The geography of bankruptcy

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Companies routinely file bankruptcy cases in venues that have no meaningful connection to the company, its operations, or its stakeholders. This practice (1) divorces bankruptcy and venue from their ties to location; (2) disrupts the fundamental balance underlying the Bankruptcy Code by shifting the focus exclusively to the needs of sophisticated parties; and (3) shuts out parties who have a right to participate in bankruptcy proceedings, which contravenes due process and raises fairness concerns. To solve these problems, this Article proposes new procedures that mandate a thorough discussion of venue considerations in bankruptcy cases. By requiring parties to justify their venue choices under tougher standards and holding companies accountable for their venue decisions, the proposal helps ensure that bankruptcy cases are heard in places where key local voices and issues are recognized and addressed.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)381-439
    Number of pages59
    JournalVanderbilt Law Review
    Volume68
    Issue number2
    StatePublished - Mar 1 2015

    Fingerprint

    bankruptcy
    geography
    holding
    divorce
    fairness
    stakeholder

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Law

    Cite this

    The geography of bankruptcy. / Coordes, Laura.

    In: Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 68, No. 2, 01.03.2015, p. 381-439.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Coordes, L 2015, 'The geography of bankruptcy', Vanderbilt Law Review, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 381-439.
    Coordes, Laura. / The geography of bankruptcy. In: Vanderbilt Law Review. 2015 ; Vol. 68, No. 2. pp. 381-439.
    @article{687666a5fb9347ddb22a5aeeccc6187a,
    title = "The geography of bankruptcy",
    abstract = "Companies routinely file bankruptcy cases in venues that have no meaningful connection to the company, its operations, or its stakeholders. This practice (1) divorces bankruptcy and venue from their ties to location; (2) disrupts the fundamental balance underlying the Bankruptcy Code by shifting the focus exclusively to the needs of sophisticated parties; and (3) shuts out parties who have a right to participate in bankruptcy proceedings, which contravenes due process and raises fairness concerns. To solve these problems, this Article proposes new procedures that mandate a thorough discussion of venue considerations in bankruptcy cases. By requiring parties to justify their venue choices under tougher standards and holding companies accountable for their venue decisions, the proposal helps ensure that bankruptcy cases are heard in places where key local voices and issues are recognized and addressed.",
    author = "Laura Coordes",
    year = "2015",
    month = "3",
    day = "1",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "68",
    pages = "381--439",
    journal = "Vanderbilt Law Review",
    issn = "0042-2533",
    publisher = "Vanderbilt Law Review",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The geography of bankruptcy

    AU - Coordes, Laura

    PY - 2015/3/1

    Y1 - 2015/3/1

    N2 - Companies routinely file bankruptcy cases in venues that have no meaningful connection to the company, its operations, or its stakeholders. This practice (1) divorces bankruptcy and venue from their ties to location; (2) disrupts the fundamental balance underlying the Bankruptcy Code by shifting the focus exclusively to the needs of sophisticated parties; and (3) shuts out parties who have a right to participate in bankruptcy proceedings, which contravenes due process and raises fairness concerns. To solve these problems, this Article proposes new procedures that mandate a thorough discussion of venue considerations in bankruptcy cases. By requiring parties to justify their venue choices under tougher standards and holding companies accountable for their venue decisions, the proposal helps ensure that bankruptcy cases are heard in places where key local voices and issues are recognized and addressed.

    AB - Companies routinely file bankruptcy cases in venues that have no meaningful connection to the company, its operations, or its stakeholders. This practice (1) divorces bankruptcy and venue from their ties to location; (2) disrupts the fundamental balance underlying the Bankruptcy Code by shifting the focus exclusively to the needs of sophisticated parties; and (3) shuts out parties who have a right to participate in bankruptcy proceedings, which contravenes due process and raises fairness concerns. To solve these problems, this Article proposes new procedures that mandate a thorough discussion of venue considerations in bankruptcy cases. By requiring parties to justify their venue choices under tougher standards and holding companies accountable for their venue decisions, the proposal helps ensure that bankruptcy cases are heard in places where key local voices and issues are recognized and addressed.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926326974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926326974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84926326974

    VL - 68

    SP - 381

    EP - 439

    JO - Vanderbilt Law Review

    JF - Vanderbilt Law Review

    SN - 0042-2533

    IS - 2

    ER -