Within the bureaucratic performance literature, a growing body of work focuses on the relationship between the character of an administrator's selection - career administrators versus different types of appointees - and bureaucratic performance, finding that programs managed by political appointees are associated with lower performance scores than programs managed by career professionals. One aspect of administrators' selection that has not been considered in connection with bureaucratic performance is whether the appointee was installed via recess appointment. Because their limited and uncertain tenures may cause administrative problems and because the unilateral nature of their selection may lead executives to prioritize other characteristics over competency, I theorize that recess appointees will be associated with lower program performance than non-recess appointees and careerists. Using Program Assessment Rating Tool scores from the George W. Bush administration, I find support for this expectation. This article contributes to our understanding of the ways in which staffing through recess appointments may shape government administration.
|Original language||English (US)|
|Number of pages||20|
|Journal||Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory|
|State||Published - Jul 1 2015|
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science
- Public Administration