The peer review process in science education journals

Dale Baker

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this paper, I explore the peer review process in electronic and print science education journals. The topics I address include how to submit manuscripts, criteria for reviews, reviewer qualifications, blind reviews, the qualifications and role of editors and associate editors, time lines, the most common reasons why manuscripts are rejected, writing to the journal audience and, how to interpret letters from editors. I include recommendations for responding to reviewers' comments when revising manuscripts and how to show editors that appropriate changes have been made to a manuscript. I conclude with a discussion of how the review process is a self-regulating mechanism that shapes the field.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)171-180
Number of pages10
JournalResearch in Science Education
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Keywords

  • Blind reviews
  • Editor role
  • Manuscript submission
  • Peer review
  • Review criteria
  • Reviewer qualifications

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The peer review process in science education journals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this