The relation of attachment security status to effortful self-regulation: A meta-analysis

Susanna Pallini, Antonio Chirumbolo, Mara Morelli, Roberto Baiocco, Fiorenzo Laghi, Nancy Eisenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Secure attachment relationships have been described as having a regulatory function in regard to children's emotions, social cognition, and behavior. Although some theorists and researchers have argued that attachment affects children's self-regulation, most attachment theorists have not strongly emphasized this association. The goal of the current meta-analysis was to determine the magnitude of the relation between attachment security status and effortful control (EC)/top-down self-regulation in children up to 18 years of age. One hundred six papers met the inclusion criteria and 101 independent samples were used in analyses. When secure attachment status was compared with insecure attachment status, a significant relation (effect size [ES]) with EC favoring children with a secure attachment was found (100 studies; 20,350 participants; r=.20). A stronger relation was found when the same coder evaluated attachment than when the coder was different and when the measure of attachment was continuous; other moderators were not significant. Securely attached children were higher in EC than their avoidant (r=.10) or resistant (r=.17) counterparts. Children with organized attachments were higher in EC than those with disorganized attachments (r=.17), although this finding could be due to publication bias. For some comparisons of subgroups (B vs. A, B vs. C, and/or D vs. all others), moderation was found by source of information (higher ES for same reporter), age at assessment of EC and/or attachment (higher ES at older ages), method of attachment (lower ES for observational measures), time difference between assessments or research design (higher ESs for smaller time differences and concurrent findings), and published versus unpublished studies (higher ES for unpublished studies for A vs. B).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)501-531
Number of pages31
JournalPsychological Bulletin
Volume144
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Publication Bias
Cognition
Self-Control
Emotions
Research Design
Down-Regulation
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Attachment.
  • Effortful self-regulation.
  • Internal working models.
  • Meta-analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

The relation of attachment security status to effortful self-regulation : A meta-analysis. / Pallini, Susanna; Chirumbolo, Antonio; Morelli, Mara; Baiocco, Roberto; Laghi, Fiorenzo; Eisenberg, Nancy.

In: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 144, No. 5, 01.05.2018, p. 501-531.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pallini, Susanna ; Chirumbolo, Antonio ; Morelli, Mara ; Baiocco, Roberto ; Laghi, Fiorenzo ; Eisenberg, Nancy. / The relation of attachment security status to effortful self-regulation : A meta-analysis. In: Psychological Bulletin. 2018 ; Vol. 144, No. 5. pp. 501-531.
@article{6850aaefcc244098b07cd5a6a2c0f0c8,
title = "The relation of attachment security status to effortful self-regulation: A meta-analysis",
abstract = "Secure attachment relationships have been described as having a regulatory function in regard to children's emotions, social cognition, and behavior. Although some theorists and researchers have argued that attachment affects children's self-regulation, most attachment theorists have not strongly emphasized this association. The goal of the current meta-analysis was to determine the magnitude of the relation between attachment security status and effortful control (EC)/top-down self-regulation in children up to 18 years of age. One hundred six papers met the inclusion criteria and 101 independent samples were used in analyses. When secure attachment status was compared with insecure attachment status, a significant relation (effect size [ES]) with EC favoring children with a secure attachment was found (100 studies; 20,350 participants; r=.20). A stronger relation was found when the same coder evaluated attachment than when the coder was different and when the measure of attachment was continuous; other moderators were not significant. Securely attached children were higher in EC than their avoidant (r=.10) or resistant (r=.17) counterparts. Children with organized attachments were higher in EC than those with disorganized attachments (r=.17), although this finding could be due to publication bias. For some comparisons of subgroups (B vs. A, B vs. C, and/or D vs. all others), moderation was found by source of information (higher ES for same reporter), age at assessment of EC and/or attachment (higher ES at older ages), method of attachment (lower ES for observational measures), time difference between assessments or research design (higher ESs for smaller time differences and concurrent findings), and published versus unpublished studies (higher ES for unpublished studies for A vs. B).",
keywords = "Attachment., Effortful self-regulation., Internal working models., Meta-analysis",
author = "Susanna Pallini and Antonio Chirumbolo and Mara Morelli and Roberto Baiocco and Fiorenzo Laghi and Nancy Eisenberg",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/bul0000134",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "144",
pages = "501--531",
journal = "Psychological Bulletin",
issn = "0033-2909",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The relation of attachment security status to effortful self-regulation

