The Importance of Health and Social Services Spending to Health Outcomes in Texas, 2010-2016

J. Mac McCullough, Jonathon P. Leider

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Objectives Public health and social services spending have been shown to improve health outcomes at the county level, although there are significant state and regional variations in such spending. Texas offers an important opportunity for examining nuances in the patterns of association between local government health and social services spending and population health outcomes. The primary objectives of this study were to describe local investments in education, health, and social services at the county-area level for all of Texas from 2002 through 2012 and to examine how changes in local investment over time were associated with changes in health outcomes. Methods We used two large secondary data sources for this study. First, US Census Bureau data were used to measure annual spending by all local governments on public hospitals, community health care and public health, and >1 dozen social services. Second, County Health Rankings & Roadmaps data measured county health outcomes. We performed regression models to examine the association between increases in local government spending and a county's health outcomes ranking 4 years later. Multilevel mixed-effects linear regression models accounted for mean spending in each category, county health factors ranking, and county and state random effects. Results Local governments in Texas spent an average of $4717 per capita across all health and social services. Although spending was relatively consistent across 2002-2012, there was notable variation in spending across counties and services. Regression models found that changes in four spending categories were associated with significant improvements in health outcomes: fire and ambulance, community health care and public health, housing and community development, and libraries. For each, an additional one-time investment of $15 per capita was associated with a 1-spot improvement in statewide county health rankings within 4 years. Conclusions Existing evidence regarding the association between social services spending and health outcomes may not yield sufficiently granular data for policy makers within a single state. Investments in certain social services in Texas were associated with improvements in health outcomes, as measured by improvements in the County Health Rankings, in the years subsequent to spending increases. Similar analyses in other states and regions may yield actionable avenues for policy makers to improve population health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)91-97
Number of pages7
JournalSouthern medical journal
Volume112
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Fingerprint

Social Work
Health Services
Health
Local Government
Community Health Services
Administrative Personnel
Linear Models
Public Health
Public Housing
Social Planning
Ambulances
United States Public Health Service
Information Storage and Retrieval
Public Hospitals
Censuses
Population
Libraries
Education

Keywords

  • county health rankings
  • local government
  • population health
  • public health
  • social services

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The Importance of Health and Social Services Spending to Health Outcomes in Texas, 2010-2016. / Mac McCullough, J.; Leider, Jonathon P.

In: Southern medical journal, Vol. 112, No. 2, 01.02.2019, p. 91-97.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{196b3c879e974442a1410d937163e755,
title = "The Importance of Health and Social Services Spending to Health Outcomes in Texas, 2010-2016",
abstract = "Objectives Public health and social services spending have been shown to improve health outcomes at the county level, although there are significant state and regional variations in such spending. Texas offers an important opportunity for examining nuances in the patterns of association between local government health and social services spending and population health outcomes. The primary objectives of this study were to describe local investments in education, health, and social services at the county-area level for all of Texas from 2002 through 2012 and to examine how changes in local investment over time were associated with changes in health outcomes. Methods We used two large secondary data sources for this study. First, US Census Bureau data were used to measure annual spending by all local governments on public hospitals, community health care and public health, and >1 dozen social services. Second, County Health Rankings & Roadmaps data measured county health outcomes. We performed regression models to examine the association between increases in local government spending and a county's health outcomes ranking 4 years later. Multilevel mixed-effects linear regression models accounted for mean spending in each category, county health factors ranking, and county and state random effects. Results Local governments in Texas spent an average of $4717 per capita across all health and social services. Although spending was relatively consistent across 2002-2012, there was notable variation in spending across counties and services. Regression models found that changes in four spending categories were associated with significant improvements in health outcomes: fire and ambulance, community health care and public health, housing and community development, and libraries. For each, an additional one-time investment of $15 per capita was associated with a 1-spot improvement in statewide county health rankings within 4 years. Conclusions Existing evidence regarding the association between social services spending and health outcomes may not yield sufficiently granular data for policy makers within a single state. Investments in certain social services in Texas were associated with improvements in health outcomes, as measured by improvements in the County Health Rankings, in the years subsequent to spending increases. Similar analyses in other states and regions may yield actionable avenues for policy makers to improve population health.",
keywords = "county health rankings, local government, population health, public health, social services",
author = "{Mac McCullough}, J. and Leider, {Jonathon P.}",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000935",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "112",
pages = "91--97",
journal = "Southern Medical Journal",
issn = "0038-4348",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Importance of Health and Social Services Spending to Health Outcomes in Texas, 2010-2016

AU - Mac McCullough, J.

