The Infrastructure Trolley Problem: Positioning Safe-to-fail Infrastructure for Climate Change Adaptation

Yeowon Kim, Mikhail Chester, Daniel A. Eisenberg, Charles Redman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Motivated by the need for cities to prepare for and adapt to climate change, we advance the paradigm of safe-to-fail by focusing on the decision dilemmas and the consideration of infrastructure failure consequences in developing infrastructure. Infrastructures are largely designed as fail-safe; that is, they are not intended to fail, and when failure happens, the consequences are severe. Safe-to-fail has been recently presented as the antithesis of fail-safe, without any specific guidance of what the paradigm is or how to apply it. There is an emerging need for stakeholders, including policy makers, planners, engineers, utilities, and communities to understand infrastructure failures, bring their knowledge into the infrastructure development process, and help adapt cities to unpredictable and changing climate risks. We frame safe-to-fail as an infrastructure development paradigm that internalizes the consequences of infrastructure failure in the development process. This framing of safe-to-fail further reveals an emerging “infrastructure trolley problem” where the adaptive capacity of some regions is improved at the expense of others. We demonstrate practical dilemmas in developing infrastructure under nonstationary climate and guide managing trade-offs in the prioritization of different consequences of infrastructure failure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalEarth's Future
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

positioning
infrastructure
climate change adaptation
prioritization
climate
stakeholder
climate change

Keywords

  • climate change adaptation
  • disaster risk management
  • extreme weather
  • infrastructure
  • resilience
  • safe-to-fail

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

The Infrastructure Trolley Problem : Positioning Safe-to-fail Infrastructure for Climate Change Adaptation. / Kim, Yeowon; Chester, Mikhail; Eisenberg, Daniel A.; Redman, Charles.

In: Earth's Future, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{07fd0a99a0ce48c38d3ed0d52b64012a,
title = "The Infrastructure Trolley Problem: Positioning Safe-to-fail Infrastructure for Climate Change Adaptation",
abstract = "Motivated by the need for cities to prepare for and adapt to climate change, we advance the paradigm of safe-to-fail by focusing on the decision dilemmas and the consideration of infrastructure failure consequences in developing infrastructure. Infrastructures are largely designed as fail-safe; that is, they are not intended to fail, and when failure happens, the consequences are severe. Safe-to-fail has been recently presented as the antithesis of fail-safe, without any specific guidance of what the paradigm is or how to apply it. There is an emerging need for stakeholders, including policy makers, planners, engineers, utilities, and communities to understand infrastructure failures, bring their knowledge into the infrastructure development process, and help adapt cities to unpredictable and changing climate risks. We frame safe-to-fail as an infrastructure development paradigm that internalizes the consequences of infrastructure failure in the development process. This framing of safe-to-fail further reveals an emerging “infrastructure trolley problem” where the adaptive capacity of some regions is improved at the expense of others. We demonstrate practical dilemmas in developing infrastructure under nonstationary climate and guide managing trade-offs in the prioritization of different consequences of infrastructure failure.",
keywords = "climate change adaptation, disaster risk management, extreme weather, infrastructure, resilience, safe-to-fail",
author = "Yeowon Kim and Mikhail Chester and Eisenberg, {Daniel A.} and Charles Redman",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1029/2019EF001208",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Earth's Future",
issn = "2328-4277",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Infrastructure Trolley Problem

T2 - Positioning Safe-to-fail Infrastructure for Climate Change Adaptation

AU - Kim, Yeowon

AU - Chester, Mikhail

AU - Eisenberg, Daniel A.

AU - Redman, Charles

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Motivated by the need for cities to prepare for and adapt to climate change, we advance the paradigm of safe-to-fail by focusing on the decision dilemmas and the consideration of infrastructure failure consequences in developing infrastructure. Infrastructures are largely designed as fail-safe; that is, they are not intended to fail, and when failure happens, the consequences are severe. Safe-to-fail has been recently presented as the antithesis of fail-safe, without any specific guidance of what the paradigm is or how to apply it. There is an emerging need for stakeholders, including policy makers, planners, engineers, utilities, and communities to understand infrastructure failures, bring their knowledge into the infrastructure development process, and help adapt cities to unpredictable and changing climate risks. We frame safe-to-fail as an infrastructure development paradigm that internalizes the consequences of infrastructure failure in the development process. This framing of safe-to-fail further reveals an emerging “infrastructure trolley problem” where the adaptive capacity of some regions is improved at the expense of others. We demonstrate practical dilemmas in developing infrastructure under nonstationary climate and guide managing trade-offs in the prioritization of different consequences of infrastructure failure.

AB - Motivated by the need for cities to prepare for and adapt to climate change, we advance the paradigm of safe-to-fail by focusing on the decision dilemmas and the consideration of infrastructure failure consequences in developing infrastructure. Infrastructures are largely designed as fail-safe; that is, they are not intended to fail, and when failure happens, the consequences are severe. Safe-to-fail has been recently presented as the antithesis of fail-safe, without any specific guidance of what the paradigm is or how to apply it. There is an emerging need for stakeholders, including policy makers, planners, engineers, utilities, and communities to understand infrastructure failures, bring their knowledge into the infrastructure development process, and help adapt cities to unpredictable and changing climate risks. We frame safe-to-fail as an infrastructure development paradigm that internalizes the consequences of infrastructure failure in the development process. This framing of safe-to-fail further reveals an emerging “infrastructure trolley problem” where the adaptive capacity of some regions is improved at the expense of others. We demonstrate practical dilemmas in developing infrastructure under nonstationary climate and guide managing trade-offs in the prioritization of different consequences of infrastructure failure.

KW - climate change adaptation

KW - disaster risk management

KW - extreme weather

KW - infrastructure

KW - resilience

KW - safe-to-fail

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068525659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068525659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1029/2019EF001208

DO - 10.1029/2019EF001208

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85068525659

JO - Earth's Future

JF - Earth's Future

SN - 2328-4277

ER -