The Inventive, the Educated and the Creative: How Do They Affect Metropolitan Productivity?

Jose Lobo, Charlotta Mellander, Kevin Stolarick, Deborah Strumsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A longstanding research tradition assumes that endogenous technological development increases regional productivity. It has been assumed that measures of regional patenting activity or human capital are an adequate way to capture the endogenous creation of new ideas that result in productivity improvements. This process has been conceived as occurring in two stages. First, an invention or innovation is generated, and then it is developed and commercialized to create benefits for the individual or firm owning the idea. Typically these steps are combined into a single model of the "invention in/productivity out" variety. Using data on Gross Metropolitan Product per worker and on inventors, educational attainment, and creative workers (together with other important socioeconomic controls), we unpack the model back to the two-step process and use a SEM modeling framework to investigate the relationships among inventive activity and potential inventors, regional technology levels, and regional productivity outcomes. Our results show almost no significant direct relationship between invention and productivity, except through technology. Clearly, the simplification of the "invention in/productivity out" model does not hold, which supports other work that questions the use of patents and patenting related measures as meaningful innovation inputs to processes that generate regional productivity and productivity gains. We also find that the most effective measure of regional inventive capacity, in terms of its effect on technology, productivity, and productivity growth is the share of the workforce engaged in creative activities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)155-177
Number of pages23
JournalIndustry and Innovation
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Productivity
Patents and inventions
Innovation
Invention
Scanning electron microscopy

Keywords

  • creative class
  • human capital
  • Innovation
  • patents
  • productivity
  • regional technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

The Inventive, the Educated and the Creative : How Do They Affect Metropolitan Productivity? / Lobo, Jose; Mellander, Charlotta; Stolarick, Kevin; Strumsky, Deborah.

In: Industry and Innovation, Vol. 21, No. 2, 01.01.2014, p. 155-177.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4e1e1e98821a476fbd1cf1b443869f86,
title = "The Inventive, the Educated and the Creative: How Do They Affect Metropolitan Productivity?",
abstract = "A longstanding research tradition assumes that endogenous technological development increases regional productivity. It has been assumed that measures of regional patenting activity or human capital are an adequate way to capture the endogenous creation of new ideas that result in productivity improvements. This process has been conceived as occurring in two stages. First, an invention or innovation is generated, and then it is developed and commercialized to create benefits for the individual or firm owning the idea. Typically these steps are combined into a single model of the {"}invention in/productivity out{"} variety. Using data on Gross Metropolitan Product per worker and on inventors, educational attainment, and creative workers (together with other important socioeconomic controls), we unpack the model back to the two-step process and use a SEM modeling framework to investigate the relationships among inventive activity and potential inventors, regional technology levels, and regional productivity outcomes. Our results show almost no significant direct relationship between invention and productivity, except through technology. Clearly, the simplification of the {"}invention in/productivity out{"} model does not hold, which supports other work that questions the use of patents and patenting related measures as meaningful innovation inputs to processes that generate regional productivity and productivity gains. We also find that the most effective measure of regional inventive capacity, in terms of its effect on technology, productivity, and productivity growth is the share of the workforce engaged in creative activities.",
keywords = "creative class, human capital, Innovation, patents, productivity, regional technology",
author = "Jose Lobo and Charlotta Mellander and Kevin Stolarick and Deborah Strumsky",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13662716.2014.896602",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "155--177",
journal = "Industry and Innovation",
issn = "1366-2716",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Inventive, the Educated and the Creative

T2 - How Do They Affect Metropolitan Productivity?

AU - Lobo, Jose

AU - Mellander, Charlotta

AU - Stolarick, Kevin

AU - Strumsky, Deborah

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - A longstanding research tradition assumes that endogenous technological development increases regional productivity. It has been assumed that measures of regional patenting activity or human capital are an adequate way to capture the endogenous creation of new ideas that result in productivity improvements. This process has been conceived as occurring in two stages. First, an invention or innovation is generated, and then it is developed and commercialized to create benefits for the individual or firm owning the idea. Typically these steps are combined into a single model of the "invention in/productivity out" variety. Using data on Gross Metropolitan Product per worker and on inventors, educational attainment, and creative workers (together with other important socioeconomic controls), we unpack the model back to the two-step process and use a SEM modeling framework to investigate the relationships among inventive activity and potential inventors, regional technology levels, and regional productivity outcomes. Our results show almost no significant direct relationship between invention and productivity, except through technology. Clearly, the simplification of the "invention in/productivity out" model does not hold, which supports other work that questions the use of patents and patenting related measures as meaningful innovation inputs to processes that generate regional productivity and productivity gains. We also find that the most effective measure of regional inventive capacity, in terms of its effect on technology, productivity, and productivity growth is the share of the workforce engaged in creative activities.

AB - A longstanding research tradition assumes that endogenous technological development increases regional productivity. It has been assumed that measures of regional patenting activity or human capital are an adequate way to capture the endogenous creation of new ideas that result in productivity improvements. This process has been conceived as occurring in two stages. First, an invention or innovation is generated, and then it is developed and commercialized to create benefits for the individual or firm owning the idea. Typically these steps are combined into a single model of the "invention in/productivity out" variety. Using data on Gross Metropolitan Product per worker and on inventors, educational attainment, and creative workers (together with other important socioeconomic controls), we unpack the model back to the two-step process and use a SEM modeling framework to investigate the relationships among inventive activity and potential inventors, regional technology levels, and regional productivity outcomes. Our results show almost no significant direct relationship between invention and productivity, except through technology. Clearly, the simplification of the "invention in/productivity out" model does not hold, which supports other work that questions the use of patents and patenting related measures as meaningful innovation inputs to processes that generate regional productivity and productivity gains. We also find that the most effective measure of regional inventive capacity, in terms of its effect on technology, productivity, and productivity growth is the share of the workforce engaged in creative activities.

KW - creative class

KW - human capital

KW - Innovation

KW - patents

KW - productivity

KW - regional technology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896935855&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896935855&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13662716.2014.896602

DO - 10.1080/13662716.2014.896602

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84896935855

VL - 21

SP - 155

EP - 177

JO - Industry and Innovation

JF - Industry and Innovation

SN - 1366-2716

IS - 2

ER -