The Influence of Jailhouse Informant Testimony on Jury Deliberation

Jonathan M. Golding, Jeffrey S. Neuschatz, Kyle P. Rawn, Anne Lippert, Brian H. Bornstein, Andrea M. Pals, Alexis M.Le Grand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of jailhouse informant testimony on mock juries. In addition to allowing for jury deliberations, individual judgments (as measured in most prior research) were examined. Two hundred ninety-one undergraduates, in five to six-member mock juries, heard a fictional murder trial summary in one of three conditions: jailhouse informant testified after receiving an incentive, jailhouse informant testified after receiving no incentive, or no jailhouse informant testimony. Participants made predeliberation judgments, deliberated on a verdict, and made postdeliberation judgments. The primary results showed that there were more guilty verdicts for juries that heard jailhouseinformant testimony than for those that did not hear such testimony. This relationship was fully mediated by perceptions of the defendant (e.g., sympathy for and credibility of). In addition, jury deliberations often produced a change in verdict; those who gave an initial guilty verdict were more likely to switch to not guilty after deliberation. Finally, cognitive network analyses showed that jailhouse informant testimony was the focus of jury deliberations for both guilty (viewed the testimony as reliable) and not guilty (viewed the testimony as unreliable) verdicts. Results are discussed in terms of the importance of how jailhouse informant testimony can influence jury deliberations in both a positive and negative way.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPsychology, Public Policy, and Law
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cognitive networks
  • Deliberations
  • Jailhouse informant
  • Jury
  • Law

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Influence of Jailhouse Informant Testimony on Jury Deliberation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this