",
    issn = "0092-0703",
    publisher = "Springer New York",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The role of climate

    T2 - implications for service employee engagement and customer service performance

    AU - Menguc, Bulent

    AU - Auh, Sei

    AU - Yeniaras, Volkan

    AU - Katsikeas, Constantine S.

    PY - 2017/5/1

    Y1 - 2017/5/1

    N2 - This research attempts to challenge the resource–engagement and engagement–performance linkage of the job demands–resources model by testing these links under the moderating role of two climates: performance-focused and service failure recovery. Two studies test a model on the boundary conditions of the linkages across four service industries. The results suggest that whether a resource (i.e., self-efficacy and job autonomy) positively or negatively affects engagement depends on whether (1) a climate is appraised as a challenge or hindrance demand and (2) a climate is deemed a complementary or compensatory resource. Using multi-respondent data from customer service employees and their supervisors in the health care industry, Study 1 conceptualizes climate as organizational climate and finds that performance-focused climate strengthens (weakens) the positive effect of self-efficacy (job autonomy) on engagement while service failure recovery climate weakens the positive impact of self-efficacy on engagement. Study 2 generalizes the findings from Study 1 and provides broad support by testing the model using psychological climate in the financial services, tourism and hospitality, and retailing industries. This study closes with a configuration approach to climate research by discussing when multiple climates can co-exist under different types of resources.

    AB - This research attempts to challenge the resource–engagement and engagement–performance linkage of the job demands–resources model by testing these links under the moderating role of two climates: performance-focused and service failure recovery. Two studies test a model on the boundary conditions of the linkages across four service industries. The results suggest that whether a resource (i.e., self-efficacy and job autonomy) positively or negatively affects engagement depends on whether (1) a climate is appraised as a challenge or hindrance demand and (2) a climate is deemed a complementary or compensatory resource. Using multi-respondent data from customer service employees and their supervisors in the health care industry, Study 1 conceptualizes climate as organizational climate and finds that performance-focused climate strengthens (weakens) the positive effect of self-efficacy (job autonomy) on engagement while service failure recovery climate weakens the positive impact of self-efficacy on engagement. Study 2 generalizes the findings from Study 1 and provides broad support by testing the model using psychological climate in the financial services, tourism and hospitality, and retailing industries. This study closes with a configuration approach to climate research by discussing when multiple climates can co-exist under different types of resources.

    KW - Climate

    KW - Engagement

    KW - Job autonomy

    KW - Job demands–resources model

    KW - Self-efficacy

    KW - Service failure recovery

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015617374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015617374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/s11747-017-0526-9

    DO - 10.1007/s11747-017-0526-9

    M3 - Article

    VL - 45

    SP - 428

    EP - 451

    JO - Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

    JF - Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

    SN - 0092-0703

    IS - 3

    ER -