The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

352 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article describes the ICAP framework that defines cognitive engagement activities on the basis of students’ overt behaviors and proposes that engagement behaviors can be categorized and differentiated into one of four modes: Interactive, Constructive, Active, and Passive. The ICAP hypothesis predicts that as students become more engaged with the learning materials, from passive to active to constructive to interactive, their learning will increase. We suggest possible knowledge-change processes that support the ICAP hypothesis and address the limitations and caveats of the hypothesis. In addition, empirical validation for the hypothesis is provided by examining laboratory and classroom studies that focus on three specific engagement activities: note taking, concept mapping and self-explaining. We also consider how ICAP can be used as a tool for explaining discrepant findings, dictate the proper choice of a control condition, and evaluate students’ outputs. Finally, we briefly compare ICAP to existing theories of learning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)219-243
Number of pages25
JournalEducational Psychologist
Volume49
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 19 2014

Fingerprint

Problem-Based Learning
Students
Learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

The ICAP Framework : Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes. / Chi, Michelene; Wylie, Ruth.

In: Educational Psychologist, Vol. 49, No. 4, 19.10.2014, p. 219-243.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{93836ac88cb346cbbc6e51c6d94509f3,
title = "The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes",
abstract = "This article describes the ICAP framework that defines cognitive engagement activities on the basis of students’ overt behaviors and proposes that engagement behaviors can be categorized and differentiated into one of four modes: Interactive, Constructive, Active, and Passive. The ICAP hypothesis predicts that as students become more engaged with the learning materials, from passive to active to constructive to interactive, their learning will increase. We suggest possible knowledge-change processes that support the ICAP hypothesis and address the limitations and caveats of the hypothesis. In addition, empirical validation for the hypothesis is provided by examining laboratory and classroom studies that focus on three specific engagement activities: note taking, concept mapping and self-explaining. We also consider how ICAP can be used as a tool for explaining discrepant findings, dictate the proper choice of a control condition, and evaluate students’ outputs. Finally, we briefly compare ICAP to existing theories of learning.",
author = "Michelene Chi and Ruth Wylie",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1080/00461520.2014.965823",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "219--243",
journal = "Educational Psychologist",
issn = "0046-1520",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The ICAP Framework

T2 - Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes

AU - Chi, Michelene

AU - Wylie, Ruth

PY - 2014/10/19

Y1 - 2014/10/19

N2 - This article describes the ICAP framework that defines cognitive engagement activities on the basis of students’ overt behaviors and proposes that engagement behaviors can be categorized and differentiated into one of four modes: Interactive, Constructive, Active, and Passive. The ICAP hypothesis predicts that as students become more engaged with the learning materials, from passive to active to constructive to interactive, their learning will increase. We suggest possible knowledge-change processes that support the ICAP hypothesis and address the limitations and caveats of the hypothesis. In addition, empirical validation for the hypothesis is provided by examining laboratory and classroom studies that focus on three specific engagement activities: note taking, concept mapping and self-explaining. We also consider how ICAP can be used as a tool for explaining discrepant findings, dictate the proper choice of a control condition, and evaluate students’ outputs. Finally, we briefly compare ICAP to existing theories of learning.

AB - This article describes the ICAP framework that defines cognitive engagement activities on the basis of students’ overt behaviors and proposes that engagement behaviors can be categorized and differentiated into one of four modes: Interactive, Constructive, Active, and Passive. The ICAP hypothesis predicts that as students become more engaged with the learning materials, from passive to active to constructive to interactive, their learning will increase. We suggest possible knowledge-change processes that support the ICAP hypothesis and address the limitations and caveats of the hypothesis. In addition, empirical validation for the hypothesis is provided by examining laboratory and classroom studies that focus on three specific engagement activities: note taking, concept mapping and self-explaining. We also consider how ICAP can be used as a tool for explaining discrepant findings, dictate the proper choice of a control condition, and evaluate students’ outputs. Finally, we briefly compare ICAP to existing theories of learning.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84918546411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84918546411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00461520.2014.965823

DO - 10.1080/00461520.2014.965823

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84918546411

VL - 49

SP - 219

EP - 243

JO - Educational Psychologist

JF - Educational Psychologist

SN - 0046-1520

IS - 4

ER -