The illusion of knowing

Failure in the self-assessment of comprehension

Arthur Glenberg, Alex Cherry Wilkinson, William Epstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

243 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The illusion of knowing is the belief that comprehension has been attained when, in fact, comprehension has failed. In the present experiment, the illusion was defined operationally as having occurred when readers who failed to find a contradiction in a text rated their comprehension of the text as high. Texts containing contradictions between adjacent sentences were presented, and readers were explicitly asked to search for contradictions. The frequency of illusions was greater when the contradictory sentences came at the end of three-paragraph texts rather than at the end of one-paragraph texts and when the contradictory information was syntactically marked as new. These results are interpreted within a framework that emphasizes that the goal of reading expository text is to establish coherence within and among sentences. In addition, the results are apparently incompatible with the notion that readers engage in active and accurate on-line monitoring of the degree to which this goal is met.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)597-602
Number of pages6
JournalMemory & Cognition
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1982
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reading
Self-assessment
Illusion
Self-Assessment
Reader
Contradictory
Paragraph
Monitoring
Expository Text
Syntax
Experiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

The illusion of knowing : Failure in the self-assessment of comprehension. / Glenberg, Arthur; Wilkinson, Alex Cherry; Epstein, William.

In: Memory & Cognition, Vol. 10, No. 6, 11.1982, p. 597-602.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Glenberg, Arthur ; Wilkinson, Alex Cherry ; Epstein, William. / The illusion of knowing : Failure in the self-assessment of comprehension. In: Memory & Cognition. 1982 ; Vol. 10, No. 6. pp. 597-602.
@article{f3c942d6d4f4433c87c6274ee5dccbd6,
title = "The illusion of knowing: Failure in the self-assessment of comprehension",
abstract = "The illusion of knowing is the belief that comprehension has been attained when, in fact, comprehension has failed. In the present experiment, the illusion was defined operationally as having occurred when readers who failed to find a contradiction in a text rated their comprehension of the text as high. Texts containing contradictions between adjacent sentences were presented, and readers were explicitly asked to search for contradictions. The frequency of illusions was greater when the contradictory sentences came at the end of three-paragraph texts rather than at the end of one-paragraph texts and when the contradictory information was syntactically marked as new. These results are interpreted within a framework that emphasizes that the goal of reading expository text is to establish coherence within and among sentences. In addition, the results are apparently incompatible with the notion that readers engage in active and accurate on-line monitoring of the degree to which this goal is met.",
author = "Arthur Glenberg and Wilkinson, {Alex Cherry} and William Epstein",
year = "1982",
month = "11",
doi = "10.3758/BF03202442",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "597--602",
journal = "Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0090-502X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The illusion of knowing

T2 - Failure in the self-assessment of comprehension

AU - Glenberg, Arthur

AU - Wilkinson, Alex Cherry

AU - Epstein, William

PY - 1982/11

Y1 - 1982/11

N2 - The illusion of knowing is the belief that comprehension has been attained when, in fact, comprehension has failed. In the present experiment, the illusion was defined operationally as having occurred when readers who failed to find a contradiction in a text rated their comprehension of the text as high. Texts containing contradictions between adjacent sentences were presented, and readers were explicitly asked to search for contradictions. The frequency of illusions was greater when the contradictory sentences came at the end of three-paragraph texts rather than at the end of one-paragraph texts and when the contradictory information was syntactically marked as new. These results are interpreted within a framework that emphasizes that the goal of reading expository text is to establish coherence within and among sentences. In addition, the results are apparently incompatible with the notion that readers engage in active and accurate on-line monitoring of the degree to which this goal is met.

AB - The illusion of knowing is the belief that comprehension has been attained when, in fact, comprehension has failed. In the present experiment, the illusion was defined operationally as having occurred when readers who failed to find a contradiction in a text rated their comprehension of the text as high. Texts containing contradictions between adjacent sentences were presented, and readers were explicitly asked to search for contradictions. The frequency of illusions was greater when the contradictory sentences came at the end of three-paragraph texts rather than at the end of one-paragraph texts and when the contradictory information was syntactically marked as new. These results are interpreted within a framework that emphasizes that the goal of reading expository text is to establish coherence within and among sentences. In addition, the results are apparently incompatible with the notion that readers engage in active and accurate on-line monitoring of the degree to which this goal is met.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864891749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864891749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03202442

DO - 10.3758/BF03202442

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 597

EP - 602

JO - Memory and Cognition

JF - Memory and Cognition

SN - 0090-502X

IS - 6

ER -