The impact of broadly relevant novel discoveries on student project ownership in a traditional lab course turned CURE

Katelyn M. Cooper, Joseph N. Blattman, Taija Hendrix, Sara E. Brownell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) have been shown to lead to multiple student benefits, but much is unknown about how CUREs lead to specific student outcomes. In this study, we examined the extent to which students making “broadly relevant novel discoveries” impacted student project ownership by comparing the experiences of students in a CURE and a traditional lab course. The CURE and traditional lab were similar in most aspects; students were exposed to an identical curriculum taught by the same instructor. However, there was one major difference between the two types of courses: the type of data that the students produced. Students in the traditional lab characterized the immune system of wild-type mice, thereby confirming results already known to the scientific community, while students in the CURE characterized the immune system of a mutant strain of mice, which produced broadly relevant novel discoveries. Compared with traditional lab students, CURE students reported higher cognitive and emotional ownership over their projects. Students’ perceptions of collaboration and making broadly relevant novel discoveries were significantly and positively related to their cognitive and emotional ownership. This work provides insight into the importance of integrating opportunities for broadly relevant novel discoveries in lab courses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberar57
JournalCBE life sciences education
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ownership
Students
Research
experience
student
Immune system
Immune System
Mutant Strains Mice
scientific community
Curriculum
Curricula
instructor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Cite this

The impact of broadly relevant novel discoveries on student project ownership in a traditional lab course turned CURE. / Cooper, Katelyn M.; Blattman, Joseph N.; Hendrix, Taija; Brownell, Sara E.

In: CBE life sciences education, Vol. 18, No. 4, ar57, 01.12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{309bd7259d904e4bbcdffdb7a598377c,
title = "The impact of broadly relevant novel discoveries on student project ownership in a traditional lab course turned CURE",
abstract = "Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) have been shown to lead to multiple student benefits, but much is unknown about how CUREs lead to specific student outcomes. In this study, we examined the extent to which students making “broadly relevant novel discoveries” impacted student project ownership by comparing the experiences of students in a CURE and a traditional lab course. The CURE and traditional lab were similar in most aspects; students were exposed to an identical curriculum taught by the same instructor. However, there was one major difference between the two types of courses: the type of data that the students produced. Students in the traditional lab characterized the immune system of wild-type mice, thereby confirming results already known to the scientific community, while students in the CURE characterized the immune system of a mutant strain of mice, which produced broadly relevant novel discoveries. Compared with traditional lab students, CURE students reported higher cognitive and emotional ownership over their projects. Students’ perceptions of collaboration and making broadly relevant novel discoveries were significantly and positively related to their cognitive and emotional ownership. This work provides insight into the importance of integrating opportunities for broadly relevant novel discoveries in lab courses.",
author = "Cooper, {Katelyn M.} and Blattman, {Joseph N.} and Taija Hendrix and Brownell, {Sara E.}",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1187/cbe.19-06-0113",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
journal = "CBE Life Sciences Education",
issn = "1931-7913",
publisher = "American Society for Cell Biology",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of broadly relevant novel discoveries on student project ownership in a traditional lab course turned CURE

AU - Cooper, Katelyn M.

AU - Blattman, Joseph N.

AU - Hendrix, Taija

AU - Brownell, Sara E.

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) have been shown to lead to multiple student benefits, but much is unknown about how CUREs lead to specific student outcomes. In this study, we examined the extent to which students making “broadly relevant novel discoveries” impacted student project ownership by comparing the experiences of students in a CURE and a traditional lab course. The CURE and traditional lab were similar in most aspects; students were exposed to an identical curriculum taught by the same instructor. However, there was one major difference between the two types of courses: the type of data that the students produced. Students in the traditional lab characterized the immune system of wild-type mice, thereby confirming results already known to the scientific community, while students in the CURE characterized the immune system of a mutant strain of mice, which produced broadly relevant novel discoveries. Compared with traditional lab students, CURE students reported higher cognitive and emotional ownership over their projects. Students’ perceptions of collaboration and making broadly relevant novel discoveries were significantly and positively related to their cognitive and emotional ownership. This work provides insight into the importance of integrating opportunities for broadly relevant novel discoveries in lab courses.

AB - Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) have been shown to lead to multiple student benefits, but much is unknown about how CUREs lead to specific student outcomes. In this study, we examined the extent to which students making “broadly relevant novel discoveries” impacted student project ownership by comparing the experiences of students in a CURE and a traditional lab course. The CURE and traditional lab were similar in most aspects; students were exposed to an identical curriculum taught by the same instructor. However, there was one major difference between the two types of courses: the type of data that the students produced. Students in the traditional lab characterized the immune system of wild-type mice, thereby confirming results already known to the scientific community, while students in the CURE characterized the immune system of a mutant strain of mice, which produced broadly relevant novel discoveries. Compared with traditional lab students, CURE students reported higher cognitive and emotional ownership over their projects. Students’ perceptions of collaboration and making broadly relevant novel discoveries were significantly and positively related to their cognitive and emotional ownership. This work provides insight into the importance of integrating opportunities for broadly relevant novel discoveries in lab courses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074431920&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074431920&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1187/cbe.19-06-0113

DO - 10.1187/cbe.19-06-0113

M3 - Article

C2 - 31675275

AN - SCOPUS:85074431920

VL - 18

JO - CBE Life Sciences Education

JF - CBE Life Sciences Education

SN - 1931-7913

IS - 4

M1 - ar57

ER -