The future of FOIA: Course corrections for the digital age

Tyler Prime, Joseph Russomanno

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

After the fiftieth anniversary of the Freedom of Information Act in 2016, criticism of the law is considerable. FOIA has failed to live up to its initial promise of peeling back the layers that too often shroud the federal government in secrecy, frustrating the news media’s efforts to contribute to an informed electorate. Issues with response rates, unorganized systems and subjective interpretations of the act’s exemptions are not uncommon. This article utilizes data gathered from 2008 to 2015 that indicate that across multiple metrics, FOIA has increasingly failed to provide records to requesting parties. The trends suggest that significant overhaul is necessary. Rather than prescribing more amendments that are little more than Band-Aids on a withering dinosaur, this article concludes with a detailed set of recommendations – highlighted by a crowd-sourced request database – that move far from FOIA’s original paper-based model that still rests at its analog core.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)267-300
Number of pages34
JournalCommunication Law and Policy
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 3 2018

Fingerprint

freedom of information
Peeling
exemption
secrecy
anniversary
Federal Government
amendment
news
criticism
act
interpretation
Law
trend

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Law

Cite this

The future of FOIA : Course corrections for the digital age. / Prime, Tyler; Russomanno, Joseph.

In: Communication Law and Policy, Vol. 23, No. 3, 03.07.2018, p. 267-300.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f3944ebea95849f8830dc7902703e7ce,
title = "The future of FOIA: Course corrections for the digital age",
abstract = "After the fiftieth anniversary of the Freedom of Information Act in 2016, criticism of the law is considerable. FOIA has failed to live up to its initial promise of peeling back the layers that too often shroud the federal government in secrecy, frustrating the news media’s efforts to contribute to an informed electorate. Issues with response rates, unorganized systems and subjective interpretations of the act’s exemptions are not uncommon. This article utilizes data gathered from 2008 to 2015 that indicate that across multiple metrics, FOIA has increasingly failed to provide records to requesting parties. The trends suggest that significant overhaul is necessary. Rather than prescribing more amendments that are little more than Band-Aids on a withering dinosaur, this article concludes with a detailed set of recommendations – highlighted by a crowd-sourced request database – that move far from FOIA’s original paper-based model that still rests at its analog core.",
author = "Tyler Prime and Joseph Russomanno",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/10811680.2018.1467156",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "267--300",
journal = "Communication Law and Policy",
issn = "1081-1680",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The future of FOIA

T2 - Course corrections for the digital age

AU - Prime, Tyler

AU - Russomanno, Joseph

PY - 2018/7/3

Y1 - 2018/7/3

N2 - After the fiftieth anniversary of the Freedom of Information Act in 2016, criticism of the law is considerable. FOIA has failed to live up to its initial promise of peeling back the layers that too often shroud the federal government in secrecy, frustrating the news media’s efforts to contribute to an informed electorate. Issues with response rates, unorganized systems and subjective interpretations of the act’s exemptions are not uncommon. This article utilizes data gathered from 2008 to 2015 that indicate that across multiple metrics, FOIA has increasingly failed to provide records to requesting parties. The trends suggest that significant overhaul is necessary. Rather than prescribing more amendments that are little more than Band-Aids on a withering dinosaur, this article concludes with a detailed set of recommendations – highlighted by a crowd-sourced request database – that move far from FOIA’s original paper-based model that still rests at its analog core.

AB - After the fiftieth anniversary of the Freedom of Information Act in 2016, criticism of the law is considerable. FOIA has failed to live up to its initial promise of peeling back the layers that too often shroud the federal government in secrecy, frustrating the news media’s efforts to contribute to an informed electorate. Issues with response rates, unorganized systems and subjective interpretations of the act’s exemptions are not uncommon. This article utilizes data gathered from 2008 to 2015 that indicate that across multiple metrics, FOIA has increasingly failed to provide records to requesting parties. The trends suggest that significant overhaul is necessary. Rather than prescribing more amendments that are little more than Band-Aids on a withering dinosaur, this article concludes with a detailed set of recommendations – highlighted by a crowd-sourced request database – that move far from FOIA’s original paper-based model that still rests at its analog core.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053725094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053725094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10811680.2018.1467156

DO - 10.1080/10811680.2018.1467156

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85053725094

VL - 23

SP - 267

EP - 300

JO - Communication Law and Policy

JF - Communication Law and Policy

SN - 1081-1680

IS - 3

ER -