The mechanisms of working memory capacity

Primary memory, secondary memory, and attention control

Zach Shipstead, Dakota R B Lindsey, Robyn L. Marshall, Randall W. Engle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

131 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Working memory capacity is traditionally treated as a unitary construct that can be explained using one cognitive mechanism (e.g., storage, attention control). Several recent studies have, however, demonstrated that multiple mechanisms are needed to explain individual differences in working memory capacity. The present study focuses on three such mechanisms: Maintenance/disengagement in primary memory, retrieval from secondary memory, and attention control. Structural equation modeling reveals that each of these mechanisms is important to explaining individual differences in working memory capacity. Further analyses reveal that the degree to which these mechanisms are apparent may be driven by the type of task used to operationalize working memory capacity. Specifically, complex span (processing and storage) and visual arrays (change detection) performance is strongly related to a person's attention control, while running memory span (memory for last n items on a list) performance has a relationship to primary memory that is apparent above-and-beyond other working memory tasks. Finally, regardless of the working memory task that is used, it is found that primary and secondary memory fully explain the relationship of working memory capacity to general fluid intelligence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)116-141
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Memory and Language
Volume72
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2014

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
Data storage equipment
Individuality
Working Memory Capacity
Intelligence
Maintenance
disengagement
performance
intelligence
Working Memory
Individual Differences

Keywords

  • Attention
  • General fluid intelligence
  • Maintenance
  • Retrieval
  • Working memory capacity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

The mechanisms of working memory capacity : Primary memory, secondary memory, and attention control. / Shipstead, Zach; Lindsey, Dakota R B; Marshall, Robyn L.; Engle, Randall W.

In: Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 72, No. 1, 04.2014, p. 116-141.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shipstead, Zach ; Lindsey, Dakota R B ; Marshall, Robyn L. ; Engle, Randall W. / The mechanisms of working memory capacity : Primary memory, secondary memory, and attention control. In: Journal of Memory and Language. 2014 ; Vol. 72, No. 1. pp. 116-141.
@article{c26a77f58b984763b4c340435222bc47,
title = "The mechanisms of working memory capacity: Primary memory, secondary memory, and attention control",
abstract = "Working memory capacity is traditionally treated as a unitary construct that can be explained using one cognitive mechanism (e.g., storage, attention control). Several recent studies have, however, demonstrated that multiple mechanisms are needed to explain individual differences in working memory capacity. The present study focuses on three such mechanisms: Maintenance/disengagement in primary memory, retrieval from secondary memory, and attention control. Structural equation modeling reveals that each of these mechanisms is important to explaining individual differences in working memory capacity. Further analyses reveal that the degree to which these mechanisms are apparent may be driven by the type of task used to operationalize working memory capacity. Specifically, complex span (processing and storage) and visual arrays (change detection) performance is strongly related to a person's attention control, while running memory span (memory for last n items on a list) performance has a relationship to primary memory that is apparent above-and-beyond other working memory tasks. Finally, regardless of the working memory task that is used, it is found that primary and secondary memory fully explain the relationship of working memory capacity to general fluid intelligence.",
keywords = "Attention, General fluid intelligence, Maintenance, Retrieval, Working memory capacity",
author = "Zach Shipstead and Lindsey, {Dakota R B} and Marshall, {Robyn L.} and Engle, {Randall W.}",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.jml.2014.01.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
pages = "116--141",
journal = "Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia",
issn = "1888-4415",
publisher = "Ediciones Doyma, S.L.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The mechanisms of working memory capacity

T2 - Primary memory, secondary memory, and attention control

AU - Shipstead, Zach

AU - Lindsey, Dakota R B

AU - Marshall, Robyn L.

AU - Engle, Randall W.

PY - 2014/4

Y1 - 2014/4

N2 - Working memory capacity is traditionally treated as a unitary construct that can be explained using one cognitive mechanism (e.g., storage, attention control). Several recent studies have, however, demonstrated that multiple mechanisms are needed to explain individual differences in working memory capacity. The present study focuses on three such mechanisms: Maintenance/disengagement in primary memory, retrieval from secondary memory, and attention control. Structural equation modeling reveals that each of these mechanisms is important to explaining individual differences in working memory capacity. Further analyses reveal that the degree to which these mechanisms are apparent may be driven by the type of task used to operationalize working memory capacity. Specifically, complex span (processing and storage) and visual arrays (change detection) performance is strongly related to a person's attention control, while running memory span (memory for last n items on a list) performance has a relationship to primary memory that is apparent above-and-beyond other working memory tasks. Finally, regardless of the working memory task that is used, it is found that primary and secondary memory fully explain the relationship of working memory capacity to general fluid intelligence.

AB - Working memory capacity is traditionally treated as a unitary construct that can be explained using one cognitive mechanism (e.g., storage, attention control). Several recent studies have, however, demonstrated that multiple mechanisms are needed to explain individual differences in working memory capacity. The present study focuses on three such mechanisms: Maintenance/disengagement in primary memory, retrieval from secondary memory, and attention control. Structural equation modeling reveals that each of these mechanisms is important to explaining individual differences in working memory capacity. Further analyses reveal that the degree to which these mechanisms are apparent may be driven by the type of task used to operationalize working memory capacity. Specifically, complex span (processing and storage) and visual arrays (change detection) performance is strongly related to a person's attention control, while running memory span (memory for last n items on a list) performance has a relationship to primary memory that is apparent above-and-beyond other working memory tasks. Finally, regardless of the working memory task that is used, it is found that primary and secondary memory fully explain the relationship of working memory capacity to general fluid intelligence.

KW - Attention

KW - General fluid intelligence

KW - Maintenance

KW - Retrieval

KW - Working memory capacity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894372106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894372106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jml.2014.01.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jml.2014.01.004

M3 - Article

VL - 72

SP - 116

EP - 141

JO - Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia

JF - Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia

SN - 1888-4415

IS - 1

ER -