The public informing upstream engineering: A participatory technology assessment of NASA’s asteroid initiative

Zachary Pirtle, Jason Kessler, Erin Mahoney, Amy Kaminski, David Tomblin, Rick Worthington, Gretchen Gano, Mahmud Farooque, David Sittenfeld, David Guston

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Participatory technology assessment (pTA) is a methodology that seeks to gain public perspective such that it can inform government decision-making. For engineering activities that are in the early stages of preliminary design, or in what Fisher et al. might call ‘upstream’ engineering, pTA can be particularly useful in informing technical decision-making. We will discuss an experiment in using pTA to inform upstream engineering. In partnership with NASA, the Expert and Citizen Assessment of Science and Technology (ECAST) network conducted a pTA-based forum on NASA’s Asteroid Initatiative and other possible missions that could follow from it (e.g., Mars). The goal of the forum was to assess citizens’ values and their preferences about potential detection, mitigation, and exploration-based technologies associated with NASA’s Asteroid Initiative. ECAST organized two citizen forums in Phoenix, Arizona, and Boston, Massachusetts, in November 2014, with a total of 183 citizens selected by ECAST to reflect to rough order the demographics of each city. The forums included sessions on planetary defense, NASA’s Asteroid Redirect Mission, and Mars exploration. This paper focuses on the Mars exploration session. Citizens were given background information about three potential Mars missions that NASA could carry out and then engaged in structured facilitated discussions about their preferences: 1) Crewed orbital mission to direct robots on the surface of Mars; 2) short exploratory crewed mission to Mars surface; and 3) establishing a permanent settlement on Mars. In this paper, we will assess values and perceptions the public had about different Mars exploration options. We will also present results on the public’s perception of mission planning needs for NASA. These results show a complex set of values that may be relevant for NASA managers examining planning to go to Mars.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAIAA SPACE 2015 Conference and Exposition
PublisherAmerican Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA
ISBN (Print)9781624103346
StatePublished - 2015
EventAIAA SPACE Conference and Exposition, 2015 - Pasadena, United States
Duration: Aug 31 2015Sep 2 2015

Other

OtherAIAA SPACE Conference and Exposition, 2015
CountryUnited States
CityPasadena
Period8/31/159/2/15

Fingerprint

technology assessment
Asteroids
asteroids
Mars exploration
asteroid
mars
upstream
NASA
Mars
engineering
decision making
asteroid missions
Mars surface
Mars missions
mission planning
science and technology
Phoenix (AZ)
robots
planning
Decision making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Space and Planetary Science
  • Aerospace Engineering

Cite this

Pirtle, Z., Kessler, J., Mahoney, E., Kaminski, A., Tomblin, D., Worthington, R., ... Guston, D. (2015). The public informing upstream engineering: A participatory technology assessment of NASA’s asteroid initiative. In AIAA SPACE 2015 Conference and Exposition American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA.

The public informing upstream engineering : A participatory technology assessment of NASA’s asteroid initiative. / Pirtle, Zachary; Kessler, Jason; Mahoney, Erin; Kaminski, Amy; Tomblin, David; Worthington, Rick; Gano, Gretchen; Farooque, Mahmud; Sittenfeld, David; Guston, David.

AIAA SPACE 2015 Conference and Exposition. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA, 2015.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Pirtle, Z, Kessler, J, Mahoney, E, Kaminski, A, Tomblin, D, Worthington, R, Gano, G, Farooque, M, Sittenfeld, D & Guston, D 2015, The public informing upstream engineering: A participatory technology assessment of NASA’s asteroid initiative. in AIAA SPACE 2015 Conference and Exposition. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA, AIAA SPACE Conference and Exposition, 2015, Pasadena, United States, 8/31/15.
Pirtle Z, Kessler J, Mahoney E, Kaminski A, Tomblin D, Worthington R et al. The public informing upstream engineering: A participatory technology assessment of NASA’s asteroid initiative. In AIAA SPACE 2015 Conference and Exposition. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA. 2015
Pirtle, Zachary ; Kessler, Jason ; Mahoney, Erin ; Kaminski, Amy ; Tomblin, David ; Worthington, Rick ; Gano, Gretchen ; Farooque, Mahmud ; Sittenfeld, David ; Guston, David. / The public informing upstream engineering : A participatory technology assessment of NASA’s asteroid initiative. AIAA SPACE 2015 Conference and Exposition. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA, 2015.
@inproceedings{f673e6eaf2644bc38442881fa679c7e5,
title = "The public informing upstream engineering: A participatory technology assessment of NASA’s asteroid initiative",
abstract = "Participatory technology assessment (pTA) is a methodology that seeks to gain public perspective such that it can inform government decision-making. For engineering activities that are in the early stages of preliminary design, or in what Fisher et al. might call ‘upstream’ engineering, pTA can be particularly useful in informing technical decision-making. We will discuss an experiment in using pTA to inform upstream engineering. In partnership with NASA, the Expert and Citizen Assessment of Science and Technology (ECAST) network conducted a pTA-based forum on NASA’s Asteroid Initatiative and other possible missions that could follow from it (e.g., Mars). The goal of the forum was to assess citizens’ values and their preferences about potential detection, mitigation, and exploration-based technologies associated with NASA’s Asteroid Initiative. ECAST organized two citizen forums in Phoenix, Arizona, and Boston, Massachusetts, in November 2014, with a total of 183 citizens selected by ECAST to reflect to rough order the demographics of each city. The forums included sessions on planetary defense, NASA’s Asteroid Redirect Mission, and Mars exploration. This paper focuses on the Mars exploration session. Citizens were given background information about three potential Mars missions that NASA could carry out and then engaged in structured facilitated discussions about their preferences: 1) Crewed orbital mission to direct robots on the surface of Mars; 2) short exploratory crewed mission to Mars surface; and 3) establishing a permanent settlement on Mars. In this paper, we will assess values and perceptions the public had about different Mars exploration options. We will also present results on the public’s perception of mission planning needs for NASA. These results show a complex set of values that may be relevant for NASA managers examining planning to go to Mars.",
author = "Zachary Pirtle and Jason Kessler and Erin Mahoney and Amy Kaminski and David Tomblin and Rick Worthington and Gretchen Gano and Mahmud Farooque and David Sittenfeld and David Guston",
year = "2015",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781624103346",
booktitle = "AIAA SPACE 2015 Conference and Exposition",
publisher = "American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - The public informing upstream engineering

