The "public" in "public peace process" and in "mini-publics

" A dialogue between democratic theory and peace studies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The recent attention of peace studies scholars to the role of the "public" parallels an increased interest of democratic theorists in the legitimacy of "mini-publics:" initiatives that bring small groups of citizens together to discuss policy issues. In fact, democratic activists and peace activists who seek to engage the public face similar theoretical and practical challenges. The purpose of this article is to contribute to an emerging dialogue between the disciplines of democratic theory and peace studies. Such a dialogue can be beneficial in at least two ways: it allows an exploration of the role of legitimacy in public peace processes and the burdens that legitimacy put on the institutional design of such processes, and it allows an exploration of more ambitious models of public participation in the peace process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)347-377
Number of pages31
JournalPeace and Conflict Studies
Volume17
Issue number2
StatePublished - Sep 2010

Fingerprint

peace process
peace
legitimacy
dialogue
small group
citizen
participation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Safety Research
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Cite this

@article{b28e58e30b754c448d8289f81116264d,
title = "The {"}public{"} in {"}public peace process{"} and in {"}mini-publics: {"} A dialogue between democratic theory and peace studies",
abstract = "The recent attention of peace studies scholars to the role of the {"}public{"} parallels an increased interest of democratic theorists in the legitimacy of {"}mini-publics:{"} initiatives that bring small groups of citizens together to discuss policy issues. In fact, democratic activists and peace activists who seek to engage the public face similar theoretical and practical challenges. The purpose of this article is to contribute to an emerging dialogue between the disciplines of democratic theory and peace studies. Such a dialogue can be beneficial in at least two ways: it allows an exploration of the role of legitimacy in public peace processes and the burdens that legitimacy put on the institutional design of such processes, and it allows an exploration of more ambitious models of public participation in the peace process.",
author = "Amit Ron",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "347--377",
journal = "Peace and Conflict Studies",
issn = "1082-7307",
publisher = "Network of Peace and Conflict Studies",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The "public" in "public peace process" and in "mini-publics

T2 - " A dialogue between democratic theory and peace studies

AU - Ron, Amit

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - The recent attention of peace studies scholars to the role of the "public" parallels an increased interest of democratic theorists in the legitimacy of "mini-publics:" initiatives that bring small groups of citizens together to discuss policy issues. In fact, democratic activists and peace activists who seek to engage the public face similar theoretical and practical challenges. The purpose of this article is to contribute to an emerging dialogue between the disciplines of democratic theory and peace studies. Such a dialogue can be beneficial in at least two ways: it allows an exploration of the role of legitimacy in public peace processes and the burdens that legitimacy put on the institutional design of such processes, and it allows an exploration of more ambitious models of public participation in the peace process.

AB - The recent attention of peace studies scholars to the role of the "public" parallels an increased interest of democratic theorists in the legitimacy of "mini-publics:" initiatives that bring small groups of citizens together to discuss policy issues. In fact, democratic activists and peace activists who seek to engage the public face similar theoretical and practical challenges. The purpose of this article is to contribute to an emerging dialogue between the disciplines of democratic theory and peace studies. Such a dialogue can be beneficial in at least two ways: it allows an exploration of the role of legitimacy in public peace processes and the burdens that legitimacy put on the institutional design of such processes, and it allows an exploration of more ambitious models of public participation in the peace process.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955038583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955038583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 347

EP - 377

JO - Peace and Conflict Studies

JF - Peace and Conflict Studies

SN - 1082-7307

IS - 2

ER -