Abstract
Recently enacted rape shield laws, which restrict the introduction of evidence of the complainant's prior sexual conduct, have engendered considerable controversy. This paper examines the responses of judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys in six major urban jurisdictions to a set of hypothetical cases in which evidence of the victim's past sexual conduct is at issue. The different kinds of sexual history evidence evoke different responses from officials, and the specific provisions of the six rape shield statutes also affect officials' judgments.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 137-161 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Criminology |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1991 |
| Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
- Law
Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of '“THE LAW'S THE LAW, BUT FAIR IS FAIR: ” RAPE SHIELD LAWS AND OFFICIALS' ASSESSMENTS OF SEXUAL HISTORY EVIDENCE'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Cite this
Spohn, C., & HORNEY, JULIE. (1991). “THE LAW'S THE LAW, BUT FAIR IS FAIR: ” RAPE SHIELD LAWS AND OFFICIALS' ASSESSMENTS OF SEXUAL HISTORY EVIDENCE. Criminology, 29(1), 137-161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1991.tb01062.x