AU - Leider, Jonathon P.

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Objectives Public health and social services spending have been shown to improve health outcomes at the county level, although there are significant state and regional variations in such spending. Texas offers an important opportunity for examining nuances in the patterns of association between local government health and social services spending and population health outcomes. The primary objectives of this study were to describe local investments in education, health, and social services at the county-area level for all of Texas from 2002 through 2012 and to examine how changes in local investment over time were associated with changes in health outcomes. Methods We used two large secondary data sources for this study. First, US Census Bureau data were used to measure annual spending by all local governments on public hospitals, community health care and public health, and >1 dozen social services. Second, County Health Rankings & Roadmaps data measured county health outcomes. We performed regression models to examine the association between increases in local government spending and a county's health outcomes ranking 4 years later. Multilevel mixed-effects linear regression models accounted for mean spending in each category, county health factors ranking, and county and state random effects. Results Local governments in Texas spent an average of $4717 per capita across all health and social services. Although spending was relatively consistent across 2002-2012, there was notable variation in spending across counties and services. Regression models found that changes in four spending categories were associated with significant improvements in health outcomes: fire and ambulance, community health care and public health, housing and community development, and libraries. For each, an additional one-time investment of $15 per capita was associated with a 1-spot improvement in statewide county health rankings within 4 years. Conclusions Existing evidence regarding the association between social services spending and health outcomes may not yield sufficiently granular data for policy makers within a single state. Investments in certain social services in Texas were associated with improvements in health outcomes, as measured by improvements in the County Health Rankings, in the years subsequent to spending increases. Similar analyses in other states and regions may yield actionable avenues for policy makers to improve population health.

AB - Objectives Public health and social services spending have been shown to improve health outcomes at the county level, although there are significant state and regional variations in such spending. Texas offers an important opportunity for examining nuances in the patterns of association between local government health and social services spending and population health outcomes. The primary objectives of this study were to describe local investments in education, health, and social services at the county-area level for all of Texas from 2002 through 2012 and to examine how changes in local investment over time were associated with changes in health outcomes. Methods We used two large secondary data sources for this study. First, US Census Bureau data were used to measure annual spending by all local governments on public hospitals, community health care and public health, and >1 dozen social services. Second, County Health Rankings & Roadmaps data measured county health outcomes. We performed regression models to examine the association between increases in local government spending and a county's health outcomes ranking 4 years later. Multilevel mixed-effects linear regression models accounted for mean spending in each category, county health factors ranking, and county and state random effects. Results Local governments in Texas spent an average of $4717 per capita across all health and social services. Although spending was relatively consistent across 2002-2012, there was notable variation in spending across counties and services. Regression models found that changes in four spending categories were associated with significant improvements in health outcomes: fire and ambulance, community health care and public health, housing and community development, and libraries. For each, an additional one-time investment of $15 per capita was associated with a 1-spot improvement in statewide county health rankings within 4 years. Conclusions Existing evidence regarding the association between social services spending and health outcomes may not yield sufficiently granular data for policy makers within a single state. Investments in certain social services in Texas were associated with improvements in health outcomes, as measured by improvements in the County Health Rankings, in the years subsequent to spending increases. Similar analyses in other states and regions may yield actionable avenues for policy makers to improve population health.

KW - county health rankings

KW - local government

KW - population health

KW - public health

KW - social services

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060916968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060916968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000935

DO - 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000935

M3 - Review article

C2 - 30708373

AN - SCOPUS:85060916968

VL - 112

SP - 91

EP - 97

JO - Southern Medical Journal

JF - Southern Medical Journal

SN - 0038-4348

IS - 2

ER -