The Precedence effect

Revisited

William Yost, David R. Soderquist

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The precedence effect, as investigated by Wallach et al. [Am. J. Psychol. 62,324-336 (1949)] was studied in three experiments. Experiment I was a replication of the original work of Wallach et al. Although the first click pair appears to dominate the perception of the position of the lateral image, the effect of the first click pair does not appear to “offset” or “cancel” the effect of the second click pair in terms of producing a lateral image at midline. The data are consistent with Zurek’s [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67,952-964 (1980)] proposal that the binaural system is less sensitive to the interaural temporal difference of the second click pair. Experiment II indicated that the effect of the first click pair on lateral judgments still dominates that of the second click pair when the images are judged to be off midline. In all of these studies, the variability of the data is quite high. Experiment III showed that the first click pair also led to a larger change in masked thresholds (masking-level differences, MLDs) than does the second click pair. These data reconfirm the use of two-click stimuli for demonstrations of the precedence effect and they describe some of the limitations of the procedure and the generalities of the effect.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1377-1383
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume76
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1984
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

masking
stimuli
proposals
thresholds
Experiment
Masking
Stimulus
Original Work
Generality
Replication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

The Precedence effect : Revisited. / Yost, William; Soderquist, David R.

In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 76, No. 5, 01.01.1984, p. 1377-1383.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yost, William ; Soderquist, David R. / The Precedence effect : Revisited. In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1984 ; Vol. 76, No. 5. pp. 1377-1383.
@article{e27ef4d0df724c7b8a0ad84dc86d52ee,
title = "The Precedence effect: Revisited",
abstract = "The precedence effect, as investigated by Wallach et al. [Am. J. Psychol. 62,324-336 (1949)] was studied in three experiments. Experiment I was a replication of the original work of Wallach et al. Although the first click pair appears to dominate the perception of the position of the lateral image, the effect of the first click pair does not appear to “offset” or “cancel” the effect of the second click pair in terms of producing a lateral image at midline. The data are consistent with Zurek’s [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67,952-964 (1980)] proposal that the binaural system is less sensitive to the interaural temporal difference of the second click pair. Experiment II indicated that the effect of the first click pair on lateral judgments still dominates that of the second click pair when the images are judged to be off midline. In all of these studies, the variability of the data is quite high. Experiment III showed that the first click pair also led to a larger change in masked thresholds (masking-level differences, MLDs) than does the second click pair. These data reconfirm the use of two-click stimuli for demonstrations of the precedence effect and they describe some of the limitations of the procedure and the generalities of the effect.",
author = "William Yost and Soderquist, {David R.}",
year = "1984",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1121/1.391454",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "1377--1383",
journal = "Journal of the Acoustical Society of America",
issn = "0001-4966",
publisher = "Acoustical Society of America",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Precedence effect

T2 - Revisited

AU - Yost, William

AU - Soderquist, David R.

PY - 1984/1/1

Y1 - 1984/1/1

N2 - The precedence effect, as investigated by Wallach et al. [Am. J. Psychol. 62,324-336 (1949)] was studied in three experiments. Experiment I was a replication of the original work of Wallach et al. Although the first click pair appears to dominate the perception of the position of the lateral image, the effect of the first click pair does not appear to “offset” or “cancel” the effect of the second click pair in terms of producing a lateral image at midline. The data are consistent with Zurek’s [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67,952-964 (1980)] proposal that the binaural system is less sensitive to the interaural temporal difference of the second click pair. Experiment II indicated that the effect of the first click pair on lateral judgments still dominates that of the second click pair when the images are judged to be off midline. In all of these studies, the variability of the data is quite high. Experiment III showed that the first click pair also led to a larger change in masked thresholds (masking-level differences, MLDs) than does the second click pair. These data reconfirm the use of two-click stimuli for demonstrations of the precedence effect and they describe some of the limitations of the procedure and the generalities of the effect.

AB - The precedence effect, as investigated by Wallach et al. [Am. J. Psychol. 62,324-336 (1949)] was studied in three experiments. Experiment I was a replication of the original work of Wallach et al. Although the first click pair appears to dominate the perception of the position of the lateral image, the effect of the first click pair does not appear to “offset” or “cancel” the effect of the second click pair in terms of producing a lateral image at midline. The data are consistent with Zurek’s [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67,952-964 (1980)] proposal that the binaural system is less sensitive to the interaural temporal difference of the second click pair. Experiment II indicated that the effect of the first click pair on lateral judgments still dominates that of the second click pair when the images are judged to be off midline. In all of these studies, the variability of the data is quite high. Experiment III showed that the first click pair also led to a larger change in masked thresholds (masking-level differences, MLDs) than does the second click pair. These data reconfirm the use of two-click stimuli for demonstrations of the precedence effect and they describe some of the limitations of the procedure and the generalities of the effect.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021526182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021526182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1121/1.391454

DO - 10.1121/1.391454

M3 - Article

VL - 76

SP - 1377

EP - 1383

JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

SN - 0001-4966

IS - 5

ER -