The Relationship Between School Administrator and Teacher Ratings of Classroom Practices and Student Achievement in High-Poverty Schools

Linda A. Reddy, Anh N. Hua, Christopher M. Dudek, Ryan Kettler, Ilona Arnold-Berkovits, Adam Lekwa, Kevin Crouse, Alexander Kurz, Jiefang Hu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study examined the relationship of school administrator and teacher self-ratings of instructional and behavioral management practices to student growth on statewide achievement tests (Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Career [PARCC]). The study included 78 teachers and 1,594 students from fourth through eighth grades in nine high-poverty charter schools. Observation scores completed by school administrator and teacher self-ratings were collected on the Classroom Strategies Assessment System (CSAS), an observational assessment that reports outcomes as discrepancy scores: differences between recommended frequency and observed frequency of specific instructional and behavior management strategies for teachers. Correlations revealed negative relations between both informants’ discrepancy scores and PARCC growth scores, demonstrating that teachers with lower discrepancy scores tended to have students with greater PARCC growth scores. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses revealed school administrator and teacher CSAS total discrepancy scores were related to student performance on PARCC mathematics, but not English Language Arts (ELA), and teachers’ CSAS Total discrepancy scores explained an additional 4.8% of variance in PARCC mathematics. Implications of findings for professional development and research are offered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAssessment for Effective Intervention
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

teacher rating
Poverty
Administrative Personnel
poverty
Students
classroom
Mathematics
school
Language Arts
teacher
career
Growth
student
Practice Management
Regression Analysis
Observation
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
rating
mathematics
School Teachers

Keywords

  • achievement assessment
  • instruction
  • progress monitoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

The Relationship Between School Administrator and Teacher Ratings of Classroom Practices and Student Achievement in High-Poverty Schools. / Reddy, Linda A.; Hua, Anh N.; Dudek, Christopher M.; Kettler, Ryan; Arnold-Berkovits, Ilona; Lekwa, Adam; Crouse, Kevin; Kurz, Alexander; Hu, Jiefang.

In: Assessment for Effective Intervention, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Reddy, Linda A. ; Hua, Anh N. ; Dudek, Christopher M. ; Kettler, Ryan ; Arnold-Berkovits, Ilona ; Lekwa, Adam ; Crouse, Kevin ; Kurz, Alexander ; Hu, Jiefang. / The Relationship Between School Administrator and Teacher Ratings of Classroom Practices and Student Achievement in High-Poverty Schools. In: Assessment for Effective Intervention. 2019.
@article{c16bcee86b20422c8f42ebdff51e3903,
title = "The Relationship Between School Administrator and Teacher Ratings of Classroom Practices and Student Achievement in High-Poverty Schools",
abstract = "This study examined the relationship of school administrator and teacher self-ratings of instructional and behavioral management practices to student growth on statewide achievement tests (Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Career [PARCC]). The study included 78 teachers and 1,594 students from fourth through eighth grades in nine high-poverty charter schools. Observation scores completed by school administrator and teacher self-ratings were collected on the Classroom Strategies Assessment System (CSAS), an observational assessment that reports outcomes as discrepancy scores: differences between recommended frequency and observed frequency of specific instructional and behavior management strategies for teachers. Correlations revealed negative relations between both informants’ discrepancy scores and PARCC growth scores, demonstrating that teachers with lower discrepancy scores tended to have students with greater PARCC growth scores. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses revealed school administrator and teacher CSAS total discrepancy scores were related to student performance on PARCC mathematics, but not English Language Arts (ELA), and teachers’ CSAS Total discrepancy scores explained an additional 4.8{\%} of variance in PARCC mathematics. Implications of findings for professional development and research are offered.",
keywords = "achievement assessment, instruction, progress monitoring",
author = "Reddy, {Linda A.} and Hua, {Anh N.} and Dudek, {Christopher M.} and Ryan Kettler and Ilona Arnold-Berkovits and Adam Lekwa and Kevin Crouse and Alexander Kurz and Jiefang Hu",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1534508419862863",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Assessment for Effective Intervention",
issn = "1534-5084",
publisher = "Council for Exceptional Children, Council for Educational Diagnostic Services",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Relationship Between School Administrator and Teacher Ratings of Classroom Practices and Student Achievement in High-Poverty Schools

AU - Reddy, Linda A.

AU - Hua, Anh N.

AU - Dudek, Christopher M.

AU - Kettler, Ryan

AU - Arnold-Berkovits, Ilona

AU - Lekwa, Adam

AU - Crouse, Kevin

AU - Kurz, Alexander

AU - Hu, Jiefang

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - This study examined the relationship of school administrator and teacher self-ratings of instructional and behavioral management practices to student growth on statewide achievement tests (Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Career [PARCC]). The study included 78 teachers and 1,594 students from fourth through eighth grades in nine high-poverty charter schools. Observation scores completed by school administrator and teacher self-ratings were collected on the Classroom Strategies Assessment System (CSAS), an observational assessment that reports outcomes as discrepancy scores: differences between recommended frequency and observed frequency of specific instructional and behavior management strategies for teachers. Correlations revealed negative relations between both informants’ discrepancy scores and PARCC growth scores, demonstrating that teachers with lower discrepancy scores tended to have students with greater PARCC growth scores. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses revealed school administrator and teacher CSAS total discrepancy scores were related to student performance on PARCC mathematics, but not English Language Arts (ELA), and teachers’ CSAS Total discrepancy scores explained an additional 4.8% of variance in PARCC mathematics. Implications of findings for professional development and research are offered.

AB - This study examined the relationship of school administrator and teacher self-ratings of instructional and behavioral management practices to student growth on statewide achievement tests (Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Career [PARCC]). The study included 78 teachers and 1,594 students from fourth through eighth grades in nine high-poverty charter schools. Observation scores completed by school administrator and teacher self-ratings were collected on the Classroom Strategies Assessment System (CSAS), an observational assessment that reports outcomes as discrepancy scores: differences between recommended frequency and observed frequency of specific instructional and behavior management strategies for teachers. Correlations revealed negative relations between both informants’ discrepancy scores and PARCC growth scores, demonstrating that teachers with lower discrepancy scores tended to have students with greater PARCC growth scores. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses revealed school administrator and teacher CSAS total discrepancy scores were related to student performance on PARCC mathematics, but not English Language Arts (ELA), and teachers’ CSAS Total discrepancy scores explained an additional 4.8% of variance in PARCC mathematics. Implications of findings for professional development and research are offered.

KW - achievement assessment

KW - instruction

KW - progress monitoring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070219094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070219094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1534508419862863

DO - 10.1177/1534508419862863

M3 - Article

JO - Assessment for Effective Intervention

JF - Assessment for Effective Intervention

SN - 1534-5084

ER -