The repression of dissent: A substitution model of government coercion

Will H. Moore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

164 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article describes a substitution model of states' responses to dissident behavior and a statistical test of some sequential hypotheses that are derived from the model. It is motivated by an interest in understanding the sequential response of states to dissident activity. That is, if dissidents protest, what will the state do next? Similarly, if dissidents are cooperative, what will the state do next? The author argues that the answer to both of these questions depends on the interaction of the state's most recent behavior (i.e., repression or accommodation) and the dissident's response. The model produces the hypothesis that states substitute repression for accommodation, and vice versa, in response to dissident protest. Statistical analysis of evidence from Peru and Sri Lanka, 1955 to 1991, suggests that the model captures well the sequential responses of the Peruvian and Sri Lankan governments to dissident behavior during that period.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)107-127
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Conflict Resolution
Volume44
Issue number1
StatePublished - Feb 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

dissident
repression
substitution
accommodation
protest
statistical test
Sri Lanka
Substitution
Dissent
Government
Coercion
Peru
statistical analysis
interaction
evidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

The repression of dissent : A substitution model of government coercion. / Moore, Will H.

In: Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 44, No. 1, 02.2000, p. 107-127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ea8b63802aef4edfa8f087bfa9378ea4,
title = "The repression of dissent: A substitution model of government coercion",
abstract = "This article describes a substitution model of states' responses to dissident behavior and a statistical test of some sequential hypotheses that are derived from the model. It is motivated by an interest in understanding the sequential response of states to dissident activity. That is, if dissidents protest, what will the state do next? Similarly, if dissidents are cooperative, what will the state do next? The author argues that the answer to both of these questions depends on the interaction of the state's most recent behavior (i.e., repression or accommodation) and the dissident's response. The model produces the hypothesis that states substitute repression for accommodation, and vice versa, in response to dissident protest. Statistical analysis of evidence from Peru and Sri Lanka, 1955 to 1991, suggests that the model captures well the sequential responses of the Peruvian and Sri Lankan governments to dissident behavior during that period.",
author = "Moore, {Will H.}",
year = "2000",
month = "2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "107--127",
journal = "Journal of Conflict Resolution",
issn = "0022-0027",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The repression of dissent

T2 - A substitution model of government coercion

AU - Moore, Will H.

PY - 2000/2

Y1 - 2000/2

N2 - This article describes a substitution model of states' responses to dissident behavior and a statistical test of some sequential hypotheses that are derived from the model. It is motivated by an interest in understanding the sequential response of states to dissident activity. That is, if dissidents protest, what will the state do next? Similarly, if dissidents are cooperative, what will the state do next? The author argues that the answer to both of these questions depends on the interaction of the state's most recent behavior (i.e., repression or accommodation) and the dissident's response. The model produces the hypothesis that states substitute repression for accommodation, and vice versa, in response to dissident protest. Statistical analysis of evidence from Peru and Sri Lanka, 1955 to 1991, suggests that the model captures well the sequential responses of the Peruvian and Sri Lankan governments to dissident behavior during that period.

AB - This article describes a substitution model of states' responses to dissident behavior and a statistical test of some sequential hypotheses that are derived from the model. It is motivated by an interest in understanding the sequential response of states to dissident activity. That is, if dissidents protest, what will the state do next? Similarly, if dissidents are cooperative, what will the state do next? The author argues that the answer to both of these questions depends on the interaction of the state's most recent behavior (i.e., repression or accommodation) and the dissident's response. The model produces the hypothesis that states substitute repression for accommodation, and vice versa, in response to dissident protest. Statistical analysis of evidence from Peru and Sri Lanka, 1955 to 1991, suggests that the model captures well the sequential responses of the Peruvian and Sri Lankan governments to dissident behavior during that period.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=22844453856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=22844453856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:22844453856

VL - 44

SP - 107

EP - 127

JO - Journal of Conflict Resolution

JF - Journal of Conflict Resolution

SN - 0022-0027

IS - 1

ER -