Abstract

American dominance of conventional military capabilities has forced potential competitors to explore asymmetric responses. Some of these, such as cyber conflict capabilities, may appear primarily tactical, but taken together with emerging strategic doctrines such as Russian "new generation warfare" or Chinese "unrestricted warfare" and unpredictable and potent technological evolution, an arguably new form of warfare - "civilizational conflict" - is emerging. This does not mean that current strategic and operational doctrine and activities are obsolete, but it does mean that a new conceptual framework for conflict among cultures is required, within which such more traditional operations are developed and deployed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)60-74
Number of pages15
JournalBulletin of the Atomic Scientists
Volume71
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 15 2015

Fingerprint

warfare
doctrine
Military

Keywords

  • civil-military relationships
  • civilizational conflict
  • fourth generation warfare
  • ISIS
  • Islamic State
  • new generation warfare
  • unrestricted warfare

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

The paradox of dominance : The age of civilizational conflict. / Allenby, Braden.

In: Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 71, No. 2, 15.03.2015, p. 60-74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{989ad4f6fcc5474586c616ad003a634a,
title = "The paradox of dominance: The age of civilizational conflict",
abstract = "American dominance of conventional military capabilities has forced potential competitors to explore asymmetric responses. Some of these, such as cyber conflict capabilities, may appear primarily tactical, but taken together with emerging strategic doctrines such as Russian {"}new generation warfare{"} or Chinese {"}unrestricted warfare{"} and unpredictable and potent technological evolution, an arguably new form of warfare - {"}civilizational conflict{"} - is emerging. This does not mean that current strategic and operational doctrine and activities are obsolete, but it does mean that a new conceptual framework for conflict among cultures is required, within which such more traditional operations are developed and deployed.",
keywords = "civil-military relationships, civilizational conflict, fourth generation warfare, ISIS, Islamic State, new generation warfare, unrestricted warfare",
author = "Braden Allenby",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1177/0096340215571911",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
pages = "60--74",
journal = "Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists",
issn = "0096-3402",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The paradox of dominance

T2 - The age of civilizational conflict

AU - Allenby, Braden

PY - 2015/3/15

Y1 - 2015/3/15

N2 - American dominance of conventional military capabilities has forced potential competitors to explore asymmetric responses. Some of these, such as cyber conflict capabilities, may appear primarily tactical, but taken together with emerging strategic doctrines such as Russian "new generation warfare" or Chinese "unrestricted warfare" and unpredictable and potent technological evolution, an arguably new form of warfare - "civilizational conflict" - is emerging. This does not mean that current strategic and operational doctrine and activities are obsolete, but it does mean that a new conceptual framework for conflict among cultures is required, within which such more traditional operations are developed and deployed.

AB - American dominance of conventional military capabilities has forced potential competitors to explore asymmetric responses. Some of these, such as cyber conflict capabilities, may appear primarily tactical, but taken together with emerging strategic doctrines such as Russian "new generation warfare" or Chinese "unrestricted warfare" and unpredictable and potent technological evolution, an arguably new form of warfare - "civilizational conflict" - is emerging. This does not mean that current strategic and operational doctrine and activities are obsolete, but it does mean that a new conceptual framework for conflict among cultures is required, within which such more traditional operations are developed and deployed.

KW - civil-military relationships

KW - civilizational conflict

KW - fourth generation warfare

KW - ISIS

KW - Islamic State

KW - new generation warfare

KW - unrestricted warfare

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924914787&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924914787&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0096340215571911

DO - 10.1177/0096340215571911

M3 - Article

VL - 71

SP - 60

EP - 74

JO - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

JF - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

SN - 0096-3402

IS - 2

ER -