“THE LAW'S THE LAW, BUT FAIR IS FAIR: ” RAPE SHIELD LAWS AND OFFICIALS' ASSESSMENTS OF SEXUAL HISTORY EVIDENCE

Cassia Spohn, JULIE HORNEY

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recently enacted rape shield laws, which restrict the introduction of evidence of the complainant's prior sexual conduct, have engendered considerable controversy. This paper examines the responses of judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys in six major urban jurisdictions to a set of hypothetical cases in which evidence of the victim's past sexual conduct is at issue. The different kinds of sexual history evidence evoke different responses from officials, and the specific provisions of the six rape shield statutes also affect officials' judgments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)137-161
Number of pages25
JournalCriminology
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Lawyers
rape
Law
defense attorney
evidence
statute
jurisdiction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Cite this

“THE LAW'S THE LAW, BUT FAIR IS FAIR : ” RAPE SHIELD LAWS AND OFFICIALS' ASSESSMENTS OF SEXUAL HISTORY EVIDENCE. / Spohn, Cassia; HORNEY, JULIE.

In: Criminology, Vol. 29, No. 1, 1991, p. 137-161.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{389fac6332494f1baa6f70bc8481140c,
title = "“THE LAW'S THE LAW, BUT FAIR IS FAIR: ” RAPE SHIELD LAWS AND OFFICIALS' ASSESSMENTS OF SEXUAL HISTORY EVIDENCE",
abstract = "Recently enacted rape shield laws, which restrict the introduction of evidence of the complainant's prior sexual conduct, have engendered considerable controversy. This paper examines the responses of judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys in six major urban jurisdictions to a set of hypothetical cases in which evidence of the victim's past sexual conduct is at issue. The different kinds of sexual history evidence evoke different responses from officials, and the specific provisions of the six rape shield statutes also affect officials' judgments.",
author = "Cassia Spohn and JULIE HORNEY",
year = "1991",
doi = "10.1111/j.1745-9125.1991.tb01062.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "137--161",
journal = "Criminology",
issn = "0011-1384",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - “THE LAW'S THE LAW, BUT FAIR IS FAIR

T2 - ” RAPE SHIELD LAWS AND OFFICIALS' ASSESSMENTS OF SEXUAL HISTORY EVIDENCE

AU - Spohn, Cassia

AU - HORNEY, JULIE

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - Recently enacted rape shield laws, which restrict the introduction of evidence of the complainant's prior sexual conduct, have engendered considerable controversy. This paper examines the responses of judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys in six major urban jurisdictions to a set of hypothetical cases in which evidence of the victim's past sexual conduct is at issue. The different kinds of sexual history evidence evoke different responses from officials, and the specific provisions of the six rape shield statutes also affect officials' judgments.

AB - Recently enacted rape shield laws, which restrict the introduction of evidence of the complainant's prior sexual conduct, have engendered considerable controversy. This paper examines the responses of judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys in six major urban jurisdictions to a set of hypothetical cases in which evidence of the victim's past sexual conduct is at issue. The different kinds of sexual history evidence evoke different responses from officials, and the specific provisions of the six rape shield statutes also affect officials' judgments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84984327827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84984327827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1991.tb01062.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1991.tb01062.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84984327827

VL - 29

SP - 137

EP - 161

JO - Criminology

JF - Criminology

SN - 0011-1384

IS - 1

ER -