The grand strategy of Washington and Eisenhower: Recovering the American consensus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Scholars have sought to shoehorn American foreign policy into the distinctly European theories of liberalism, realism, or nationalism that are taught in International Relations courses. But America's first grand strategy, as articulated in Washington's Farewell Address in 1796, blended such views in a distinctly American way. The widespread belief that this address counsels isolationism is wrong. Washington instead argues on behalf of an America that stands for moderation and independence in our international engagements. His legacy is evident nearly two centuries later in Eisenhower's Farewell Address in 1961. These statesmen embody the distinctive quality of American strategy that balances and blends seemingly rival principles to avoid extremes of injustice and imprudence. Tocqueville's praise of Washington's grand strategy affirms its deeper philosophical roots, as distinct from mere pragmatism. In his address, Eisenhower adapted the Washingtonian approach, blending interests and justice, prudence and principles, and power and pacific benevolence-to advocate our global leadership as America's enlightened self-interest.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)269-286
Number of pages18
JournalOrbis
Volume59
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

isolationism
pragmatism
liberalism
realism
international relations
foreign policy
nationalism
justice
leadership

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Safety Research

Cite this

The grand strategy of Washington and Eisenhower : Recovering the American consensus. / Carrese, Paul.

In: Orbis, Vol. 59, No. 2, 01.01.2015, p. 269-286.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{118be638ccb547e1bf6cac1c8cc918b3,
title = "The grand strategy of Washington and Eisenhower: Recovering the American consensus",
abstract = "Scholars have sought to shoehorn American foreign policy into the distinctly European theories of liberalism, realism, or nationalism that are taught in International Relations courses. But America's first grand strategy, as articulated in Washington's Farewell Address in 1796, blended such views in a distinctly American way. The widespread belief that this address counsels isolationism is wrong. Washington instead argues on behalf of an America that stands for moderation and independence in our international engagements. His legacy is evident nearly two centuries later in Eisenhower's Farewell Address in 1961. These statesmen embody the distinctive quality of American strategy that balances and blends seemingly rival principles to avoid extremes of injustice and imprudence. Tocqueville's praise of Washington's grand strategy affirms its deeper philosophical roots, as distinct from mere pragmatism. In his address, Eisenhower adapted the Washingtonian approach, blending interests and justice, prudence and principles, and power and pacific benevolence-to advocate our global leadership as America's enlightened self-interest.",
author = "Paul Carrese",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.orbis.2015.02.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "269--286",
journal = "Orbis",
issn = "0030-4387",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The grand strategy of Washington and Eisenhower

T2 - Recovering the American consensus

AU - Carrese, Paul

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Scholars have sought to shoehorn American foreign policy into the distinctly European theories of liberalism, realism, or nationalism that are taught in International Relations courses. But America's first grand strategy, as articulated in Washington's Farewell Address in 1796, blended such views in a distinctly American way. The widespread belief that this address counsels isolationism is wrong. Washington instead argues on behalf of an America that stands for moderation and independence in our international engagements. His legacy is evident nearly two centuries later in Eisenhower's Farewell Address in 1961. These statesmen embody the distinctive quality of American strategy that balances and blends seemingly rival principles to avoid extremes of injustice and imprudence. Tocqueville's praise of Washington's grand strategy affirms its deeper philosophical roots, as distinct from mere pragmatism. In his address, Eisenhower adapted the Washingtonian approach, blending interests and justice, prudence and principles, and power and pacific benevolence-to advocate our global leadership as America's enlightened self-interest.

AB - Scholars have sought to shoehorn American foreign policy into the distinctly European theories of liberalism, realism, or nationalism that are taught in International Relations courses. But America's first grand strategy, as articulated in Washington's Farewell Address in 1796, blended such views in a distinctly American way. The widespread belief that this address counsels isolationism is wrong. Washington instead argues on behalf of an America that stands for moderation and independence in our international engagements. His legacy is evident nearly two centuries later in Eisenhower's Farewell Address in 1961. These statesmen embody the distinctive quality of American strategy that balances and blends seemingly rival principles to avoid extremes of injustice and imprudence. Tocqueville's praise of Washington's grand strategy affirms its deeper philosophical roots, as distinct from mere pragmatism. In his address, Eisenhower adapted the Washingtonian approach, blending interests and justice, prudence and principles, and power and pacific benevolence-to advocate our global leadership as America's enlightened self-interest.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926665802&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926665802&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.orbis.2015.02.002

DO - 10.1016/j.orbis.2015.02.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84926665802

VL - 59

SP - 269

EP - 286

JO - Orbis

JF - Orbis

SN - 0030-4387

IS - 2

ER -