The political dilemmas of formative assessment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The literature base on using formative assessment for instructional and intervention decisions is formidable, but the history of the practice of formative assessment is spotty. Even with the pressures of high-stakes accountability, its definition is fuzzy, its adoption is inconsistent, and the prognosis for future use is questionable. A historical and organizational perspective explores plausible explanations for that inconsistency. These possible explanations include the standard literature in the research-to-practice gap and must also include the current policy environment surrounding educational accountability. A number of organizational and historical/cultural hypotheses suggest potential limits of structured formative assessment. From several perspectives, the practical question that may shape the future of special education is the identity of individuals at the school level who are responsible for coordinating the collection of formative-assessment data, for analysis, and for responses to the data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)325-337
Number of pages13
JournalExceptional Children
Volume76
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Social Responsibility
Special Education
History
Pressure
responsibility
Research
special education
history
school
Professional Practice Gaps
literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Education

Cite this

The political dilemmas of formative assessment. / Dorn, Sherman.

In: Exceptional Children, Vol. 76, No. 3, 01.01.2010, p. 325-337.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d2d7674524e1489d9920fe1e5843d793,
title = "The political dilemmas of formative assessment",
abstract = "The literature base on using formative assessment for instructional and intervention decisions is formidable, but the history of the practice of formative assessment is spotty. Even with the pressures of high-stakes accountability, its definition is fuzzy, its adoption is inconsistent, and the prognosis for future use is questionable. A historical and organizational perspective explores plausible explanations for that inconsistency. These possible explanations include the standard literature in the research-to-practice gap and must also include the current policy environment surrounding educational accountability. A number of organizational and historical/cultural hypotheses suggest potential limits of structured formative assessment. From several perspectives, the practical question that may shape the future of special education is the identity of individuals at the school level who are responsible for coordinating the collection of formative-assessment data, for analysis, and for responses to the data.",
author = "Sherman Dorn",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "325--337",
journal = "Exceptional Children",
issn = "0014-4029",
publisher = "Council for Exceptional Children",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The political dilemmas of formative assessment

AU - Dorn, Sherman

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - The literature base on using formative assessment for instructional and intervention decisions is formidable, but the history of the practice of formative assessment is spotty. Even with the pressures of high-stakes accountability, its definition is fuzzy, its adoption is inconsistent, and the prognosis for future use is questionable. A historical and organizational perspective explores plausible explanations for that inconsistency. These possible explanations include the standard literature in the research-to-practice gap and must also include the current policy environment surrounding educational accountability. A number of organizational and historical/cultural hypotheses suggest potential limits of structured formative assessment. From several perspectives, the practical question that may shape the future of special education is the identity of individuals at the school level who are responsible for coordinating the collection of formative-assessment data, for analysis, and for responses to the data.

AB - The literature base on using formative assessment for instructional and intervention decisions is formidable, but the history of the practice of formative assessment is spotty. Even with the pressures of high-stakes accountability, its definition is fuzzy, its adoption is inconsistent, and the prognosis for future use is questionable. A historical and organizational perspective explores plausible explanations for that inconsistency. These possible explanations include the standard literature in the research-to-practice gap and must also include the current policy environment surrounding educational accountability. A number of organizational and historical/cultural hypotheses suggest potential limits of structured formative assessment. From several perspectives, the practical question that may shape the future of special education is the identity of individuals at the school level who are responsible for coordinating the collection of formative-assessment data, for analysis, and for responses to the data.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84255163811&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84255163811&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84255163811

VL - 76

SP - 325

EP - 337

JO - Exceptional Children

JF - Exceptional Children

SN - 0014-4029

IS - 3

ER -