The Rise and Fall of the ICC in Libya and the Politics of International Surrogate Enforcership

Victor Peskin, Mieczyslaw P. Boduszynski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Under what conditions does the international community support the mission of global justice? Our article engages this question by examining the role played by international actors in the International Criminal Court (ICC) judicial intervention in Libya. While the international community and western states initially perceived the ICC as an effective diplomatic tool to delegitimize the Muammar Qadhafi regime, ensuing political developments during and after the 2011 war led these same states to retreat from their role as surrogate enforcers on behalf of the ICC. The Libya case is unique both for the high degree of consensus for an ICC referral in February 2011 and the subsequent sharp fall in support for The Hague-based Court. Drawing on fieldwork in Libya, The Hague, Brussels and Washington, DC, this article explains why changing diplomatic perceptions of the utility of the ICC's role in Libya undermined its effectiveness and legitimacy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberijw001
Pages (from-to)272-291
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Journal of Transitional Justice
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2016

Fingerprint

Libya
International Criminal Court
politics
political development
community
legitimacy
justice
regime

Keywords

  • Darfur/Sudan
  • International Criminal Court
  • Libya
  • Surrogate enforcership

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

The Rise and Fall of the ICC in Libya and the Politics of International Surrogate Enforcership. / Peskin, Victor; Boduszynski, Mieczyslaw P.

In: International Journal of Transitional Justice, Vol. 10, No. 2, ijw001, 01.07.2016, p. 272-291.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1fc36b48bf36406592c9f7f0bd7eed1e,
title = "The Rise and Fall of the ICC in Libya and the Politics of International Surrogate Enforcership",
abstract = "Under what conditions does the international community support the mission of global justice? Our article engages this question by examining the role played by international actors in the International Criminal Court (ICC) judicial intervention in Libya. While the international community and western states initially perceived the ICC as an effective diplomatic tool to delegitimize the Muammar Qadhafi regime, ensuing political developments during and after the 2011 war led these same states to retreat from their role as surrogate enforcers on behalf of the ICC. The Libya case is unique both for the high degree of consensus for an ICC referral in February 2011 and the subsequent sharp fall in support for The Hague-based Court. Drawing on fieldwork in Libya, The Hague, Brussels and Washington, DC, this article explains why changing diplomatic perceptions of the utility of the ICC's role in Libya undermined its effectiveness and legitimacy.",
keywords = "Darfur/Sudan, International Criminal Court, Libya, Surrogate enforcership",
author = "Victor Peskin and Boduszynski, {Mieczyslaw P.}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/ijtj/ijw001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "272--291",
journal = "The International Journal of Transitional Justice",
issn = "1752-7716",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Rise and Fall of the ICC in Libya and the Politics of International Surrogate Enforcership

AU - Peskin, Victor

AU - Boduszynski, Mieczyslaw P.

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Under what conditions does the international community support the mission of global justice? Our article engages this question by examining the role played by international actors in the International Criminal Court (ICC) judicial intervention in Libya. While the international community and western states initially perceived the ICC as an effective diplomatic tool to delegitimize the Muammar Qadhafi regime, ensuing political developments during and after the 2011 war led these same states to retreat from their role as surrogate enforcers on behalf of the ICC. The Libya case is unique both for the high degree of consensus for an ICC referral in February 2011 and the subsequent sharp fall in support for The Hague-based Court. Drawing on fieldwork in Libya, The Hague, Brussels and Washington, DC, this article explains why changing diplomatic perceptions of the utility of the ICC's role in Libya undermined its effectiveness and legitimacy.

AB - Under what conditions does the international community support the mission of global justice? Our article engages this question by examining the role played by international actors in the International Criminal Court (ICC) judicial intervention in Libya. While the international community and western states initially perceived the ICC as an effective diplomatic tool to delegitimize the Muammar Qadhafi regime, ensuing political developments during and after the 2011 war led these same states to retreat from their role as surrogate enforcers on behalf of the ICC. The Libya case is unique both for the high degree of consensus for an ICC referral in February 2011 and the subsequent sharp fall in support for The Hague-based Court. Drawing on fieldwork in Libya, The Hague, Brussels and Washington, DC, this article explains why changing diplomatic perceptions of the utility of the ICC's role in Libya undermined its effectiveness and legitimacy.

KW - Darfur/Sudan

KW - International Criminal Court

KW - Libya

KW - Surrogate enforcership

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977138463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84977138463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ijtj/ijw001

DO - 10.1093/ijtj/ijw001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84977138463

VL - 10

SP - 272

EP - 291

JO - The International Journal of Transitional Justice

JF - The International Journal of Transitional Justice

SN - 1752-7716

IS - 2

M1 - ijw001

ER -