The ideal reporting interval for an epidemic to objectively interpret the epidemiological time course

Hiroshi Nishiura, Gerardo Chowell, Hans Heesterbeek, Jacco Wallinga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The reporting interval of infectious diseases is often determined as a time unit in the calendar regardless of the epidemiological characteristics of the disease. No guidelines have been proposed to choose the reporting interval of infectious diseases. The present study aims at translating coarsely reported epidemic data into the reproduction number and clarifying the ideal reporting interval to offer detailed insights into the time course of an epidemic. We briefly revisit the dispersibility ratio, i.e. ratio of cases in successive reporting intervals, proposed by Clare Oswald Stallybrass, detecting technical flaws in the historical studies. We derive a corrected expression for this quantity and propose simple algorithms to estimate the effective reproduction number as a function of time, adjusting the reporting interval to the generation time of a disease and demonstrating a clear relationship among the generation-time distribution, reporting interval and growth rate of an epidemic. Our exercise suggests that an ideal reporting interval is the mean generation time, so that the ratio of cases in successive intervals can yield the reproduction number. When it is impractical to report observations every mean generation time, we also present an alternative method that enables us to obtain straightforward estimates of the reproduction number for any reporting interval that suits the practical purpose of infection control.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)297-307
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the Royal Society Interface
Volume7
Issue number43
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 6 2010

Fingerprint

Reproduction
Disease Notification
Defects
Infection Control
Guidelines
Growth

Keywords

  • Disease outbreaks
  • Infection
  • Infectious disease reporting
  • Influenza
  • Smallpox
  • Statistical model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Biotechnology
  • Bioengineering
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Biomaterials
  • Biochemistry

Cite this

The ideal reporting interval for an epidemic to objectively interpret the epidemiological time course. / Nishiura, Hiroshi; Chowell, Gerardo; Heesterbeek, Hans; Wallinga, Jacco.

In: Journal of the Royal Society Interface, Vol. 7, No. 43, 06.02.2010, p. 297-307.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nishiura, Hiroshi ; Chowell, Gerardo ; Heesterbeek, Hans ; Wallinga, Jacco. / The ideal reporting interval for an epidemic to objectively interpret the epidemiological time course. In: Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 2010 ; Vol. 7, No. 43. pp. 297-307.
@article{5aa8582d384f4504bcaa285b5f3875a0,
title = "The ideal reporting interval for an epidemic to objectively interpret the epidemiological time course",
abstract = "The reporting interval of infectious diseases is often determined as a time unit in the calendar regardless of the epidemiological characteristics of the disease. No guidelines have been proposed to choose the reporting interval of infectious diseases. The present study aims at translating coarsely reported epidemic data into the reproduction number and clarifying the ideal reporting interval to offer detailed insights into the time course of an epidemic. We briefly revisit the dispersibility ratio, i.e. ratio of cases in successive reporting intervals, proposed by Clare Oswald Stallybrass, detecting technical flaws in the historical studies. We derive a corrected expression for this quantity and propose simple algorithms to estimate the effective reproduction number as a function of time, adjusting the reporting interval to the generation time of a disease and demonstrating a clear relationship among the generation-time distribution, reporting interval and growth rate of an epidemic. Our exercise suggests that an ideal reporting interval is the mean generation time, so that the ratio of cases in successive intervals can yield the reproduction number. When it is impractical to report observations every mean generation time, we also present an alternative method that enables us to obtain straightforward estimates of the reproduction number for any reporting interval that suits the practical purpose of infection control.",
keywords = "Disease outbreaks, Infection, Infectious disease reporting, Influenza, Smallpox, Statistical model",
author = "Hiroshi Nishiura and Gerardo Chowell and Hans Heesterbeek and Jacco Wallinga",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1098/rsif.2009.0153",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "297--307",
journal = "Journal of the Royal Society Interface",
issn = "1742-5689",
publisher = "Royal Society of London",
number = "43",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The ideal reporting interval for an epidemic to objectively interpret the epidemiological time course

AU - Nishiura, Hiroshi

AU - Chowell, Gerardo

AU - Heesterbeek, Hans

AU - Wallinga, Jacco

PY - 2010/2/6

Y1 - 2010/2/6

N2 - The reporting interval of infectious diseases is often determined as a time unit in the calendar regardless of the epidemiological characteristics of the disease. No guidelines have been proposed to choose the reporting interval of infectious diseases. The present study aims at translating coarsely reported epidemic data into the reproduction number and clarifying the ideal reporting interval to offer detailed insights into the time course of an epidemic. We briefly revisit the dispersibility ratio, i.e. ratio of cases in successive reporting intervals, proposed by Clare Oswald Stallybrass, detecting technical flaws in the historical studies. We derive a corrected expression for this quantity and propose simple algorithms to estimate the effective reproduction number as a function of time, adjusting the reporting interval to the generation time of a disease and demonstrating a clear relationship among the generation-time distribution, reporting interval and growth rate of an epidemic. Our exercise suggests that an ideal reporting interval is the mean generation time, so that the ratio of cases in successive intervals can yield the reproduction number. When it is impractical to report observations every mean generation time, we also present an alternative method that enables us to obtain straightforward estimates of the reproduction number for any reporting interval that suits the practical purpose of infection control.

AB - The reporting interval of infectious diseases is often determined as a time unit in the calendar regardless of the epidemiological characteristics of the disease. No guidelines have been proposed to choose the reporting interval of infectious diseases. The present study aims at translating coarsely reported epidemic data into the reproduction number and clarifying the ideal reporting interval to offer detailed insights into the time course of an epidemic. We briefly revisit the dispersibility ratio, i.e. ratio of cases in successive reporting intervals, proposed by Clare Oswald Stallybrass, detecting technical flaws in the historical studies. We derive a corrected expression for this quantity and propose simple algorithms to estimate the effective reproduction number as a function of time, adjusting the reporting interval to the generation time of a disease and demonstrating a clear relationship among the generation-time distribution, reporting interval and growth rate of an epidemic. Our exercise suggests that an ideal reporting interval is the mean generation time, so that the ratio of cases in successive intervals can yield the reproduction number. When it is impractical to report observations every mean generation time, we also present an alternative method that enables us to obtain straightforward estimates of the reproduction number for any reporting interval that suits the practical purpose of infection control.

KW - Disease outbreaks

KW - Infection

KW - Infectious disease reporting

KW - Influenza

KW - Smallpox

KW - Statistical model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74049100933&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=74049100933&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1098/rsif.2009.0153

DO - 10.1098/rsif.2009.0153

M3 - Article

C2 - 19570792

AN - SCOPUS:74049100933

VL - 7

SP - 297

EP - 307

JO - Journal of the Royal Society Interface

JF - Journal of the Royal Society Interface

SN - 1742-5689

IS - 43

ER -