The myth of partisan selective exposure: A portrait of the online political news audience

Jacob L. Nelson, James G. Webster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many assume that in a digital environment with a wide range of ideologically tinged news outlets, partisan selective exposure to like-minded speech is pervasive and a primary cause of political polarization. Yet, partisan selective exposure research tends to stem from experimental or self-reported data, which limits the applicability of their findings in a high-choice media environment. We explore observed online audience behavior data to present a portrait of the actual online political news audience. We find that this audience frequently navigates to news sites from Facebook, and that it congregates among a few popular, well-known political news sites. We also find that political news sites comprise ideologically diverse audiences, and that they share audiences with nearly all smaller, more ideologically extreme outlets. Our results call into question the strength of the so-called red/blue divide in actual web use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSocial Media and Society
Volume3
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

myth
news
Polarization
facebook
polarization
cause

Keywords

  • Audience behavior
  • Media choice
  • Network analysis
  • Partisan selective exposure
  • Social network sites

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • Communication
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

The myth of partisan selective exposure : A portrait of the online political news audience. / Nelson, Jacob L.; Webster, James G.

In: Social Media and Society, Vol. 3, No. 3, 01.01.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8c45cc7b7873480094bae4302761718c,
title = "The myth of partisan selective exposure: A portrait of the online political news audience",
abstract = "Many assume that in a digital environment with a wide range of ideologically tinged news outlets, partisan selective exposure to like-minded speech is pervasive and a primary cause of political polarization. Yet, partisan selective exposure research tends to stem from experimental or self-reported data, which limits the applicability of their findings in a high-choice media environment. We explore observed online audience behavior data to present a portrait of the actual online political news audience. We find that this audience frequently navigates to news sites from Facebook, and that it congregates among a few popular, well-known political news sites. We also find that political news sites comprise ideologically diverse audiences, and that they share audiences with nearly all smaller, more ideologically extreme outlets. Our results call into question the strength of the so-called red/blue divide in actual web use.",
keywords = "Audience behavior, Media choice, Network analysis, Partisan selective exposure, Social network sites",
author = "Nelson, {Jacob L.} and Webster, {James G.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/2056305117729314",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
journal = "Social Media and Society",
issn = "2056-3051",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The myth of partisan selective exposure

T2 - A portrait of the online political news audience

AU - Nelson, Jacob L.

AU - Webster, James G.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Many assume that in a digital environment with a wide range of ideologically tinged news outlets, partisan selective exposure to like-minded speech is pervasive and a primary cause of political polarization. Yet, partisan selective exposure research tends to stem from experimental or self-reported data, which limits the applicability of their findings in a high-choice media environment. We explore observed online audience behavior data to present a portrait of the actual online political news audience. We find that this audience frequently navigates to news sites from Facebook, and that it congregates among a few popular, well-known political news sites. We also find that political news sites comprise ideologically diverse audiences, and that they share audiences with nearly all smaller, more ideologically extreme outlets. Our results call into question the strength of the so-called red/blue divide in actual web use.

AB - Many assume that in a digital environment with a wide range of ideologically tinged news outlets, partisan selective exposure to like-minded speech is pervasive and a primary cause of political polarization. Yet, partisan selective exposure research tends to stem from experimental or self-reported data, which limits the applicability of their findings in a high-choice media environment. We explore observed online audience behavior data to present a portrait of the actual online political news audience. We find that this audience frequently navigates to news sites from Facebook, and that it congregates among a few popular, well-known political news sites. We also find that political news sites comprise ideologically diverse audiences, and that they share audiences with nearly all smaller, more ideologically extreme outlets. Our results call into question the strength of the so-called red/blue divide in actual web use.

KW - Audience behavior

KW - Media choice

KW - Network analysis

KW - Partisan selective exposure

KW - Social network sites

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038103437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038103437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2056305117729314

DO - 10.1177/2056305117729314

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85038103437

VL - 3

JO - Social Media and Society

JF - Social Media and Society

SN - 2056-3051

IS - 3

ER -