The Pace of Technologic Change

Implications for Digital Health Behavior Intervention Research

Kevin Patrick, Eric B. Hekler, Deborah Estrin, David C. Mohr, Heleen Riper, David Crane, Job Godino, William T. Riley

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper addresses the rapid pace of change in the technologies that support digital interventions; the complexity of the health problems they aim to address; and the adaptation of scientific methods to accommodate the volume, velocity, and variety of data and interventions possible from these technologies. Information, communication, and computing technologies are now part of every societal domain and support essentially every facet of human activity. Ubiquitous computing, a vision articulated fewer than 30 years ago, has now arrived. Simultaneously, there is a global crisis in health through the combination of lifestyle and age-related chronic disease and multiple comorbidities. Computationally intensive health behavior interventions may be one of the most powerful methods to reduce the consequences of this crisis, but new methods are needed for health research and practice, and evidence is needed to support their widespread use. The challenges are many, including a reluctance to abandon timeworn theories and models of health behavior—and health interventions more broadly—that emerged in an era of self-reported data; medical models of prevention, diagnosis, and treatment; and scientific methods grounded in sparse and expensive data. There are also many challenges inherent in demonstrating that newer approaches are, indeed, effective. Potential solutions may be found in leveraging methods of research that have been shown to be successful in other domains, particularly engineering. A more “agile science” may be needed that streamlines the methods through which elements of health interventions are shown to work or not, and to more rapidly deploy and iteratively improve those that do. There is much to do to advance the issues discussed in this paper, and the papers in this theme issue. It remains an open question whether interventions based in these new models and methods are, in fact, equally if not more efficacious as what is available currently. Economic analyses of these new approaches are needed because assumptions of net worth compared to other approaches are just that, assumptions. Human-centered design research is needed to ensure that users ultimately benefit. Finally, a translational research agenda will be needed, as the status quo will likely be resistant to change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)816-824
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume51
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

Fingerprint

Health Behavior
Research
Health
Technology
Translational Medical Research
Human Activities
Life Style
Comorbidity
Research Design
Communication
Economics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Patrick, K., Hekler, E. B., Estrin, D., Mohr, D. C., Riper, H., Crane, D., ... Riley, W. T. (2016). The Pace of Technologic Change: Implications for Digital Health Behavior Intervention Research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 51(5), 816-824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.001

The Pace of Technologic Change : Implications for Digital Health Behavior Intervention Research. / Patrick, Kevin; Hekler, Eric B.; Estrin, Deborah; Mohr, David C.; Riper, Heleen; Crane, David; Godino, Job; Riley, William T.

In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 51, No. 5, 01.11.2016, p. 816-824.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Patrick, K, Hekler, EB, Estrin, D, Mohr, DC, Riper, H, Crane, D, Godino, J & Riley, WT 2016, 'The Pace of Technologic Change: Implications for Digital Health Behavior Intervention Research', American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 816-824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.001
Patrick, Kevin ; Hekler, Eric B. ; Estrin, Deborah ; Mohr, David C. ; Riper, Heleen ; Crane, David ; Godino, Job ; Riley, William T. / The Pace of Technologic Change : Implications for Digital Health Behavior Intervention Research. In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2016 ; Vol. 51, No. 5. pp. 816-824.
@article{9199a2d2fbea4db3a9d876eef9e4748e,
title = "The Pace of Technologic Change: Implications for Digital Health Behavior Intervention Research",
abstract = "This paper addresses the rapid pace of change in the technologies that support digital interventions; the complexity of the health problems they aim to address; and the adaptation of scientific methods to accommodate the volume, velocity, and variety of data and interventions possible from these technologies. Information, communication, and computing technologies are now part of every societal domain and support essentially every facet of human activity. Ubiquitous computing, a vision articulated fewer than 30 years ago, has now arrived. Simultaneously, there is a global crisis in health through the combination of lifestyle and age-related chronic disease and multiple comorbidities. Computationally intensive health behavior interventions may be one of the most powerful methods to reduce the consequences of this crisis, but new methods are needed for health research and practice, and evidence is needed to support their widespread use. The challenges are many, including a reluctance to abandon timeworn theories and models of health behavior—and health interventions more broadly—that emerged in an era of self-reported data; medical models of prevention, diagnosis, and treatment; and scientific methods grounded in sparse and expensive data. There are also many challenges inherent in demonstrating that newer approaches are, indeed, effective. Potential solutions may be found in leveraging methods of research that have been shown to be successful in other domains, particularly engineering. A more “agile science” may be needed that streamlines the methods through which elements of health interventions are shown to work or not, and to more rapidly deploy and iteratively improve those that do. There is much to do to advance the issues discussed in this paper, and the papers in this theme issue. It remains an open question whether interventions based in these new models and methods are, in fact, equally if not more efficacious as what is available currently. Economic analyses of these new approaches are needed because assumptions of net worth compared to other approaches are just that, assumptions. Human-centered design research is needed to ensure that users ultimately benefit. Finally, a translational research agenda will be needed, as the status quo will likely be resistant to change.",
author = "Kevin Patrick and Hekler, {Eric B.} and Deborah Estrin and Mohr, {David C.} and Heleen Riper and David Crane and Job Godino and Riley, {William T.}",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "816--824",
journal = "American Journal of Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0749-3797",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Pace of Technologic Change

