The human genome project after a decade

Policy issues

John Burris, Robert Cook-Deegan, Bruce Alberts

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Human Genome Project began a decade ago, its early momentum fueled by two reports. A report from the National Research Council (NRC) in February 1998 endorsed the project and provided the basis for the first joint plan by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Department of Energy (DOE). A report from the Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) in April 1988, provided Congress with a means to assess the roles of NIH and DOE. Both reports highlighted the importance of genomics and emphasized the need for a concerted research program. The committees did not predict the large investment of private funds or the extensive patenting of sequences, and they underestimated the rate of progress. Overall, though, the consensus-building provided by the committees helped to set the blueprint for one of the great success stories in modern biology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)333-335
Number of pages3
JournalNature Genetics
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Human Genome Project
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Biomedical Technology Assessment
Financial Management
Genomics
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)
  • Genetics

Cite this

The human genome project after a decade : Policy issues. / Burris, John; Cook-Deegan, Robert; Alberts, Bruce.

In: Nature Genetics, Vol. 20, No. 4, 1998, p. 333-335.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Burris, John ; Cook-Deegan, Robert ; Alberts, Bruce. / The human genome project after a decade : Policy issues. In: Nature Genetics. 1998 ; Vol. 20, No. 4. pp. 333-335.
@article{bb18bbbea9c04aada2f3cb3898786759,
title = "The human genome project after a decade: Policy issues",
abstract = "The Human Genome Project began a decade ago, its early momentum fueled by two reports. A report from the National Research Council (NRC) in February 1998 endorsed the project and provided the basis for the first joint plan by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Department of Energy (DOE). A report from the Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) in April 1988, provided Congress with a means to assess the roles of NIH and DOE. Both reports highlighted the importance of genomics and emphasized the need for a concerted research program. The committees did not predict the large investment of private funds or the extensive patenting of sequences, and they underestimated the rate of progress. Overall, though, the consensus-building provided by the committees helped to set the blueprint for one of the great success stories in modern biology.",
author = "John Burris and Robert Cook-Deegan and Bruce Alberts",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.1038/3803",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "333--335",
journal = "Nature Genetics",
issn = "1061-4036",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The human genome project after a decade

T2 - Policy issues

AU - Burris, John

AU - Cook-Deegan, Robert

AU - Alberts, Bruce

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - The Human Genome Project began a decade ago, its early momentum fueled by two reports. A report from the National Research Council (NRC) in February 1998 endorsed the project and provided the basis for the first joint plan by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Department of Energy (DOE). A report from the Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) in April 1988, provided Congress with a means to assess the roles of NIH and DOE. Both reports highlighted the importance of genomics and emphasized the need for a concerted research program. The committees did not predict the large investment of private funds or the extensive patenting of sequences, and they underestimated the rate of progress. Overall, though, the consensus-building provided by the committees helped to set the blueprint for one of the great success stories in modern biology.

AB - The Human Genome Project began a decade ago, its early momentum fueled by two reports. A report from the National Research Council (NRC) in February 1998 endorsed the project and provided the basis for the first joint plan by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Department of Energy (DOE). A report from the Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) in April 1988, provided Congress with a means to assess the roles of NIH and DOE. Both reports highlighted the importance of genomics and emphasized the need for a concerted research program. The committees did not predict the large investment of private funds or the extensive patenting of sequences, and they underestimated the rate of progress. Overall, though, the consensus-building provided by the committees helped to set the blueprint for one of the great success stories in modern biology.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031772361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031772361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/3803

DO - 10.1038/3803

M3 - Review article

VL - 20

SP - 333

EP - 335

JO - Nature Genetics

JF - Nature Genetics

SN - 1061-4036

IS - 4

ER -