The indexing ambiguity in serial femtosecond crystallography (SFX) resolved using an expectation maximization algorithm

Haiguang Liu, John Spence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

Crystallographic auto-indexing algorithms provide crystal orientations and unit-cell parameters and assign Miller indices based on the geometric relations between the Bragg peaks observed in diffraction patterns. However, if the Bravais symmetry is higher than the space-group symmetry, there will be multiple indexing options that are geometrically equivalent, and hence many ways to merge diffraction intensities from protein nanocrystals. Structure factor magnitudes from full reflections are required to resolve this ambiguity but only partial reflections are available from each XFEL shot, which must be merged to obtain full reflections from these 'stills'. To resolve this chicken-and-egg problem, an expectation maximization algorithm is described that iteratively constructs a model from the intensities recorded in the diffraction patterns as the indexing ambiguity is being resolved. The reconstructed model is then used to guide the resolution of the indexing ambiguity as feedback for the next iteration. Using both simulated and experimental data collected at an X-ray laser for photosystem I in the P63 space group (which supports a merohedral twinning indexing ambiguity), the method is validated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)393-401
Number of pages9
JournalIUCrJ
Volume1
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 10 2014

Keywords

  • XFELs
  • expectation maximization algorithm
  • indexing ambiguity
  • protein crystallography
  • serial femto second crystallography (SFX)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Chemistry
  • Biochemistry
  • General Materials Science
  • Condensed Matter Physics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The indexing ambiguity in serial femtosecond crystallography (SFX) resolved using an expectation maximization algorithm'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this