T2 - A participatory technology assessment of NASA’s asteroid initiative

AU - Pirtle, Zachary

AU - Kessler, Jason

AU - Mahoney, Erin

AU - Kaminski, Amy

AU - Tomblin, David

AU - Worthington, Rick

AU - Gano, Gretchen

AU - Farooque, Mahmud

AU - Sittenfeld, David

AU - Guston, David

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Participatory technology assessment (pTA) is a methodology that seeks to gain public perspective such that it can inform government decision-making. For engineering activities that are in the early stages of preliminary design, or in what Fisher et al. might call ‘upstream’ engineering, pTA can be particularly useful in informing technical decision-making. We will discuss an experiment in using pTA to inform upstream engineering. In partnership with NASA, the Expert and Citizen Assessment of Science and Technology (ECAST) network conducted a pTA-based forum on NASA’s Asteroid Initatiative and other possible missions that could follow from it (e.g., Mars). The goal of the forum was to assess citizens’ values and their preferences about potential detection, mitigation, and exploration-based technologies associated with NASA’s Asteroid Initiative. ECAST organized two citizen forums in Phoenix, Arizona, and Boston, Massachusetts, in November 2014, with a total of 183 citizens selected by ECAST to reflect to rough order the demographics of each city. The forums included sessions on planetary defense, NASA’s Asteroid Redirect Mission, and Mars exploration. This paper focuses on the Mars exploration session. Citizens were given background information about three potential Mars missions that NASA could carry out and then engaged in structured facilitated discussions about their preferences: 1) Crewed orbital mission to direct robots on the surface of Mars; 2) short exploratory crewed mission to Mars surface; and 3) establishing a permanent settlement on Mars. In this paper, we will assess values and perceptions the public had about different Mars exploration options. We will also present results on the public’s perception of mission planning needs for NASA. These results show a complex set of values that may be relevant for NASA managers examining planning to go to Mars.

AB - Participatory technology assessment (pTA) is a methodology that seeks to gain public perspective such that it can inform government decision-making. For engineering activities that are in the early stages of preliminary design, or in what Fisher et al. might call ‘upstream’ engineering, pTA can be particularly useful in informing technical decision-making. We will discuss an experiment in using pTA to inform upstream engineering. In partnership with NASA, the Expert and Citizen Assessment of Science and Technology (ECAST) network conducted a pTA-based forum on NASA’s Asteroid Initatiative and other possible missions that could follow from it (e.g., Mars). The goal of the forum was to assess citizens’ values and their preferences about potential detection, mitigation, and exploration-based technologies associated with NASA’s Asteroid Initiative. ECAST organized two citizen forums in Phoenix, Arizona, and Boston, Massachusetts, in November 2014, with a total of 183 citizens selected by ECAST to reflect to rough order the demographics of each city. The forums included sessions on planetary defense, NASA’s Asteroid Redirect Mission, and Mars exploration. This paper focuses on the Mars exploration session. Citizens were given background information about three potential Mars missions that NASA could carry out and then engaged in structured facilitated discussions about their preferences: 1) Crewed orbital mission to direct robots on the surface of Mars; 2) short exploratory crewed mission to Mars surface; and 3) establishing a permanent settlement on Mars. In this paper, we will assess values and perceptions the public had about different Mars exploration options. We will also present results on the public’s perception of mission planning needs for NASA. These results show a complex set of values that may be relevant for NASA managers examining planning to go to Mars.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960418443&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960418443&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84960418443

SN - 9781624103346

BT - AIAA SPACE 2015 Conference and Exposition

PB - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA

ER -