The impact of minimising specifications and management at the University of Hawaii

Dean Kashiwagi, Darshit Parmar, John Savicky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The University of Hawaii was searching for modifications to their construction delivery process that would increase the value and performance of construction and the efficiency of their project management group. The university had been plagued by poor construction performance (not on time, not on budget, and not meeting quality expectations). Their goal was to do more construction (with fewer project managers) and minimise the risk of construction non-performance. The university wanted to study the impact of specifications, construction management, inspections and the existing low-bid process on construction performance. The Performance Information Procurement System (PIPS) was selected due to its documented results in delivering high performance. There were two objectives for implementing the PIPS process. The first objective was to determine whether the university could procure higher quality construction projects by minimising management, regulations, qualifications, user specifications and inspections. The second objective of the test would be to document the impact of the PIPS process and satisfaction level of the different parties (contractors, designers, procurement personnel, lawyers, facilities engineers and university leaders) involved in this process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)131-141
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Facilities Management
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2003

Fingerprint

Specifications
Information systems
Inspection
Project management
Contractors
Managers
Procurement
Personnel
Engineers

Keywords

  • Construction performance
  • Decision analysis
  • Information management
  • Quality procurement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Business and International Management

Cite this

The impact of minimising specifications and management at the University of Hawaii. / Kashiwagi, Dean; Parmar, Darshit; Savicky, John.

In: Journal of Facilities Management, Vol. 2, No. 2, 01.04.2003, p. 131-141.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kashiwagi, Dean ; Parmar, Darshit ; Savicky, John. / The impact of minimising specifications and management at the University of Hawaii. In: Journal of Facilities Management. 2003 ; Vol. 2, No. 2. pp. 131-141.
@article{a025f8ededa64e6cb5d3942ffe5375f0,
title = "The impact of minimising specifications and management at the University of Hawaii",
abstract = "The University of Hawaii was searching for modifications to their construction delivery process that would increase the value and performance of construction and the efficiency of their project management group. The university had been plagued by poor construction performance (not on time, not on budget, and not meeting quality expectations). Their goal was to do more construction (with fewer project managers) and minimise the risk of construction non-performance. The university wanted to study the impact of specifications, construction management, inspections and the existing low-bid process on construction performance. The Performance Information Procurement System (PIPS) was selected due to its documented results in delivering high performance. There were two objectives for implementing the PIPS process. The first objective was to determine whether the university could procure higher quality construction projects by minimising management, regulations, qualifications, user specifications and inspections. The second objective of the test would be to document the impact of the PIPS process and satisfaction level of the different parties (contractors, designers, procurement personnel, lawyers, facilities engineers and university leaders) involved in this process.",
keywords = "Construction performance, Decision analysis, Information management, Quality procurement",
author = "Dean Kashiwagi and Darshit Parmar and John Savicky",
year = "2003",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/14725960410808168",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "131--141",
journal = "Journal of Facilities Management",
issn = "1472-5967",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of minimising specifications and management at the University of Hawaii

AU - Kashiwagi, Dean

AU - Parmar, Darshit

AU - Savicky, John

PY - 2003/4/1

Y1 - 2003/4/1

N2 - The University of Hawaii was searching for modifications to their construction delivery process that would increase the value and performance of construction and the efficiency of their project management group. The university had been plagued by poor construction performance (not on time, not on budget, and not meeting quality expectations). Their goal was to do more construction (with fewer project managers) and minimise the risk of construction non-performance. The university wanted to study the impact of specifications, construction management, inspections and the existing low-bid process on construction performance. The Performance Information Procurement System (PIPS) was selected due to its documented results in delivering high performance. There were two objectives for implementing the PIPS process. The first objective was to determine whether the university could procure higher quality construction projects by minimising management, regulations, qualifications, user specifications and inspections. The second objective of the test would be to document the impact of the PIPS process and satisfaction level of the different parties (contractors, designers, procurement personnel, lawyers, facilities engineers and university leaders) involved in this process.

AB - The University of Hawaii was searching for modifications to their construction delivery process that would increase the value and performance of construction and the efficiency of their project management group. The university had been plagued by poor construction performance (not on time, not on budget, and not meeting quality expectations). Their goal was to do more construction (with fewer project managers) and minimise the risk of construction non-performance. The university wanted to study the impact of specifications, construction management, inspections and the existing low-bid process on construction performance. The Performance Information Procurement System (PIPS) was selected due to its documented results in delivering high performance. There were two objectives for implementing the PIPS process. The first objective was to determine whether the university could procure higher quality construction projects by minimising management, regulations, qualifications, user specifications and inspections. The second objective of the test would be to document the impact of the PIPS process and satisfaction level of the different parties (contractors, designers, procurement personnel, lawyers, facilities engineers and university leaders) involved in this process.

KW - Construction performance

KW - Decision analysis

KW - Information management

KW - Quality procurement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991362664&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84991362664&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/14725960410808168

DO - 10.1108/14725960410808168

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84991362664

VL - 2

SP - 131

EP - 141

JO - Journal of Facilities Management

JF - Journal of Facilities Management

SN - 1472-5967

IS - 2

ER -