The making of homophilic networks in international research collaborations: A global perspective from Chilean and Korean engineering

Sergio Celis, Jeongeun Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As globalization has expedited mobility of faculty across nations, faculty hiring is taking place at an international level. Institutions and governments often perceive hiring faculty who were trained in different countries as a strategy for reaching the status of world-class universities. The major assumption behind this hiring strategy is that faculty who are educated in prestigious universities in foreign countries will bring cutting edge knowledge and networks that will lead to future research collaborations. Yet, a dearth of research empirically investigated the assumption that institutions that train future foreign faculty and those that hire faculty with foreign degrees will have greater presence in the international networks of research collaboration. Filling this hole, this study examines this assumption from an international perspective, using the case of industrial engineering departments at selective research universities in Chile and Korea. Based on the unique data that document faculty hiring (degree attainment institutions) and research collaboration (co-authorship), and institutional prestige (global ranking positions), we analyzed the relationship between faculty hiring network and research collaboration network, as well as their association with institutional prestige. The results provide strong evidence of the positive relationships between doctoral training and future research collaboration, and the strong presence of institutions with global prestige. These relationships result in homophilic networks that suggest a concern about a reduced diversity in theoretical perspective and research methods within the disciplinary field.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)573-582
Number of pages10
JournalResearch Policy
Volume47
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

Industrial engineering
Research collaboration
International research
Hiring
Prestige
University research
Government
International networks
Korea
Research methods
Chile
Globalization
Ranking
Train
Collaboration networks
Co-authorship

Keywords

  • Faculty hiring
  • Institutional prestige
  • International collaboration
  • Network analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

The making of homophilic networks in international research collaborations : A global perspective from Chilean and Korean engineering. / Celis, Sergio; Kim, Jeongeun.

In: Research Policy, Vol. 47, No. 3, 01.04.2018, p. 573-582.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9769b4d900744567b41bdaf201dd2780,
title = "The making of homophilic networks in international research collaborations: A global perspective from Chilean and Korean engineering",
abstract = "As globalization has expedited mobility of faculty across nations, faculty hiring is taking place at an international level. Institutions and governments often perceive hiring faculty who were trained in different countries as a strategy for reaching the status of world-class universities. The major assumption behind this hiring strategy is that faculty who are educated in prestigious universities in foreign countries will bring cutting edge knowledge and networks that will lead to future research collaborations. Yet, a dearth of research empirically investigated the assumption that institutions that train future foreign faculty and those that hire faculty with foreign degrees will have greater presence in the international networks of research collaboration. Filling this hole, this study examines this assumption from an international perspective, using the case of industrial engineering departments at selective research universities in Chile and Korea. Based on the unique data that document faculty hiring (degree attainment institutions) and research collaboration (co-authorship), and institutional prestige (global ranking positions), we analyzed the relationship between faculty hiring network and research collaboration network, as well as their association with institutional prestige. The results provide strong evidence of the positive relationships between doctoral training and future research collaboration, and the strong presence of institutions with global prestige. These relationships result in homophilic networks that suggest a concern about a reduced diversity in theoretical perspective and research methods within the disciplinary field.",
keywords = "Faculty hiring, Institutional prestige, International collaboration, Network analysis",
author = "Sergio Celis and Jeongeun Kim",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "573--582",
journal = "Research Policy",
issn = "0048-7333",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The making of homophilic networks in international research collaborations

T2 - A global perspective from Chilean and Korean engineering

AU - Celis, Sergio

AU - Kim, Jeongeun

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - As globalization has expedited mobility of faculty across nations, faculty hiring is taking place at an international level. Institutions and governments often perceive hiring faculty who were trained in different countries as a strategy for reaching the status of world-class universities. The major assumption behind this hiring strategy is that faculty who are educated in prestigious universities in foreign countries will bring cutting edge knowledge and networks that will lead to future research collaborations. Yet, a dearth of research empirically investigated the assumption that institutions that train future foreign faculty and those that hire faculty with foreign degrees will have greater presence in the international networks of research collaboration. Filling this hole, this study examines this assumption from an international perspective, using the case of industrial engineering departments at selective research universities in Chile and Korea. Based on the unique data that document faculty hiring (degree attainment institutions) and research collaboration (co-authorship), and institutional prestige (global ranking positions), we analyzed the relationship between faculty hiring network and research collaboration network, as well as their association with institutional prestige. The results provide strong evidence of the positive relationships between doctoral training and future research collaboration, and the strong presence of institutions with global prestige. These relationships result in homophilic networks that suggest a concern about a reduced diversity in theoretical perspective and research methods within the disciplinary field.

AB - As globalization has expedited mobility of faculty across nations, faculty hiring is taking place at an international level. Institutions and governments often perceive hiring faculty who were trained in different countries as a strategy for reaching the status of world-class universities. The major assumption behind this hiring strategy is that faculty who are educated in prestigious universities in foreign countries will bring cutting edge knowledge and networks that will lead to future research collaborations. Yet, a dearth of research empirically investigated the assumption that institutions that train future foreign faculty and those that hire faculty with foreign degrees will have greater presence in the international networks of research collaboration. Filling this hole, this study examines this assumption from an international perspective, using the case of industrial engineering departments at selective research universities in Chile and Korea. Based on the unique data that document faculty hiring (degree attainment institutions) and research collaboration (co-authorship), and institutional prestige (global ranking positions), we analyzed the relationship between faculty hiring network and research collaboration network, as well as their association with institutional prestige. The results provide strong evidence of the positive relationships between doctoral training and future research collaboration, and the strong presence of institutions with global prestige. These relationships result in homophilic networks that suggest a concern about a reduced diversity in theoretical perspective and research methods within the disciplinary field.

KW - Faculty hiring

KW - Institutional prestige

KW - International collaboration

KW - Network analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042087808&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042087808&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.001

DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85042087808

VL - 47

SP - 573

EP - 582

JO - Research Policy

JF - Research Policy

SN - 0048-7333

IS - 3

ER -