The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act: Planning for and response to bioterrorism and naturally occurring infectious diseases

Lawrence O. Gostin, Jason W. Sapsin, Stephen P. Teret, Scott Burris, Julie Samia Mair, James Hodge, Jon S. Vernick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

129 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Center for Law and the Public's Health at Georgetown and Johns Hopkins Universities drafted the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (MSEHPA or Model Act) at the request of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Model Act provides state actors with the powers they need to detect and contain bioterrorism or a naturally occurring disease outbreak. Legislative bills based on the MSEHPA have been introduced in 34 states. Problems of obsolescence, inconsistency, and inadequacy may render current state laws ineffective or even counterproductive. State laws often date back to the early 20th century and have been built up in layers over the years. They frequently predate the vast changes in the public health sciences and constitutional law. The Model Act is structured to reflect 5 basic public health functions to be facilitated by law: (1) preparedness, comprehensive planning for a public health emergency; (2) surveillance, measures to detect and track public health emergencies; (3) management of property, ensuring adequate availability of vaccines, pharmaceuticals, and hospitals, as well as providing power to abate hazards to the public's health; (4) protection of persons, powers to compel vaccination, testing, treatment, isolation, and quarantine when clearly necessary; and (5) communication, providing clear and authoritative information to the public. The Model Act also contains a modernized, extensive set of principles and requirements to safeguard personal rights. Law can be a tool to improve public health preparedness. A constitutional democracy must balance the common good with respect for personal dignity, toleration of groups, and adherence to principles of justice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)622-628
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Medical Association
Volume288
Issue number5
StatePublished - Aug 7 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Bioterrorism
Communicable Diseases
Emergencies
Public Health
Health
Social Justice
Democracy
Quarantine
Jurisprudence
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)
Prednisolone
Disease Outbreaks
Vaccination
Vaccines
Pharmaceutical Preparations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act : Planning for and response to bioterrorism and naturally occurring infectious diseases. / Gostin, Lawrence O.; Sapsin, Jason W.; Teret, Stephen P.; Burris, Scott; Mair, Julie Samia; Hodge, James; Vernick, Jon S.

In: Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 288, No. 5, 07.08.2002, p. 622-628.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gostin, Lawrence O. ; Sapsin, Jason W. ; Teret, Stephen P. ; Burris, Scott ; Mair, Julie Samia ; Hodge, James ; Vernick, Jon S. / The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act : Planning for and response to bioterrorism and naturally occurring infectious diseases. In: Journal of the American Medical Association. 2002 ; Vol. 288, No. 5. pp. 622-628.
@article{46621b5960d348c795e8e3ac0670cd91,
title = "The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act: Planning for and response to bioterrorism and naturally occurring infectious diseases",
abstract = "The Center for Law and the Public's Health at Georgetown and Johns Hopkins Universities drafted the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (MSEHPA or Model Act) at the request of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Model Act provides state actors with the powers they need to detect and contain bioterrorism or a naturally occurring disease outbreak. Legislative bills based on the MSEHPA have been introduced in 34 states. Problems of obsolescence, inconsistency, and inadequacy may render current state laws ineffective or even counterproductive. State laws often date back to the early 20th century and have been built up in layers over the years. They frequently predate the vast changes in the public health sciences and constitutional law. The Model Act is structured to reflect 5 basic public health functions to be facilitated by law: (1) preparedness, comprehensive planning for a public health emergency; (2) surveillance, measures to detect and track public health emergencies; (3) management of property, ensuring adequate availability of vaccines, pharmaceuticals, and hospitals, as well as providing power to abate hazards to the public's health; (4) protection of persons, powers to compel vaccination, testing, treatment, isolation, and quarantine when clearly necessary; and (5) communication, providing clear and authoritative information to the public. The Model Act also contains a modernized, extensive set of principles and requirements to safeguard personal rights. Law can be a tool to improve public health preparedness. A constitutional democracy must balance the common good with respect for personal dignity, toleration of groups, and adherence to principles of justice.",
author = "Gostin, {Lawrence O.} and Sapsin, {Jason W.} and Teret, {Stephen P.} and Scott Burris and Mair, {Julie Samia} and James Hodge and Vernick, {Jon S.}",
year = "2002",
month = "8",
day = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "288",
pages = "622--628",
journal = "JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association",
issn = "0002-9955",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act

T2 - Planning for and response to bioterrorism and naturally occurring infectious diseases

AU - Gostin, Lawrence O.

AU - Sapsin, Jason W.

AU - Teret, Stephen P.

AU - Burris, Scott

AU - Mair, Julie Samia

AU - Hodge, James

AU - Vernick, Jon S.

PY - 2002/8/7

Y1 - 2002/8/7

N2 - The Center for Law and the Public's Health at Georgetown and Johns Hopkins Universities drafted the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (MSEHPA or Model Act) at the request of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Model Act provides state actors with the powers they need to detect and contain bioterrorism or a naturally occurring disease outbreak. Legislative bills based on the MSEHPA have been introduced in 34 states. Problems of obsolescence, inconsistency, and inadequacy may render current state laws ineffective or even counterproductive. State laws often date back to the early 20th century and have been built up in layers over the years. They frequently predate the vast changes in the public health sciences and constitutional law. The Model Act is structured to reflect 5 basic public health functions to be facilitated by law: (1) preparedness, comprehensive planning for a public health emergency; (2) surveillance, measures to detect and track public health emergencies; (3) management of property, ensuring adequate availability of vaccines, pharmaceuticals, and hospitals, as well as providing power to abate hazards to the public's health; (4) protection of persons, powers to compel vaccination, testing, treatment, isolation, and quarantine when clearly necessary; and (5) communication, providing clear and authoritative information to the public. The Model Act also contains a modernized, extensive set of principles and requirements to safeguard personal rights. Law can be a tool to improve public health preparedness. A constitutional democracy must balance the common good with respect for personal dignity, toleration of groups, and adherence to principles of justice.

AB - The Center for Law and the Public's Health at Georgetown and Johns Hopkins Universities drafted the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (MSEHPA or Model Act) at the request of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Model Act provides state actors with the powers they need to detect and contain bioterrorism or a naturally occurring disease outbreak. Legislative bills based on the MSEHPA have been introduced in 34 states. Problems of obsolescence, inconsistency, and inadequacy may render current state laws ineffective or even counterproductive. State laws often date back to the early 20th century and have been built up in layers over the years. They frequently predate the vast changes in the public health sciences and constitutional law. The Model Act is structured to reflect 5 basic public health functions to be facilitated by law: (1) preparedness, comprehensive planning for a public health emergency; (2) surveillance, measures to detect and track public health emergencies; (3) management of property, ensuring adequate availability of vaccines, pharmaceuticals, and hospitals, as well as providing power to abate hazards to the public's health; (4) protection of persons, powers to compel vaccination, testing, treatment, isolation, and quarantine when clearly necessary; and (5) communication, providing clear and authoritative information to the public. The Model Act also contains a modernized, extensive set of principles and requirements to safeguard personal rights. Law can be a tool to improve public health preparedness. A constitutional democracy must balance the common good with respect for personal dignity, toleration of groups, and adherence to principles of justice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037036756&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037036756&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12150674

AN - SCOPUS:0037036756

VL - 288

SP - 622

EP - 628

JO - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

JF - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

SN - 0002-9955

IS - 5

ER -