The Political Economy of Public Values: A Case for the Public Sphere and Progressive Opportunity

Barry Bozeman, Japera Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

During the years that have elapsed since the publication of Moore’s and Bozeman’s quite different theories of public value, a great deal of attention has been focused on the public value(s) topic. In this essay, we discuss the evolution of the respective approaches, but particular attention is given to the criteria Bozeman established as “public values failure criteria,” a set of ideas juxtaposed against and influenced by market failure criteria. We suggest two new criteria worth adding to the original Bozeman model. The first of these is related to Moore’s work on the “public sphere.” We offer a somewhat different definition of “public sphere,” one that seems compatible with public values failure criteria. The second criterion pertains to “progressive opportunity,” a criterion taking into account the injurious potential of social inequities. We show the two criteria are especially relevant to the concerns in contemporary political economy disputes and that the two desiderata reinforce one another.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)61-85
Number of pages25
JournalAmerican Review of Public Administration
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 3 2015

Fingerprint

political economy
Values
market failure
Public sphere
Political economy
Public value

Keywords

  • administrative theory
  • governance
  • public administration
  • public values

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Cite this

The Political Economy of Public Values : A Case for the Public Sphere and Progressive Opportunity. / Bozeman, Barry; Johnson, Japera.

In: American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 45, No. 1, 03.01.2015, p. 61-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f0f043a621ef4510ba78c534e1432b90,
title = "The Political Economy of Public Values: A Case for the Public Sphere and Progressive Opportunity",
abstract = "During the years that have elapsed since the publication of Moore’s and Bozeman’s quite different theories of public value, a great deal of attention has been focused on the public value(s) topic. In this essay, we discuss the evolution of the respective approaches, but particular attention is given to the criteria Bozeman established as “public values failure criteria,” a set of ideas juxtaposed against and influenced by market failure criteria. We suggest two new criteria worth adding to the original Bozeman model. The first of these is related to Moore’s work on the “public sphere.” We offer a somewhat different definition of “public sphere,” one that seems compatible with public values failure criteria. The second criterion pertains to “progressive opportunity,” a criterion taking into account the injurious potential of social inequities. We show the two criteria are especially relevant to the concerns in contemporary political economy disputes and that the two desiderata reinforce one another.",
keywords = "administrative theory, governance, public administration, public values",
author = "Barry Bozeman and Japera Johnson",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1177/0275074014532826",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "61--85",
journal = "American Review of Public Administration",
issn = "0275-0740",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Political Economy of Public Values

T2 - A Case for the Public Sphere and Progressive Opportunity

AU - Bozeman, Barry

AU - Johnson, Japera

PY - 2015/1/3

Y1 - 2015/1/3

N2 - During the years that have elapsed since the publication of Moore’s and Bozeman’s quite different theories of public value, a great deal of attention has been focused on the public value(s) topic. In this essay, we discuss the evolution of the respective approaches, but particular attention is given to the criteria Bozeman established as “public values failure criteria,” a set of ideas juxtaposed against and influenced by market failure criteria. We suggest two new criteria worth adding to the original Bozeman model. The first of these is related to Moore’s work on the “public sphere.” We offer a somewhat different definition of “public sphere,” one that seems compatible with public values failure criteria. The second criterion pertains to “progressive opportunity,” a criterion taking into account the injurious potential of social inequities. We show the two criteria are especially relevant to the concerns in contemporary political economy disputes and that the two desiderata reinforce one another.

AB - During the years that have elapsed since the publication of Moore’s and Bozeman’s quite different theories of public value, a great deal of attention has been focused on the public value(s) topic. In this essay, we discuss the evolution of the respective approaches, but particular attention is given to the criteria Bozeman established as “public values failure criteria,” a set of ideas juxtaposed against and influenced by market failure criteria. We suggest two new criteria worth adding to the original Bozeman model. The first of these is related to Moore’s work on the “public sphere.” We offer a somewhat different definition of “public sphere,” one that seems compatible with public values failure criteria. The second criterion pertains to “progressive opportunity,” a criterion taking into account the injurious potential of social inequities. We show the two criteria are especially relevant to the concerns in contemporary political economy disputes and that the two desiderata reinforce one another.

KW - administrative theory

KW - governance

KW - public administration

KW - public values

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84912122915&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84912122915&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0275074014532826

DO - 10.1177/0275074014532826

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84912122915

VL - 45

SP - 61

EP - 85

JO - American Review of Public Administration

JF - American Review of Public Administration

SN - 0275-0740

IS - 1

ER -