The impact of sex-role stereotypes on performance ratings and causal attributions of performance

Angelo J. Kinicki, Rodger W. Griffeth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The impact of sex-role stereotypes on performance ratings and causal attributions of performance were examined after controlling for confounding variables inherent in past research. One hundred forty-three subjects were given a case in which a stimulus person's performance on a preestablished sex-linked task was described. Extensive pretesting was conducted to obtain two occupations that were (1) sex linked and (2) equated along continua of social desirability, task difficulty, and status. Results revealed no significant Sex of Stimulus × Performance × Occupation interactions for any of the causes of performance, indicating that sex-role stereotypes may not have influenced attributions of performance. Sex-role stereotypes were also found to have a negligible effect on ratings of performance. Data are discussed in terms of the role of sex-related bias on performance ratings and treatment discrimination.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)155-170
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Vocational Behavior
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1985

Fingerprint

attribution
stereotype
rating
Occupations
performance
Social Desirability
Sexism
Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)
stimulus
occupation
Research
social desirability
Sex roles
Performance ratings
Stereotypes
Causal attributions
discrimination
cause
human being
trend

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Applied Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

The impact of sex-role stereotypes on performance ratings and causal attributions of performance. / Kinicki, Angelo J.; Griffeth, Rodger W.

In: Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 27, No. 2, 1985, p. 155-170.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kinicki, Angelo J. ; Griffeth, Rodger W. / The impact of sex-role stereotypes on performance ratings and causal attributions of performance. In: Journal of Vocational Behavior. 1985 ; Vol. 27, No. 2. pp. 155-170.
@article{5ed71610528d4634bcd983956d397f0d,
title = "The impact of sex-role stereotypes on performance ratings and causal attributions of performance",
abstract = "The impact of sex-role stereotypes on performance ratings and causal attributions of performance were examined after controlling for confounding variables inherent in past research. One hundred forty-three subjects were given a case in which a stimulus person's performance on a preestablished sex-linked task was described. Extensive pretesting was conducted to obtain two occupations that were (1) sex linked and (2) equated along continua of social desirability, task difficulty, and status. Results revealed no significant Sex of Stimulus × Performance × Occupation interactions for any of the causes of performance, indicating that sex-role stereotypes may not have influenced attributions of performance. Sex-role stereotypes were also found to have a negligible effect on ratings of performance. Data are discussed in terms of the role of sex-related bias on performance ratings and treatment discrimination.",
author = "Kinicki, {Angelo J.} and Griffeth, {Rodger W.}",
year = "1985",
doi = "10.1016/0001-8791(85)90030-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "155--170",
journal = "Journal of Vocational Behavior",
issn = "0001-8791",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of sex-role stereotypes on performance ratings and causal attributions of performance

AU - Kinicki, Angelo J.

AU - Griffeth, Rodger W.

PY - 1985

Y1 - 1985

N2 - The impact of sex-role stereotypes on performance ratings and causal attributions of performance were examined after controlling for confounding variables inherent in past research. One hundred forty-three subjects were given a case in which a stimulus person's performance on a preestablished sex-linked task was described. Extensive pretesting was conducted to obtain two occupations that were (1) sex linked and (2) equated along continua of social desirability, task difficulty, and status. Results revealed no significant Sex of Stimulus × Performance × Occupation interactions for any of the causes of performance, indicating that sex-role stereotypes may not have influenced attributions of performance. Sex-role stereotypes were also found to have a negligible effect on ratings of performance. Data are discussed in terms of the role of sex-related bias on performance ratings and treatment discrimination.

AB - The impact of sex-role stereotypes on performance ratings and causal attributions of performance were examined after controlling for confounding variables inherent in past research. One hundred forty-three subjects were given a case in which a stimulus person's performance on a preestablished sex-linked task was described. Extensive pretesting was conducted to obtain two occupations that were (1) sex linked and (2) equated along continua of social desirability, task difficulty, and status. Results revealed no significant Sex of Stimulus × Performance × Occupation interactions for any of the causes of performance, indicating that sex-role stereotypes may not have influenced attributions of performance. Sex-role stereotypes were also found to have a negligible effect on ratings of performance. Data are discussed in terms of the role of sex-related bias on performance ratings and treatment discrimination.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0011589398&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0011589398&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0001-8791(85)90030-2

DO - 10.1016/0001-8791(85)90030-2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0011589398

VL - 27

SP - 155

EP - 170

JO - Journal of Vocational Behavior

JF - Journal of Vocational Behavior

SN - 0001-8791

IS - 2

ER -