T2 - A meta-analysis

AU - Pallini, Susanna

AU - Chirumbolo, Antonio

AU - Morelli, Mara

AU - Baiocco, Roberto

AU - Laghi, Fiorenzo

AU - Eisenberg, Nancy

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Secure attachment relationships have been described as having a regulatory function in regard to children's emotions, social cognition, and behavior. Although some theorists and researchers have argued that attachment affects children's self-regulation, most attachment theorists have not strongly emphasized this association. The goal of the current meta-analysis was to determine the magnitude of the relation between attachment security status and effortful control (EC)/top-down self-regulation in children up to 18 years of age. One hundred six papers met the inclusion criteria and 101 independent samples were used in analyses. When secure attachment status was compared with insecure attachment status, a significant relation (effect size [ES]) with EC favoring children with a secure attachment was found (100 studies; 20,350 participants; r=.20). A stronger relation was found when the same coder evaluated attachment than when the coder was different and when the measure of attachment was continuous; other moderators were not significant. Securely attached children were higher in EC than their avoidant (r=.10) or resistant (r=.17) counterparts. Children with organized attachments were higher in EC than those with disorganized attachments (r=.17), although this finding could be due to publication bias. For some comparisons of subgroups (B vs. A, B vs. C, and/or D vs. all others), moderation was found by source of information (higher ES for same reporter), age at assessment of EC and/or attachment (higher ES at older ages), method of attachment (lower ES for observational measures), time difference between assessments or research design (higher ESs for smaller time differences and concurrent findings), and published versus unpublished studies (higher ES for unpublished studies for A vs. B).

AB - Secure attachment relationships have been described as having a regulatory function in regard to children's emotions, social cognition, and behavior. Although some theorists and researchers have argued that attachment affects children's self-regulation, most attachment theorists have not strongly emphasized this association. The goal of the current meta-analysis was to determine the magnitude of the relation between attachment security status and effortful control (EC)/top-down self-regulation in children up to 18 years of age. One hundred six papers met the inclusion criteria and 101 independent samples were used in analyses. When secure attachment status was compared with insecure attachment status, a significant relation (effect size [ES]) with EC favoring children with a secure attachment was found (100 studies; 20,350 participants; r=.20). A stronger relation was found when the same coder evaluated attachment than when the coder was different and when the measure of attachment was continuous; other moderators were not significant. Securely attached children were higher in EC than their avoidant (r=.10) or resistant (r=.17) counterparts. Children with organized attachments were higher in EC than those with disorganized attachments (r=.17), although this finding could be due to publication bias. For some comparisons of subgroups (B vs. A, B vs. C, and/or D vs. all others), moderation was found by source of information (higher ES for same reporter), age at assessment of EC and/or attachment (higher ES at older ages), method of attachment (lower ES for observational measures), time difference between assessments or research design (higher ESs for smaller time differences and concurrent findings), and published versus unpublished studies (higher ES for unpublished studies for A vs. B).

KW - Attachment.

KW - Effortful self-regulation.

KW - Internal working models.

KW - Meta-analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043299913&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043299913&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/bul0000134

DO - 10.1037/bul0000134

M3 - Article

C2 - 29517260

AN - SCOPUS:85043299913

VL - 144

SP - 501

EP - 531

JO - Psychological Bulletin

JF - Psychological Bulletin

SN - 0033-2909

IS - 5

ER -