The representation of space in metal models derived from text

William Langston, Douglas C. Kramer, Arthur Glenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mental models of text are representations of what the text is about (i.e., situations), rather than representations of the text itself. Many mental model theories propose that mental models, like real situations, are played out in a medium analogous to a Euclidean space so that distance has functional consequences. For example, when one mentally manipulates one element of the representation, one will notice other elements that are spatially close to it, and its will enhance their short-term accessibility. In a test of this noticing hypothesis, participants read texts that described the object-by-object construction of a spatial layout. According to the text, a critical object ended up close to a target object (in the spatial layout) or far from the target object. In neither case, however, was the relation between the critical object and the target object explicitly described in the text. The noticing hypothesis predicts that the accessibility of the target object will be enhanced when the critical object is close to it. We tested this prediction in seven experiments in which we also manipulated the number of objects described, whether the description was accompanied by a diagram, the presentation modality of the description, the number of dimensions in the spatial layout, and the measurement of accessibility. We failed to find consistent support for the noticing hypothesis. The data compel the conclusions that (1) spatial representations can be formed when one is reading, (2) these representations do not support automatic noticing of implicit spatial relations, (3) it is likely that the spatial representation is more topological or functional than Euclidean.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)247-262
Number of pages16
JournalMemory and Cognition
Volume26
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reading
Metals
Noticing
Accessibility
Layout

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

The representation of space in metal models derived from text. / Langston, William; Kramer, Douglas C.; Glenberg, Arthur.

In: Memory and Cognition, Vol. 26, No. 2, 03.1998, p. 247-262.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Langston, W, Kramer, DC & Glenberg, A 1998, 'The representation of space in metal models derived from text', Memory and Cognition, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 247-262.
Langston, William ; Kramer, Douglas C. ; Glenberg, Arthur. / The representation of space in metal models derived from text. In: Memory and Cognition. 1998 ; Vol. 26, No. 2. pp. 247-262.
@article{c7c6eb51fc32428dae8297e758f0c4bc,
title = "The representation of space in metal models derived from text",
abstract = "Mental models of text are representations of what the text is about (i.e., situations), rather than representations of the text itself. Many mental model theories propose that mental models, like real situations, are played out in a medium analogous to a Euclidean space so that distance has functional consequences. For example, when one mentally manipulates one element of the representation, one will notice other elements that are spatially close to it, and its will enhance their short-term accessibility. In a test of this noticing hypothesis, participants read texts that described the object-by-object construction of a spatial layout. According to the text, a critical object ended up close to a target object (in the spatial layout) or far from the target object. In neither case, however, was the relation between the critical object and the target object explicitly described in the text. The noticing hypothesis predicts that the accessibility of the target object will be enhanced when the critical object is close to it. We tested this prediction in seven experiments in which we also manipulated the number of objects described, whether the description was accompanied by a diagram, the presentation modality of the description, the number of dimensions in the spatial layout, and the measurement of accessibility. We failed to find consistent support for the noticing hypothesis. The data compel the conclusions that (1) spatial representations can be formed when one is reading, (2) these representations do not support automatic noticing of implicit spatial relations, (3) it is likely that the spatial representation is more topological or functional than Euclidean.",
author = "William Langston and Kramer, {Douglas C.} and Arthur Glenberg",
year = "1998",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "247--262",
journal = "Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0090-502X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The representation of space in metal models derived from text

AU - Langston, William

AU - Kramer, Douglas C.

AU - Glenberg, Arthur

PY - 1998/3

Y1 - 1998/3

N2 - Mental models of text are representations of what the text is about (i.e., situations), rather than representations of the text itself. Many mental model theories propose that mental models, like real situations, are played out in a medium analogous to a Euclidean space so that distance has functional consequences. For example, when one mentally manipulates one element of the representation, one will notice other elements that are spatially close to it, and its will enhance their short-term accessibility. In a test of this noticing hypothesis, participants read texts that described the object-by-object construction of a spatial layout. According to the text, a critical object ended up close to a target object (in the spatial layout) or far from the target object. In neither case, however, was the relation between the critical object and the target object explicitly described in the text. The noticing hypothesis predicts that the accessibility of the target object will be enhanced when the critical object is close to it. We tested this prediction in seven experiments in which we also manipulated the number of objects described, whether the description was accompanied by a diagram, the presentation modality of the description, the number of dimensions in the spatial layout, and the measurement of accessibility. We failed to find consistent support for the noticing hypothesis. The data compel the conclusions that (1) spatial representations can be formed when one is reading, (2) these representations do not support automatic noticing of implicit spatial relations, (3) it is likely that the spatial representation is more topological or functional than Euclidean.

AB - Mental models of text are representations of what the text is about (i.e., situations), rather than representations of the text itself. Many mental model theories propose that mental models, like real situations, are played out in a medium analogous to a Euclidean space so that distance has functional consequences. For example, when one mentally manipulates one element of the representation, one will notice other elements that are spatially close to it, and its will enhance their short-term accessibility. In a test of this noticing hypothesis, participants read texts that described the object-by-object construction of a spatial layout. According to the text, a critical object ended up close to a target object (in the spatial layout) or far from the target object. In neither case, however, was the relation between the critical object and the target object explicitly described in the text. The noticing hypothesis predicts that the accessibility of the target object will be enhanced when the critical object is close to it. We tested this prediction in seven experiments in which we also manipulated the number of objects described, whether the description was accompanied by a diagram, the presentation modality of the description, the number of dimensions in the spatial layout, and the measurement of accessibility. We failed to find consistent support for the noticing hypothesis. The data compel the conclusions that (1) spatial representations can be formed when one is reading, (2) these representations do not support automatic noticing of implicit spatial relations, (3) it is likely that the spatial representation is more topological or functional than Euclidean.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031596920&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031596920&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9584433

AN - SCOPUS:0031596920

VL - 26

SP - 247

EP - 262

JO - Memory and Cognition

JF - Memory and Cognition

SN - 0090-502X

IS - 2

ER -