The Grass is Greener, But Why? Evidence of Employees’ Perceived Sector Mismatch from the US, New Zealand, and Taiwan

Chung An Chen, Barry Bozeman, Evan Berman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To answer the question of who wants to work for the government, scholars have relied on a few approaches, including sector preference, sector-based comparison of work motives, and sector-switching patterns of job mobility. The present study offers a related but distinct approach: perceived sector mismatch. The attractiveness of public sector jobs differs greatly across countries; thus, in order to present a more comprehensive study, we examine data from the U.S., New Zealand, and Taiwan, where attitudes towards public sector jobs differ significantly as a result of different public service laws and traditions. Across all three samples, we find that, among private sector employees, the preference for a public service job is related to socio-economic disadvantage. Among public sector workers, reasons for perceived sector mismatch vary, but often suggesting job dissatisfaction in current public sector jobs, rather than perceived advantages of the private sector (including compensation). These findings are followed by theoretical and practical implications from this comparative study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-30
Number of pages30
JournalInternational Public Management Journal
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Feb 9 2018

Fingerprint

mismatch
Taiwan
New Zealand
employee
public sector
evidence
public service
private sector
service job
social attraction
Employees
Mismatch
worker
Law
Public sector
economics
Private sector
Public services

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Public Administration

Cite this

@article{89ff69dc26d843e1ba4209f4bf3569f5,
title = "The Grass is Greener, But Why? Evidence of Employees’ Perceived Sector Mismatch from the US, New Zealand, and Taiwan",
abstract = "To answer the question of who wants to work for the government, scholars have relied on a few approaches, including sector preference, sector-based comparison of work motives, and sector-switching patterns of job mobility. The present study offers a related but distinct approach: perceived sector mismatch. The attractiveness of public sector jobs differs greatly across countries; thus, in order to present a more comprehensive study, we examine data from the U.S., New Zealand, and Taiwan, where attitudes towards public sector jobs differ significantly as a result of different public service laws and traditions. Across all three samples, we find that, among private sector employees, the preference for a public service job is related to socio-economic disadvantage. Among public sector workers, reasons for perceived sector mismatch vary, but often suggesting job dissatisfaction in current public sector jobs, rather than perceived advantages of the private sector (including compensation). These findings are followed by theoretical and practical implications from this comparative study.",
author = "Chen, {Chung An} and Barry Bozeman and Evan Berman",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1080/10967494.2018.1425228",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--30",
journal = "International Public Management Journal",
issn = "1096-7494",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Grass is Greener, But Why? Evidence of Employees’ Perceived Sector Mismatch from the US, New Zealand, and Taiwan

AU - Chen, Chung An

AU - Bozeman, Barry

AU - Berman, Evan

PY - 2018/2/9

Y1 - 2018/2/9

N2 - To answer the question of who wants to work for the government, scholars have relied on a few approaches, including sector preference, sector-based comparison of work motives, and sector-switching patterns of job mobility. The present study offers a related but distinct approach: perceived sector mismatch. The attractiveness of public sector jobs differs greatly across countries; thus, in order to present a more comprehensive study, we examine data from the U.S., New Zealand, and Taiwan, where attitudes towards public sector jobs differ significantly as a result of different public service laws and traditions. Across all three samples, we find that, among private sector employees, the preference for a public service job is related to socio-economic disadvantage. Among public sector workers, reasons for perceived sector mismatch vary, but often suggesting job dissatisfaction in current public sector jobs, rather than perceived advantages of the private sector (including compensation). These findings are followed by theoretical and practical implications from this comparative study.

AB - To answer the question of who wants to work for the government, scholars have relied on a few approaches, including sector preference, sector-based comparison of work motives, and sector-switching patterns of job mobility. The present study offers a related but distinct approach: perceived sector mismatch. The attractiveness of public sector jobs differs greatly across countries; thus, in order to present a more comprehensive study, we examine data from the U.S., New Zealand, and Taiwan, where attitudes towards public sector jobs differ significantly as a result of different public service laws and traditions. Across all three samples, we find that, among private sector employees, the preference for a public service job is related to socio-economic disadvantage. Among public sector workers, reasons for perceived sector mismatch vary, but often suggesting job dissatisfaction in current public sector jobs, rather than perceived advantages of the private sector (including compensation). These findings are followed by theoretical and practical implications from this comparative study.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041864432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041864432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10967494.2018.1425228

DO - 10.1080/10967494.2018.1425228

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85041864432

SP - 1

EP - 30

JO - International Public Management Journal

JF - International Public Management Journal

SN - 1096-7494

ER -