The "lunching" effect

Pigeons track motion towards food more than motion away from it

Felipe Cabrera, Federico Sanabria, David Shelley, Peter R. Killeen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Four experiments measured pigeons' pecking at a small touch-screen image (the CS) that moved towards or away from a source of food (the US). The image's effectiveness as a CS was dependent on its motion, direction, and distance relative to the US. Pecking to the CS increased with proximity to the US when the CS moved towards the US (Experiment 1). This held true even when a departing CS signalled a US of greater magnitude (Experiment 2). Response rates to stationary stimuli were greater the closer they were to the hopper; but rate was less than when the same spot was part of a motion towards food, and greater than when it was part of a motion away (Experiment 3). The rate of responding in all three cases (motion towards, stationary, motion away) decreased exponentially with distance from the hopper. The distance and motion effects observed under these Pavlovian contingencies were different when pecking to the spot was required for reinforcement (Experiment 4).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)229-235
Number of pages7
JournalBehavioural Processes
Volume82
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2009

Fingerprint

pecking
Columbidae
pigeons
Food

Keywords

  • Causal learning
  • Classical conditioning
  • Motion
  • Pigeons
  • Spatial contiguity
  • Touch-screen

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

The "lunching" effect : Pigeons track motion towards food more than motion away from it. / Cabrera, Felipe; Sanabria, Federico; Shelley, David; Killeen, Peter R.

In: Behavioural Processes, Vol. 82, No. 3, 11.2009, p. 229-235.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cabrera, Felipe ; Sanabria, Federico ; Shelley, David ; Killeen, Peter R. / The "lunching" effect : Pigeons track motion towards food more than motion away from it. In: Behavioural Processes. 2009 ; Vol. 82, No. 3. pp. 229-235.
@article{083d355509ae4d0cbb9a7d5feced3c03,
title = "The {"}lunching{"} effect: Pigeons track motion towards food more than motion away from it",
abstract = "Four experiments measured pigeons' pecking at a small touch-screen image (the CS) that moved towards or away from a source of food (the US). The image's effectiveness as a CS was dependent on its motion, direction, and distance relative to the US. Pecking to the CS increased with proximity to the US when the CS moved towards the US (Experiment 1). This held true even when a departing CS signalled a US of greater magnitude (Experiment 2). Response rates to stationary stimuli were greater the closer they were to the hopper; but rate was less than when the same spot was part of a motion towards food, and greater than when it was part of a motion away (Experiment 3). The rate of responding in all three cases (motion towards, stationary, motion away) decreased exponentially with distance from the hopper. The distance and motion effects observed under these Pavlovian contingencies were different when pecking to the spot was required for reinforcement (Experiment 4).",
keywords = "Causal learning, Classical conditioning, Motion, Pigeons, Spatial contiguity, Touch-screen",
author = "Felipe Cabrera and Federico Sanabria and David Shelley and Killeen, {Peter R.}",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.beproc.2009.06.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "229--235",
journal = "Behavioural Processes",
issn = "0376-6357",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The "lunching" effect

T2 - Pigeons track motion towards food more than motion away from it

AU - Cabrera, Felipe

AU - Sanabria, Federico

AU - Shelley, David

AU - Killeen, Peter R.

PY - 2009/11

Y1 - 2009/11

N2 - Four experiments measured pigeons' pecking at a small touch-screen image (the CS) that moved towards or away from a source of food (the US). The image's effectiveness as a CS was dependent on its motion, direction, and distance relative to the US. Pecking to the CS increased with proximity to the US when the CS moved towards the US (Experiment 1). This held true even when a departing CS signalled a US of greater magnitude (Experiment 2). Response rates to stationary stimuli were greater the closer they were to the hopper; but rate was less than when the same spot was part of a motion towards food, and greater than when it was part of a motion away (Experiment 3). The rate of responding in all three cases (motion towards, stationary, motion away) decreased exponentially with distance from the hopper. The distance and motion effects observed under these Pavlovian contingencies were different when pecking to the spot was required for reinforcement (Experiment 4).

AB - Four experiments measured pigeons' pecking at a small touch-screen image (the CS) that moved towards or away from a source of food (the US). The image's effectiveness as a CS was dependent on its motion, direction, and distance relative to the US. Pecking to the CS increased with proximity to the US when the CS moved towards the US (Experiment 1). This held true even when a departing CS signalled a US of greater magnitude (Experiment 2). Response rates to stationary stimuli were greater the closer they were to the hopper; but rate was less than when the same spot was part of a motion towards food, and greater than when it was part of a motion away (Experiment 3). The rate of responding in all three cases (motion towards, stationary, motion away) decreased exponentially with distance from the hopper. The distance and motion effects observed under these Pavlovian contingencies were different when pecking to the spot was required for reinforcement (Experiment 4).

KW - Causal learning

KW - Classical conditioning

KW - Motion

KW - Pigeons

KW - Spatial contiguity

KW - Touch-screen

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350093750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350093750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.06.010

DO - 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.06.010

M3 - Article

VL - 82

SP - 229

EP - 235

JO - Behavioural Processes

JF - Behavioural Processes

SN - 0376-6357

IS - 3

ER -