The Osteological Paradox 20 Years Later: Past Perspectives, Future Directions

Sharon N. DeWitte, Christopher Stojanowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

79 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

More than 20 years ago, Wood et al. (Curr Anthropol 33:343–370, 1992) published “The Osteological Paradox: Problems of Inferring Prehistoric Health from Skeletal Samples,” in which they challenged bioarchaeologists to consider the effects of heterogeneous frailty and selective mortality on health inferences in past populations. Here, we review the paper’s impact on bioarchaeology and paleopathology, focusing on recent advancements in studies of ancient health. We find the paper is often cited but infrequently engaged in a meaningful way. Despite an initial decade of limited progress, numerous researchers are now addressing components of the Paradox in more informed ways. We identify four areas of fruitful research: (1) intrasite, contextual perspectives, (2) subadults, (3) associating stress markers with demographic phenomena, and (4) skeletal lesion-formation processes. Although often seen as a problematic assumption, understanding the sources of heterogeneous frailty within human populations is a worthy research question in and of itself, and one that clearly links past and present health research within a global framework.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)397-450
Number of pages54
JournalJournal of Archaeological Research
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 30 2015

Fingerprint

future perspective
health
mortality
Health
Paradox
present
Frailty

Keywords

  • Ancient health
  • Bioarchaeology
  • Demography
  • Morbidity
  • Mortality
  • Paleopathology
  • Sample bias

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Archaeology
  • Archaeology
  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

The Osteological Paradox 20 Years Later : Past Perspectives, Future Directions. / DeWitte, Sharon N.; Stojanowski, Christopher.

In: Journal of Archaeological Research, Vol. 23, No. 4, 30.12.2015, p. 397-450.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{36b6b242159f4fbca6a27ffc28ae51b8,
title = "The Osteological Paradox 20 Years Later: Past Perspectives, Future Directions",
abstract = "More than 20 years ago, Wood et al. (Curr Anthropol 33:343–370, 1992) published “The Osteological Paradox: Problems of Inferring Prehistoric Health from Skeletal Samples,” in which they challenged bioarchaeologists to consider the effects of heterogeneous frailty and selective mortality on health inferences in past populations. Here, we review the paper’s impact on bioarchaeology and paleopathology, focusing on recent advancements in studies of ancient health. We find the paper is often cited but infrequently engaged in a meaningful way. Despite an initial decade of limited progress, numerous researchers are now addressing components of the Paradox in more informed ways. We identify four areas of fruitful research: (1) intrasite, contextual perspectives, (2) subadults, (3) associating stress markers with demographic phenomena, and (4) skeletal lesion-formation processes. Although often seen as a problematic assumption, understanding the sources of heterogeneous frailty within human populations is a worthy research question in and of itself, and one that clearly links past and present health research within a global framework.",
keywords = "Ancient health, Bioarchaeology, Demography, Morbidity, Mortality, Paleopathology, Sample bias",
author = "DeWitte, {Sharon N.} and Christopher Stojanowski",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1007/s10814-015-9084-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "397--450",
journal = "Journal of Archaeological Research",
issn = "1059-0161",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Osteological Paradox 20 Years Later

T2 - Past Perspectives, Future Directions

AU - DeWitte, Sharon N.

AU - Stojanowski, Christopher

PY - 2015/12/30

Y1 - 2015/12/30

N2 - More than 20 years ago, Wood et al. (Curr Anthropol 33:343–370, 1992) published “The Osteological Paradox: Problems of Inferring Prehistoric Health from Skeletal Samples,” in which they challenged bioarchaeologists to consider the effects of heterogeneous frailty and selective mortality on health inferences in past populations. Here, we review the paper’s impact on bioarchaeology and paleopathology, focusing on recent advancements in studies of ancient health. We find the paper is often cited but infrequently engaged in a meaningful way. Despite an initial decade of limited progress, numerous researchers are now addressing components of the Paradox in more informed ways. We identify four areas of fruitful research: (1) intrasite, contextual perspectives, (2) subadults, (3) associating stress markers with demographic phenomena, and (4) skeletal lesion-formation processes. Although often seen as a problematic assumption, understanding the sources of heterogeneous frailty within human populations is a worthy research question in and of itself, and one that clearly links past and present health research within a global framework.

AB - More than 20 years ago, Wood et al. (Curr Anthropol 33:343–370, 1992) published “The Osteological Paradox: Problems of Inferring Prehistoric Health from Skeletal Samples,” in which they challenged bioarchaeologists to consider the effects of heterogeneous frailty and selective mortality on health inferences in past populations. Here, we review the paper’s impact on bioarchaeology and paleopathology, focusing on recent advancements in studies of ancient health. We find the paper is often cited but infrequently engaged in a meaningful way. Despite an initial decade of limited progress, numerous researchers are now addressing components of the Paradox in more informed ways. We identify four areas of fruitful research: (1) intrasite, contextual perspectives, (2) subadults, (3) associating stress markers with demographic phenomena, and (4) skeletal lesion-formation processes. Although often seen as a problematic assumption, understanding the sources of heterogeneous frailty within human populations is a worthy research question in and of itself, and one that clearly links past and present health research within a global framework.

KW - Ancient health

KW - Bioarchaeology

KW - Demography

KW - Morbidity

KW - Mortality

KW - Paleopathology

KW - Sample bias

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942833675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942833675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10814-015-9084-1

DO - 10.1007/s10814-015-9084-1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84942833675

VL - 23

SP - 397

EP - 450

JO - Journal of Archaeological Research

JF - Journal of Archaeological Research

SN - 1059-0161

IS - 4

ER -