The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity

Sooho Lee, Barry Bozeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

681 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Based on the curricula vitae and survey responses of 443 academic scientists affiliated with university research centers in the USA, we examine the long-standing assumption that research collaboration has a positive effect on publishing productivity. Since characteristics of the individual and the work environment are endogenously related to both collaboration and productivity, this study focuses on the mediating effect of collaboration on publishing productivity. By using the two-stage least squares analysis, the findings indicate that in the presence of moderating variables such as age, rank, grant, gender, marital status, family relations, citizenship, job satisfaction, perceived discrimination, and collaboration strategy, the simple number ('normal count') of peer-reviewed journal papers is strongly and significantly associated with the number of collaborators. However, the net impacts of collaboration are less clear. When we apply the same model and examine productivity by 'fractional count', dividing the number of publications by the number of authors, we find that number of collaborators is not a significant predictor of publishing productivity. In both cases, 'normal count' and 'fractional count', we find significant effects of research grants, citizenship, collaboration strategy, and scientific field. We believe that it is important to understand the effects of the individual and environmental factors for developing effective strategies to exploit the potential benefits of collaboration. We note that our focus is entirely at the individual level, and some of the most important benefits of collaboration may accrue to groups, institutions, and scientific fields.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)673-702
Number of pages30
JournalSocial Studies of Science
Volume35
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

productivity
grant
citizenship
university research
Research Collaboration
Productivity
job satisfaction
marital status
work environment
environmental factors
discrimination
curriculum
gender
Group
Citizenship
Collaborators

Keywords

  • Normal and fractional publication counts
  • Research collaboration
  • Scientific productivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. / Lee, Sooho; Bozeman, Barry.

In: Social Studies of Science, Vol. 35, No. 5, 2005, p. 673-702.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5b6e51ab43c541dc902839164d7b3aa5,
title = "The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity",
abstract = "Based on the curricula vitae and survey responses of 443 academic scientists affiliated with university research centers in the USA, we examine the long-standing assumption that research collaboration has a positive effect on publishing productivity. Since characteristics of the individual and the work environment are endogenously related to both collaboration and productivity, this study focuses on the mediating effect of collaboration on publishing productivity. By using the two-stage least squares analysis, the findings indicate that in the presence of moderating variables such as age, rank, grant, gender, marital status, family relations, citizenship, job satisfaction, perceived discrimination, and collaboration strategy, the simple number ('normal count') of peer-reviewed journal papers is strongly and significantly associated with the number of collaborators. However, the net impacts of collaboration are less clear. When we apply the same model and examine productivity by 'fractional count', dividing the number of publications by the number of authors, we find that number of collaborators is not a significant predictor of publishing productivity. In both cases, 'normal count' and 'fractional count', we find significant effects of research grants, citizenship, collaboration strategy, and scientific field. We believe that it is important to understand the effects of the individual and environmental factors for developing effective strategies to exploit the potential benefits of collaboration. We note that our focus is entirely at the individual level, and some of the most important benefits of collaboration may accrue to groups, institutions, and scientific fields.",
keywords = "Normal and fractional publication counts, Research collaboration, Scientific productivity",
author = "Sooho Lee and Barry Bozeman",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1177/0306312705052359",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "673--702",
journal = "Social Studies of Science",
issn = "0306-3127",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity

AU - Lee, Sooho

AU - Bozeman, Barry

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Based on the curricula vitae and survey responses of 443 academic scientists affiliated with university research centers in the USA, we examine the long-standing assumption that research collaboration has a positive effect on publishing productivity. Since characteristics of the individual and the work environment are endogenously related to both collaboration and productivity, this study focuses on the mediating effect of collaboration on publishing productivity. By using the two-stage least squares analysis, the findings indicate that in the presence of moderating variables such as age, rank, grant, gender, marital status, family relations, citizenship, job satisfaction, perceived discrimination, and collaboration strategy, the simple number ('normal count') of peer-reviewed journal papers is strongly and significantly associated with the number of collaborators. However, the net impacts of collaboration are less clear. When we apply the same model and examine productivity by 'fractional count', dividing the number of publications by the number of authors, we find that number of collaborators is not a significant predictor of publishing productivity. In both cases, 'normal count' and 'fractional count', we find significant effects of research grants, citizenship, collaboration strategy, and scientific field. We believe that it is important to understand the effects of the individual and environmental factors for developing effective strategies to exploit the potential benefits of collaboration. We note that our focus is entirely at the individual level, and some of the most important benefits of collaboration may accrue to groups, institutions, and scientific fields.

AB - Based on the curricula vitae and survey responses of 443 academic scientists affiliated with university research centers in the USA, we examine the long-standing assumption that research collaboration has a positive effect on publishing productivity. Since characteristics of the individual and the work environment are endogenously related to both collaboration and productivity, this study focuses on the mediating effect of collaboration on publishing productivity. By using the two-stage least squares analysis, the findings indicate that in the presence of moderating variables such as age, rank, grant, gender, marital status, family relations, citizenship, job satisfaction, perceived discrimination, and collaboration strategy, the simple number ('normal count') of peer-reviewed journal papers is strongly and significantly associated with the number of collaborators. However, the net impacts of collaboration are less clear. When we apply the same model and examine productivity by 'fractional count', dividing the number of publications by the number of authors, we find that number of collaborators is not a significant predictor of publishing productivity. In both cases, 'normal count' and 'fractional count', we find significant effects of research grants, citizenship, collaboration strategy, and scientific field. We believe that it is important to understand the effects of the individual and environmental factors for developing effective strategies to exploit the potential benefits of collaboration. We note that our focus is entirely at the individual level, and some of the most important benefits of collaboration may accrue to groups, institutions, and scientific fields.

KW - Normal and fractional publication counts

KW - Research collaboration

KW - Scientific productivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27144502742&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27144502742&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0306312705052359

DO - 10.1177/0306312705052359

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 673

EP - 702

JO - Social Studies of Science

JF - Social Studies of Science

SN - 0306-3127

IS - 5

ER -