T2 - Implications for Digital Health Behavior Intervention Research

AU - Patrick, Kevin

AU - Hekler, Eric B.

AU - Estrin, Deborah

AU - Mohr, David C.

AU - Riper, Heleen

AU - Crane, David

AU - Godino, Job

AU - Riley, William T.

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - This paper addresses the rapid pace of change in the technologies that support digital interventions; the complexity of the health problems they aim to address; and the adaptation of scientific methods to accommodate the volume, velocity, and variety of data and interventions possible from these technologies. Information, communication, and computing technologies are now part of every societal domain and support essentially every facet of human activity. Ubiquitous computing, a vision articulated fewer than 30 years ago, has now arrived. Simultaneously, there is a global crisis in health through the combination of lifestyle and age-related chronic disease and multiple comorbidities. Computationally intensive health behavior interventions may be one of the most powerful methods to reduce the consequences of this crisis, but new methods are needed for health research and practice, and evidence is needed to support their widespread use. The challenges are many, including a reluctance to abandon timeworn theories and models of health behavior—and health interventions more broadly—that emerged in an era of self-reported data; medical models of prevention, diagnosis, and treatment; and scientific methods grounded in sparse and expensive data. There are also many challenges inherent in demonstrating that newer approaches are, indeed, effective. Potential solutions may be found in leveraging methods of research that have been shown to be successful in other domains, particularly engineering. A more “agile science” may be needed that streamlines the methods through which elements of health interventions are shown to work or not, and to more rapidly deploy and iteratively improve those that do. There is much to do to advance the issues discussed in this paper, and the papers in this theme issue. It remains an open question whether interventions based in these new models and methods are, in fact, equally if not more efficacious as what is available currently. Economic analyses of these new approaches are needed because assumptions of net worth compared to other approaches are just that, assumptions. Human-centered design research is needed to ensure that users ultimately benefit. Finally, a translational research agenda will be needed, as the status quo will likely be resistant to change.

AB - This paper addresses the rapid pace of change in the technologies that support digital interventions; the complexity of the health problems they aim to address; and the adaptation of scientific methods to accommodate the volume, velocity, and variety of data and interventions possible from these technologies. Information, communication, and computing technologies are now part of every societal domain and support essentially every facet of human activity. Ubiquitous computing, a vision articulated fewer than 30 years ago, has now arrived. Simultaneously, there is a global crisis in health through the combination of lifestyle and age-related chronic disease and multiple comorbidities. Computationally intensive health behavior interventions may be one of the most powerful methods to reduce the consequences of this crisis, but new methods are needed for health research and practice, and evidence is needed to support their widespread use. The challenges are many, including a reluctance to abandon timeworn theories and models of health behavior—and health interventions more broadly—that emerged in an era of self-reported data; medical models of prevention, diagnosis, and treatment; and scientific methods grounded in sparse and expensive data. There are also many challenges inherent in demonstrating that newer approaches are, indeed, effective. Potential solutions may be found in leveraging methods of research that have been shown to be successful in other domains, particularly engineering. A more “agile science” may be needed that streamlines the methods through which elements of health interventions are shown to work or not, and to more rapidly deploy and iteratively improve those that do. There is much to do to advance the issues discussed in this paper, and the papers in this theme issue. It remains an open question whether interventions based in these new models and methods are, in fact, equally if not more efficacious as what is available currently. Economic analyses of these new approaches are needed because assumptions of net worth compared to other approaches are just that, assumptions. Human-centered design research is needed to ensure that users ultimately benefit. Finally, a translational research agenda will be needed, as the status quo will likely be resistant to change.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994158331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994158331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.001

DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.001

M3 - Editorial

VL - 51

SP - 816

EP - 824

JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

SN - 0749-3797

IS - 5

ER -