TY - JOUR
T1 - The problems of weak sustainability and associated indicators
AU - Wilson, Maxwell C.
AU - Wu, Jianguo
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Directorate for Biological Sciences [1342754].
Funding Information:
MW was supported in part by a grant from the National Science Foundation, grant number #1342754 during the writing of this manuscript. The authors wish to thank Qing Zhang and Runbing Yu for the assistance in data collection for section 4.
PY - 2017/1/2
Y1 - 2017/1/2
N2 - Sustainability is a grand challenge of our time. While there is a universal recognition that sustainability includes social, economic, and environmental components, the relationship and interchangeability between these components has been debated, resulting in three distinct sustainability perspectives: weak, strong, and absurdly strong sustainability. However, despite this active debate, few have questioned which types of sustainability commonly utilized index forms actually measure. Here we provide such an analysis, focusing on the interplay between the mathematical forms of sustainability indices and the three sustainability perspectives. We show that the computational underpinning of a sustainability index defines what type of sustainability the index is capable of measuring, while also providing alternative forms. We then provide a brief example of how these different sustainability perspectives can radically alter measured sustainability. We end with a call for sustainability researchers to be conscious of the values underlying index formation, deliberate in index selection, and explicit in result presentation, so that the scientific and stakeholder communities are better informed of sustainability assessments.
AB - Sustainability is a grand challenge of our time. While there is a universal recognition that sustainability includes social, economic, and environmental components, the relationship and interchangeability between these components has been debated, resulting in three distinct sustainability perspectives: weak, strong, and absurdly strong sustainability. However, despite this active debate, few have questioned which types of sustainability commonly utilized index forms actually measure. Here we provide such an analysis, focusing on the interplay between the mathematical forms of sustainability indices and the three sustainability perspectives. We show that the computational underpinning of a sustainability index defines what type of sustainability the index is capable of measuring, while also providing alternative forms. We then provide a brief example of how these different sustainability perspectives can radically alter measured sustainability. We end with a call for sustainability researchers to be conscious of the values underlying index formation, deliberate in index selection, and explicit in result presentation, so that the scientific and stakeholder communities are better informed of sustainability assessments.
KW - Sustainability indicators
KW - strong sustainability
KW - weak sustainability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958035416&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958035416&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13504509.2015.1136360
DO - 10.1080/13504509.2015.1136360
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84958035416
SN - 1350-4509
VL - 24
SP - 44
EP - 51
JO - International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology
JF - International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology
IS - 1
ER -