@article{6b490f37816e44a0a751228058b2f07f,
title = "The Impact of Demographic Composition of Social Networks on Perceived Inclusion in the Workplace",
abstract = "Inclusion in the workplace is defined as the extent to which individuals perceive that they are part of significant processes in organizations. This article explores the determinants of workplace inclusion by asking: How does the demographic composition of social networks inside and outside of the workplace affect perceived inclusion in the workplace? We apply literature on social identity theory and social network theory to develop and test hypotheses on professional sub-network demographic composition using the linear regression analysis on data from the 2011 National Science Foundation–funded national survey of academic faculty on work environment and careers in US universities. Among other results, we find that perceived inclusion is explained by the interactions between race, gender, and demographic composition of professional networks. Findings provide new insights for the management of diversity in the workplace.",
author = "Heyjie Jung and Welch, {Eric W.}",
note = "Funding Information: The authors would like to extend their gratitude to the many colleagues who have contributed to their thinking and work on restorative approaches. Special thanks to Chris Marshall and Carolyn Cranfield for their input into definitions; Dr Andrew Simpson, Mesh Down Under and the Victoria University of Wellington team for their work on the surgical mesh response in New Zealand; James Titcombe and Linda Kenward. The authors also thank Carl Shuker and Graham Martin for their comments on an early draft of the manuscript. Jo Wailling is funded by Te Ngāpara Centre for Restorative Practice, Victoria University of Wellington. Jane K. O'Hara is funded by the National Institute for Health Research Yorkshire & Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre. The publication is informed and supported by research funded by the New Zealand Ministry of Health and Te Ngāpara Centre for Restorative Practice. This publication is also based on research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (HS&DR [18/10/02]). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the New Zealand Ministry of Health, NIHR, or the Department of Health and Social Care. Funding Information: We thank the anonymous reviewers of this manuscript, the US National Science Foundation for its generous support of this research (Grants DGE #1661206 and DRL #0910191) and the many individuals who took the time to respond to the survey. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 by The American Society for Public Administration.",
year = "2022",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/puar.13470",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "522--536",
journal = "Public Administration Review",
issn = "0033-3352",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",
}